Re: Packaging wiki: shortcoming in Github Source0 (?)

On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 07:05 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 02/02/18 04:47, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > Quick hint I have learned and here is the example for COPR Scribus > > spec > > file: > > > > https://github.com/%{name}project/%{name}/archive/master.tar.gz#/%{ > >

[Bug 1539470] perl-SNMP-Info-3.43 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539470 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: joost

Hi, Richard. What's the status on trying to reach joost? I use Pascal for some of my personal projects, so it's important to me that the Pascal stack in Fedora is operational. Have you began the procedure to take over the packages from joost? I'd be willing to join as a co-maintainer.

Re: The New Hotness builds failing with py2_dist macros

Actually comprehending your message, I see it's not you building this package at all and it's not doing it in koji, either. So I wonder what environment is present when hotness is trying to build the SRPM. If somehow it doesn't have redhat-rpm-config installed (or epel-rpm-macros if running on

Re: The New Hotness builds failing with py2_dist macros

> "MC" == Michael Cullen writes: MC> returned 1: error: line 27: Dependency tokens must begin with MC> alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': BuildRequires:%{py2_dist nose} This implies that the %py2_dist macro isn't defined at that point in time and so you just get a

The New Hotness builds failing with py2_dist macros

Has anyone else notices this sort of thing? Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild','-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', u'/var/tmp/thn-gkVzfc/python-twilio.spec'] returned 1: error: line 27: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or

Self Introduction Matthew Ruszczyk (mruszczyk) NEEDSPONSOR / NEEDREVIEW

Hello, My name is Matthew, I'm interested in joining the Fedora Packagers Group to package a piece of software called whipper. I am a 27 year old network administrator at a small company in Pennsylvania, US. I've dabbled in open source software for years and Fedora has been my main distribution

Re: leave

thanks! ;) > Kevin Fenzi hat am 2. Februar 2018 um 18:49 geschrieben: > > > On 02/02/2018 06:51 AM, inderau...@arcor.de wrote: > > leave > > > If you are trying to unsubscribe, please mail the unsubscribe address below: > > > ___ > >

Re: gnome crashes after today upgrade

Yeah I'm getting a bunch of clutter messages as well as many lines of gnome shell desktop related stack traces. But there is nothing listed by coredumpctl, or abrt. Feb 02 13:51:31 f27h.localdomain org.gnome.Shell.desktop[1612]: == Stack trace for context 0x557b7ae9d000 ==

gnome crashes after today upgrade

Hi, Looks like today updates are trashing gnome almost completely. gdm-x-session cannot setup XKB mapping. gnome-shell is core dumping .. "journalctl -xe" output is in attachment. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH * log.txt.gz Description:

Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact

On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:32:33 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > rpms/gqview Really?! It is unmaintained for over 10 years. It has been forked into Geeqie (package "geeqie") roughly 10 years ago, and Geeqie at least has seen several releases since then. ___

[Bug 1541190] perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.92 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541190 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.92-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1541186] perl-bignum-0.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541186 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-bignum-0.48-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Review request: compat-giflib

Hi For the giflib-5.x update (see [1]) I need compat-giflib reviewed [2]. Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GifLib5 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541516 ___ devel mailing list --

Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact

Greetings. There's some packages that have been orphaned by FESCo and are seeking a new point of contact to stay in the collection. If you are interested in becoming the point of contact for these, please note it in the appropriate ticket below for quickest processing. (no need to reopen the

[Bug 1541190] perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.92 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541190 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1541186] perl-bignum-0.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541186 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1061 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 824 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 406

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 934 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 824 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 795

Re: about ssl certificate transparency .

On 02/02/2018 01:11 AM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > Hi. > > I read about this issue: > > https://www.certificate-transparency.org/what-is-ct > > and chrome > > https://www.certificate-transparency.org/certificate-transparency-in-chrome > > I want to know if the ssh from fedora account can

Re: leave

On 02/02/2018 06:51 AM, inderau...@arcor.de wrote: > leave If you are trying to unsubscribe, please mail the unsubscribe address below: > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding devtoolset to EPEL

On 02/01/2018 07:40 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> On 01/31/2018 10:53 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >>> So we have a problem with what is the canonical place for SCL's. I was >>> going from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/ which just says x86_64.  >> >> Even

[Bug 1531386] Upgrade perl-File-Copy-Recursive to 0.39

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531386 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.

