adelton pushed to perl-Scalar-List-Utils (master). "1408347 - Rebase to upstream version 1.47."

From 4f1552044edc16c3ef57007e7dd8b2589b3517e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Pazdziora Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 08:56:13 +0100 Subject: 1408347 - Rebase to upstream version 1.47. --- perl-Scalar-List-Utils.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 2 files

adelton uploaded Scalar-List-Utils-1.47.tar.gz for perl-Scalar-List-Utils

526d248a794bede2b9bda8cff73a10a116b16578fd646db69c88456aa432d84ced33e5024e632331a992412d0c05fed19846873554a731bbd1eaa3d9e6124c38 Scalar-List-Utils-1.47.tar.gz

Re: Packages FTBFS with Python 3.6

On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 00:18 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > libproxy The test suite for this is failing (one of the tests triggers an exception) on ppc64, ppc64le and aarch64. Not yet sure why. We might want to ask the arch teams. It passes on x86_64, i686 and armv7hl. This still happens with the

[Bug 1409275] New: perl-threads-shared-1.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409275 Bug ID: 1409275 Summary: perl-threads-shared-1.53 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-threads-shared Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1409273] New: perl-PAR-Packer-1.036 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409273 Bug ID: 1409273 Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.036 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PAR-Packer Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

IPFS and Fedora repositories

In past days I started playing with IPFS[1] "A peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol to make the web faster, safer, and more open." At [2] there is a very quick explanation about how IPFS works. The Freenode IRC channel #ipfs has more than 1000 users, so there is a great interest in it. By reading some

Re: Packages FTBFS with Python 3.6

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > texlive is *built*, but there's a koji problem with getting it tagged: > > https://pagure.io/koji/issue/259 A big "thank you" to everybody who worked on fixing the texlive issue. Unfortunately, sympy still

Re: List of packages owning %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__

On Monday, November 14, 2016 11:49:32 PM WET Athos Ribeiro wrote: > Hello, > > Guidelines say that %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__ should not be owned > by python packages because python3-libs already owns it [1]. That > directory is actually owned by system-python-libs. > > While going through a

python-ipdb license change (GPLv2+ -> BSD)

Hello fellow devs! I recently unorphaned python-ipdb and in working to get it updated to it's latest release I noted that upstream's license has shifted from GPLv2+ to BSD with their 0.9 release (Rawhide currently has 0.8.3). I'm working on updating Rawhide to 0.10.1, but I will leave F24/25 on

Re: koji: ppc64 does not have libatomic in buildroot

On 12/30/2016 02:32 PM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: On 12/30/2016 01:44 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 12/30/2016 12:49 PM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: Hi guys, My latest build [1] of dnsdist failed on ppc64, because libatomic is not in the default buildroot there, as opposed to all the other arches.

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Ref-Util (perl-Ref-Util-0.111-1.fc26). "Update to 0.111 (..more)"

From c8e2db444137556abeac5209b1e14a91b267c6f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:37:26 + Subject: Update to 0.111 - New upstream release 0.111 - Fix test failure on 5.8.5 and under - Moved to Dist::Zilla --- perl-Ref-Util.spec | 11

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Ref-Util (master). "Update to 0.111 (..more)"

From c8e2db444137556abeac5209b1e14a91b267c6f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:37:26 + Subject: Update to 0.111 - New upstream release 0.111 - Fix test failure on 5.8.5 and under - Moved to Dist::Zilla --- perl-Ref-Util.spec | 11

pghmcfc uploaded Ref-Util-0.111.tar.gz for perl-Ref-Util

a5f1b9c480f637484445607e679ec90989b3787c3dea0876ea69f15da24925a9a205ecd6f04af5869629597d968528115da0550f504f9502cc02b2cade8c6ae4 Ref-Util-0.111.tar.gz

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MetaCPAN-Client (perl-MetaCPAN-Client-2.004000-2.fc26). "Update to non-trial release (..more)"

From a53e1127e7b83f3a9559f4781949ffeab3509e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:26:39 + Subject: Update to non-trial release - New non-trial release from upstream - Speed up own scroller - Fixed rev_deps ---

pghmcfc pushed to perl-MetaCPAN-Client (master). "Update to non-trial release (..more)"

From a53e1127e7b83f3a9559f4781949ffeab3509e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:26:39 + Subject: Update to non-trial release - New non-trial release from upstream - Speed up own scroller - Fixed rev_deps ---

pghmcfc uploaded MetaCPAN-Client-2.004000.tar.gz for perl-MetaCPAN-Client

b5f19d20c8024caaa6521469b64cf4ff96e819f4c330824448de1c5c8964761c9e0c8013925582e3ecd1cc385fe2f3b18a74516d1fac1e9ed1f9d52029bbbec1 MetaCPAN-Client-2.004000.tar.gz

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On armhfp: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl requires libuno_cppu.so.3 perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl requires libuno_cppu.so.3(LIBO_UDK_4.4) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core

unsubscribe

unsubscribe ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: koji: ppc64 does not have libatomic in buildroot

On 12/30/2016 01:44 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/30/2016 12:49 PM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> My latest build [1] of dnsdist failed on ppc64, because libatomic is not >> in the default buildroot there, as opposed to all the other arches. >> Is this intentional? Should I just

Re: koji: ppc64 does not have libatomic in buildroot

On 12/30/2016 12:49 PM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: Hi guys, My latest build [1] of dnsdist failed on ppc64, because libatomic is not in the default buildroot there, as opposed to all the other arches. Is this intentional? Should I just add libatomic as a BR? [1]

koji: ppc64 does not have libatomic in buildroot

Hi guys, My latest build [1] of dnsdist failed on ppc64, because libatomic is not in the default buildroot there, as opposed to all the other arches. Is this intentional? Should I just add libatomic as a BR? [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17115104 -- Regards, Sander

Re: noarch package built differently...

On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:24:03 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > OK, maybe you're talking about having %{_isa} in the spec file, ie: > > %package doc > ... > BuildArch: noarch > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} > > ? That would make the dependency include "(x86-64)" (or

Re: noarch package built differently...

On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:09:24 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 09:59:54AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 21:33:52 -0500, David Muse wrote: > > > > > I guess noarch packages shouldn't have any arch-specific dependencies. > > > Is that correct?

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-Compress-Lzma (perl-IO-Compress-Lzma-2.070-1.fc26). "Update to 2.070 (..more)"

From 5d11364dca48798e8696ef5754e071a2272aa7aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:24:23 + Subject: Update to 2.070 - New upstream release 2.070 (no changes) - Simplify find command using -delete --- perl-IO-Compress-Lzma.spec | 12

Re: Mock: cmake having trouble finding libclaw

On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:11:10 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > $ claw-config all --libs > > -L/usr/lib -lclaw_application -lclaw_logger -lclaw_dynamic_library -ldl > > -lclaw_configuration_file -lclaw_graphic -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lclaw_logger > > -lclaw_net -lclaw_tween > > > > Is relinking with

Re: Access to github.com for building documentation?

Am Thu, 29 Dec 2016 21:40:52 -0700 schrieb Dave Johansen : > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:30 PM, William Moreno > wrote: > > > > > > > El 29/12/2016 9:00 p. m., "Dave Johansen" > > escribió: > > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at

Re: Mock: cmake having trouble finding libclaw

Thanks to Michael for his investigation. Thanks to Orion for your support, could you please commit a package for f24/f25 also ? Thanks Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to