[389-devel] Re: Please review: 48951 dsconf and dsadm foundations

On 08/21/2016 07:56 PM, William Brown wrote: On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 19:44 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: On 08/21/2016 05:28 PM, William Brown wrote: On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:21 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi William, On 08/19/2016 02:22 AM, William Brown wrote: On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:53

[389-devel] Re: Please review: 48951 dsconf and dsadm foundations

On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 19:44 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 08/21/2016 05:28 PM, William Brown wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:21 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > >> Hi William, > >> > >> On 08/19/2016 02:22 AM, William Brown wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:53 +1000, William Brown

[389-devel] Re: Please review: 48951 dsconf and dsadm foundations

On 08/21/2016 05:28 PM, William Brown wrote: On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:21 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi William, On 08/19/2016 02:22 AM, William Brown wrote: On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:53 +1000, William Brown wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48951

[389-devel] Re: Please review: 48951 dsconf and dsadm foundations

On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:21 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > Hi William, > > On 08/19/2016 02:22 AM, William Brown wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:53 +1000, William Brown wrote: > >> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48951 > >> > >>

Fedora 25-20160821.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 12/89 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 29071 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29071 ID: 29072 Test:

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: mrceresa

On 08/21/2016 05:07 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Saturday, 20 August 2016 at 21:19, Igor Gnatenko wrote: We have bug in InsightToolKit[0] for > half year that it doesn't work properly on ARM, but maintainer doesn't respond neither to bugzilla nor to email. It's blocking me from

Fedora Rawhide-20160821.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 59/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 28953 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/28953 ID: 28954 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso

[Bug 1368854] New: perl-WebService-Drobbox should obsolete perl-Net-Dropbox-API

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368854 Bug ID: 1368854 Summary: perl-WebService-Drobbox should obsolete perl-Net-Dropbox-API Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: perl-WebService-Dropbox Severity:

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: mrceresa

On Saturday, 20 August 2016 at 21:19, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > We have bug in InsightToolKit[0] for > half year that it doesn't work > properly on ARM, but maintainer doesn't respond neither to bugzilla > nor to email. It's blocking me from importing 4 packages as all of > them failing on ARM due to

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core On i386: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core On armhfp: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

[Bug 1349675] perl-DateTime-Tiny-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349675 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1349675] perl-DateTime-Tiny-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349675 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Tiny-1.06-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-394bd4e33f -- You are receiving this

cheeselee pushed to perl-DateTime-Tiny (f25). "Update to 1.06 (BZ#1349675)"

From 3256ca2809fb7e3511455fe71eebca6b39a82bc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Lee Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:34:07 +0800 Subject: Update to 1.06 (BZ#1349675) --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-DateTime-Tiny.spec | 12 sources |

[Bug 1349675] perl-DateTime-Tiny-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349675 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- cheeselee's perl-DateTime-Tiny-1.06-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=793369 -- You are receiving this

cheeselee pushed to perl-DateTime-Tiny (master). "Update to 1.06 (BZ#1349675)"

From 3256ca2809fb7e3511455fe71eebca6b39a82bc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Lee Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:34:07 +0800 Subject: Update to 1.06 (BZ#1349675) --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-DateTime-Tiny.spec | 12 sources |

cheeselee uploaded DateTime-Tiny-1.06.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Tiny

736be4b3e8171f4a029fb6ac3712a9b4 DateTime-Tiny-1.06.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Tiny/DateTime-Tiny-1.06.tar.gz/md5/736be4b3e8171f4a029fb6ac3712a9b4/DateTime-Tiny-1.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

On 08/20/2016 06:34 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > I'm going to maintain these > > sagitter: gnustep-base, qwtplot3d, libavc1394 > I can commit 'qwtplot3d' builds for >=f25 only. Can anyone change my permissions on f23 and f24? Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: golfu

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Golo Fuchert wrote: > Hi Igor, Hey, > > If you tried to contact me by email that email got lost. I'm investigating > what went wrong there, I guess I pushed the last round of updates just > around the time when F24 was finalized and so

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: golfu

Hi Igor, If you tried to contact me by email that email got lost. I'm investigating what went wrong there, I guess I pushed the last round of updates just around the time when F24 was finalized and so somehow it didn't get in. I can fix that later. On 08/21/2016 11:34 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >

Unresponsive maintainer: golfu

Looks like Golo is not responding neither to the bug[0] nor to email. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352647 -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: aarch64 machine for packagers?

21.08.2016 00:17 "Jerry James" napisał(a): > Thanks for the information, Kevin. I guess I'll have to go the QEMU > route after all, then. Try http://linaro.cloud/ as well. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org