[EPEL-devel] Re: Dummy python2 packages submitted

Thanks Jason, this is a good idea. - Ken On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > All of the initial run of packages have been submitted now. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/EPELPythonStubPackages for the > complete list of builds. > >

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-02)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-02-02) === Meeting started by nirik at 16:02:35 UTC. The full logs are available

[Bug 1531386] Upgrade perl-File-Copy-Recursive to 0.39

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531386 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Packaging wiki: shortcoming in Github Source0 (?)

> "PM" == Panu Matilainen writes: PM> Yes spectool was recommended by somebody else already, but PM> ultimately only rpm itself can truly parse a spec, spectool is just PM> a rough approximation (but usually does work in the more common PM> cases, yes) Actually the

Re: Testers for LCD Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics wanted

On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 12:34 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife > > I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and enable > Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel

Fedora Rawhide-20180202.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 12/129 (x86_64), 4/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 190342 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/190342 ID: 190353 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

On mardi 30 janvier 2018 16:11:49 CET nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > Hi, > > Now the technical PR is submitted > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-srpm-macros/pull-request/1 > > and waiting for action from the go-srpm-macros maintainers, I took (quite a > long) time to refresh and

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-02-02)

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to

Re: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:

> On 02/02/18 13:01, Dan Horák wrote: > > Yes I'm pretty sure that is > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537522 which affects > anything that builds documentation with doxygen because graphviz crashes > on i686 so the graphs never get created and hence are missing from the >

Re: Packaging wiki: shortcoming in Github Source0 (?)

On 2 February 2018 at 10:41, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2018-02-02, 08:49 GMT, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >> $ wget -P ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES $(rpmbuild -bp --define "prep > >> %dump" bettercap.spec 2>&1 | awk '/SOURCEURL0/ {print $3}') > > Or even better > > $ spectool -g

Re: F28 Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for s390x

On 01/31/2018 06:26 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: On 01/30/2018 11:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic, Cloud and Docker images for s390x =

Re: Packaging wiki: shortcoming in Github Source0 (?)

On 2 February 2018 at 08:49, Panu Matilainen wrote: [..] > You need to download Source0 first. >> Try: >> >> $ wget -P ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES $(rpmbuild -bp --define "prep %dump" >> bettercap.spec 2>&1 | awk '/SOURCEURL0/ {print $3}') >> > > That's a rather arcane way of getting

leave

leave ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Discussion of RPM packaging > standards and practices for Fedora"

No more automagic bytecompilation

Did you know that if you put a .py file outside /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/, rpmbuild will automatically byte-compile .pyc/.pyo for it? Using Python 2 by default? I find this (and especially the details of how it's done) too surprising, too limited and too hard to configure properly. Miro and I are

Re: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:

On 02/02/18 13:01, Dan Horák wrote: On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 12:43:10 - "Martin Gansser" wrote: Hi, when building a new package version of libmicrohttpd for rawhide on koji, the package build fails with the following error message [1]: BuildError: The following

Re: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:

> The issue appears to be in documentation. Isn't there some timestamp or > something like that? > > > V. > > > Dne 2.2.2018 v 13:43 Martin Gansser napsal(a): Hi Vit, what does you mean with timestamp ? [martin@f27 libmicrohttpd-0.9.59]$ grep -r timestamp doc/*

Re: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:

On Fri, 02 Feb 2018 12:43:10 - "Martin Gansser" wrote: > Hi, > > when building a new package version of libmicrohttpd for rawhide on > koji, the package build fails with the following error message [1]: > > BuildError: The following noarch package built

Re: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:

The issue appears to be in documentation. Isn't there some timestamp or something like that? V. Dne 2.2.2018 v 13:43 Martin Gansser napsal(a): > Hi, > > when building a new package version of libmicrohttpd for rawhide on koji, the > package build fails with the following error message [1]: >

[Bug 1541372] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541372 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:

Hi, when building a new package version of libmicrohttpd for rawhide on koji, the package build fails with the following error message [1]: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures: libmicrohttpd-doc-0.9.59-1.fc28.noarch.rpm rpmdiff output was:

[Bug 1541370] perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.93 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541370 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

Randy Barlow wrote: > It would help people with more minimal package sets more often. On days > with just a handful of updates, it's possible that some users don't use > any of them and thus don't have to get notified. Even if they don't get notified, they still have to download the whole

[Bug 1541372] New: perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541372 Bug ID: 1541372 Summary: perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Log-Report-Optional Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1541370] New: perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.93 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541370 Bug ID: 1541370 Summary: perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.93 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Bot-BasicBot Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Missing /boot/grub2/grubenv symlink target in remix composes

Hi, I am having a strange issue with my latest Kannolo (Fedora Remix) composes. (In case it matters: I use livecd-creator, not livemedia-creator.) For some reason, the symlink /boot/grub2/grubenv is now dangling, the target /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grubenv is missing. This makes grub2-install and

Re: Rawhide make segfaults.

