https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392467
Bug 1392467 depends on bug 1376324, which changed state.
Bug 1376324 Summary: root is not built for aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376324
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-xlwt
Fixed
Cheers!
--alec
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408456
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-B-Debug-1.24-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408456
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
657 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
419 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
138
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
535 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
529 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
461
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406587
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
On 12/24/2016 3:06 PM, David Muse wrote:
On 12/24/2016 11:12 AM, David Muse wrote:
On 12/24/2016 3:49 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:32:41 -0500, David Muse wrote:
Hello,
I recently started getting errors like:
17046740 build (f26, rudiments-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm):
On 12/24/2016 11:12 AM, David Muse wrote:
On 12/24/2016 3:49 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:32:41 -0500, David Muse wrote:
Hello,
I recently started getting errors like:
17046740 build (f26, rudiments-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm): open
(arm04-builder06.arm.fedoraproject.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408517
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
From 3f5ea1b6871e4219a72c7cefb75a823f488ec47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:14:14 +
Subject: Update to 0.32
- New upstream release 0.32
- Update Changes and distribution metadata
---
perl-Test-Warn.spec | 6 +-
sources
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 14:57 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
> Atomic qcow2 x86_64
> Workstation live i386
> Kde live x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Workstation live x86_64
> Kde live i386
>
> Failed openQA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408517
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
pghmcfc's perl-Test-Warn-0.32-1.fc26 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=829204
--
You are receiving this mail
From 3f5ea1b6871e4219a72c7cefb75a823f488ec47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:14:14 +
Subject: Update to 0.32
- New upstream release 0.32
- Update Changes and distribution metadata
---
perl-Test-Warn.spec | 6 +-
sources
a14d6a87cfa19d54a3055b3c94143b95788ed2a30b2813d952255891a84165f0baf8b9cad167c8d5c87870220aaeeedcfe48db73246966be6aea41ad26779e6a
Test-Warn-0.32.tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408519
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
From 95abe3f7d93407ac823612642351818d929b67e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:02:18 +
Subject: Update to 1.21
- New upstream release 1.21
- Declare variables with our() to avoid warnings (GH#109, GH#171)
- Empty mapping value at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408519
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
pghmcfc's perl-YAML-1.21-1.fc26 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=829203
--
You are receiving this mail
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:15:57 +0100
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 12/22/2016 09:50 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a):
> >> On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote:
> >>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of
From 95abe3f7d93407ac823612642351818d929b67e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:02:18 +
Subject: Update to 1.21
- New upstream release 1.21
- Declare variables with our() to avoid warnings (GH#109, GH#171)
- Empty mapping value at
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-12-23, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Friday, December 23, 2016 10:42:33 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote:
> >> > >>
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:47:12 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Jerry James
> wrote:
> > Thanks, Kevin. I'm thinking positive, affirming thoughts about
> > this build. :-)
>
> Well, it looks like this build is suffering
1542c9a931a7c2c460cd89d66978747a6feee855993529b05638456ff4f16fa5273e539b7423e843d63ccfd29c650e2d46b9140388d44cc6c812a0e0c6be9cd3
YAML-1.21.tar.gz
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 09:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:31:43 +0100
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I don't recall the example Adam mentions, but I have no reason to
> > > doubt it.
> >
> > I don't recall it either, so that's
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 13:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I don't recall the example Adam mentions, but I have no reason to doubt
> > it.
>
> I don't recall it either, so that's already 2 people. And I tend to remember
> such things. So you should in fact doubt it.
>
> Do
On 12/24/2016 3:49 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:32:41 -0500, David Muse wrote:
Hello,
I recently started getting errors like:
17046740 build (f26, rudiments-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm): open
(arm04-builder06.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: The
following noarch
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:31:43 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I don't recall the example Adam mentions, but I have no reason to
> > doubt it.
>
> I don't recall it either, so that's already 2 people. And I tend to
> remember such things. So you should
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 00:33:19 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 09:28 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > > With the move to kerberos, fedora-cert becomes un-needed.
> >
> > Is
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 59/80 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in
On Sáb, 2016-12-24 at 14:23 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:39:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > libaudclient was no longer used by any package, so it is a good
> > time to
> > retire it for F26 . As usual who may want it, can take it .
> Why has it been
perl-Search-Xapian has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.24.0-1.fc26.x86_64 requires
libxapian.so.22()(64bit)
On armhfp:
perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.24.0-1.fc26.armv7hl requires libxapian.so.22
On ppc64le:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit)
On armhfp:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1
On ppc64le:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit)
On armhfp:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3
On ppc64le:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On aarch64:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core
On ppc64:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core
On ppc64le:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core
perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit)
On armhfp:
perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1
On ppc64le:
perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit)
On
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:39:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> libaudclient was no longer used by any package, so it is a good time to
> retire it for F26 . As usual who may want it, can take it .
Why has it been reintroduced then?
Apparently, no effort has been spent on using it within
Hi,
libaudclient was no longer used by any package, so it is a good time to
retire it for F26 . As usual who may want it, can take it .
Cheers
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I don't recall the example Adam mentions, but I have no reason to doubt
> it.
I don't recall it either, so that's already 2 people. And I tend to remember
such things. So you should in fact doubt it.
Do not believe everything you read on the Internet!
> How about the dbus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408535
Bug ID: 1408535
Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.54 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-SQLite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Timothy Ward wrote:
> […]
> Keep the politics out of the way.
While I mostly agree with everything else you've written, setting
goals, striking balances and deciding on resource allocation is, well,
politics…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408536
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1235197
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1235197=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408536
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408537
Bug ID: 1408537
Summary: perl-GraphViz-2.23 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-GraphViz
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408536
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.041 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408536
Bug ID: 1408536
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.042 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 24/12/2016 03:59, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> >
> > > Second question: I've uploaded new sources by using the new kinit
> > > method, but I see that the sources are actually double uploaded
> > > (upload reaches 100% and then
Il 24/12/2016 03:59, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
Second question: I've uploaded new sources by using the new kinit
method, but I see that the sources are actually double uploaded
(upload reaches 100% and then restart again a second time). Is that
normal?
I've seen that as well... I m not sure
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:32:41 -0500, David Muse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently started getting errors like:
>
> 17046740 build (f26, rudiments-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm): open
> (arm04-builder06.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: The
> following noarch package built differently on
On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 09:28 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > With the move to kerberos, fedora-cert becomes un-needed.
>
> Is there a way to get the FAS username from kerberos using another
> python module? fedora-easy-karma uses
Hello,
I recently started getting errors like:
17046740 build (f26, rudiments-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm): open
(arm04-builder06.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: The
following noarch package built differently on different architectures:
rudiments-doc-1.0.1-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
rpmdiff
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> With the move to kerberos, fedora-cert becomes un-needed.
Is there a way to get the FAS username from kerberos using another
python module? fedora-easy-karma uses fedora-cert to get the current FAS
username.
Kind regards
Till
52 matches
Mail list logo