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:23:47PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > make-4.2.1-6.fc28 is building now and should be available in buildroot very > soon. Thanks for sorting this out. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and

Re: Rawhide make segfaults.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 11:53 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/02/2018 09:31 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 02/02/2018 09:25 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > At present I can't build glibc in rawhide because make segfaults: > > > > > > + make

Re: Packaging wiki: shortcoming in Github Source0 (?)

On 02/02/2018 12:41 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: On 2018-02-02, 08:49 GMT, Panu Matilainen wrote: $ wget -P ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES $(rpmbuild -bp --define "prep %dump" bettercap.spec 2>&1 | awk '/SOURCEURL0/ {print $3}') Please mind your quotes, I didn't write that. Or even better $ spectool -g

Re: Rawhide make segfaults.

On 02/02/2018 09:31 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 02/02/2018 09:25 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: At present I can't build glibc in rawhide because make segfaults: + make -j4 -O -r 'CFLAGS=-mtune=generic -g -O2  -fstack-clash-protection' make -r PARALLELMFLAGS="" -C .. objdir=`pwd` all make: ***

Re: Rawhide make segfaults.

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:25:56AM -0800, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > At present I can't build glibc in rawhide because make segfaults: > > + make -j4 -O -r 'CFLAGS=-mtune=generic -g -O2 -fstack-clash-protection' > make -r PARALLELMFLAGS="" -C .. objdir=`pwd` all > make: *** [Makefile:9: all]

Re: Packaging wiki: shortcoming in Github Source0 (?)

On 2018-02-02, 08:49 GMT, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> $ wget -P ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES $(rpmbuild -bp --define "prep >> %dump" bettercap.spec 2>&1 | awk '/SOURCEURL0/ {print $3}') Or even better $ spectool -g bettercap.spec (spectool is from rpmdevtools) Matěj -- http://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/,

about ssl certificate transparency .

Hi. I read about this issue: https://www.certificate-transparency.org/what-is-ct and chrome https://www.certificate-transparency.org/certificate-transparency-in-chrome I want to know if the ssh from fedora account can be used in same way? Thank you. Best regards.

Re: Testers for LCD Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics wanted

Hi, On 01-02-18 15:59, Don Zickus wrote: On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:34:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and enable

Re: Packaging wiki: shortcoming in Github Source0 (?)

Hi, Alternatively, in fedora-devel, you can play with: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forge-hosted_projects_packaging_automation#Packaging_examples The intent is to push it to Fedora stable and probably EPEL after a few weeks of testing in devel. So don't wait for the push to stable to check

Re: Testers for LCD Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics wanted

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 12:34 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife > > I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and

Re: Packaging wiki: shortcoming in Github Source0 (?)

On 02/02/2018 02:21 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On 1 February 2018 at 23:42, Germano Massullo > wrote: [,..] you will obviously get error: File /home/user/rpmbuild/SOURCES/bettercap-ng-eb1a53e.tar.gz: No such file or

[Bug 1541190] perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.92 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541190 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.92-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8648fe19fc -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1541190] perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.92 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541190 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.92-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-85be6253b7 -- You are receiving this

Re: Rawhide make segfaults.

On 02/02/2018 09:25 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: At present I can't build glibc in rawhide because make segfaults: + make -j4 -O -r 'CFLAGS=-mtune=generic -g -O2 -fstack-clash-protection' make -r PARALLELMFLAGS="" -C .. objdir=`pwd` all make: *** [Makefile:9: all] Segmentation fault (core

Rawhide make segfaults.

At present I can't build glibc in rawhide because make segfaults: + make -j4 -O -r 'CFLAGS=-mtune=generic -g -O2 -fstack-clash-protection' make -r PARALLELMFLAGS="" -C .. objdir=`pwd` all make: *** [Makefile:9: all] Segmentation fault (core dumped) error: Bad exit status from

[Bug 1541190] perl-Bot-BasicBot-0.92 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541190 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1541185] perl-DBD-Multi-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541185 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1541186] perl-bignum-0.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541186 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-bignum-0.48-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-529c976f51 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1541185] perl-DBD-Multi-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541185 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1541186] perl-bignum-0.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541186 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-bignum-0.48-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3b2b0981cb -- You are receiving this mail