Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change proposal: Remove glibc-all-langpacks from buildroot

Hi Zbigniew, nice to meet you at Flock. On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5:30 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot > > == Summary == > glibc-minimal-langpack is added to @Buildsystem group and installed > into the minimal buildroot

Fedora 29-20180903.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 273823 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/273823 ID: 273833 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL:

Fedora Rawhide-20180903.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 31/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180902.n.0): ID: 273745 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/273745 Old failures (same test failed

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-09-04 - 89% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/04/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180903git78fc627.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: upgrade tinyproxy for f29?

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:38:44PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:29:34PM

Re: upgrade tinyproxy for f29?

On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:38:44PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:29:34PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Peter Robinson > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: upgrade tinyproxy for f29?

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:29:34PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Adam wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180903.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-29-20180902.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20180903.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den mån 3 sep. 2018 kl 12:56 skrev Fabio Valentini : > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 09:13 Ron Yorston wrote: >> >> Adam Williamson wrote: >> >On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 08:58 -0700, stan wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39 +0200 >> >> Andreas Tunek wrote: >> >> >> >> > There is no root acoount on a

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den mån 3 sep. 2018 kl 14:07 skrev Hans de Goede : > > Hi, > > On 02-09-18 09:33, Andreas Tunek wrote: > > Den lör 1 sep. 2018 kl 15:50 skrev stan : > >> > >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 13:44:56 +0200 > >> Andreas Tunek wrote: > >> > >>> I can't get a commandline, everything seems stuck in the boot > >>>

Re: upgrade tinyproxy for f29?

On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:29:34PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Adam wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Tinyproxy just released a new version 1.10 which is has been overdue > > > and containes

Re: upgrade tinyproxy for f29?

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Adam wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Tinyproxy just released a new version 1.10 which is has been overdue > > and containes 2 CVE fixes apart from several enhancements. > > > > I created builds for

[Bug 1624947] New: perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624947 Bug ID: 1624947 Summary: perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.73 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooseX-Getopt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1624945] New: perl-Mojolicious-7.94 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624945 Bug ID: 1624945 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-7.94 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1624944] New: perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator-1.116 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624944 Bug ID: 1624944 Summary: perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator-1.116 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1624943] New: perl-Locale-Codes-3.58 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943 Bug ID: 1624943 Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.58 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Locale-Codes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1624942] New: perl-File-Path-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942 Bug ID: 1624942 Summary: perl-File-Path-2.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-Path Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1624940] New: perl-Date-Manip-6.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624940 Bug ID: 1624940 Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.73 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Date-Manip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1624939] New: Upgrade perl-Config-Model-TkUI to 1.367

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624939 Bug ID: 1624939 Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Model-TkUI to 1.367 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-Model-TkUI Assignee: david.hanneq...@gmail.com

[Bug 1624935] perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624935 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com --- Comment

[Bug 1624936] Upgrade perl-Alien-pkgconf to 0.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624936 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1624937] New: Upgrade perl-AnyEvent-HTTP to 2.24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624937 Bug ID: 1624937 Summary: Upgrade perl-AnyEvent-HTTP to 2.24 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-AnyEvent-HTTP Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1624936] New: Upgrade perl-Alien-pkgconf to 0.15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624936 Bug ID: 1624936 Summary: Upgrade perl-Alien-pkgconf to 0.15 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Alien-pkgconf Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1624935] New: perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624935 Bug ID: 1624935 Summary: perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.15 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Alien-pkgconf Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: upgrade tinyproxy for f29?

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Adam wrote: > > Hi all, > > Tinyproxy just released a new version 1.10 which is has been overdue > and containes 2 CVE fixes apart from several enhancements. > > I created builds for rawhide already. > > I was wondering if it is still possible to get

upgrade tinyproxy for f29?

Hi all, Tinyproxy just released a new version 1.10 which is has been overdue and containes 2 CVE fixes apart from several enhancements. I created builds for rawhide already. I was wondering if it is still possible to get tinyproxy to this important update in f29, since no other packages depend

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180903.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180902.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180903.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 64 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 956.63 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

Neal Gompa píše v Po 03. 09. 2018 v 09:01 -0400: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:02 AM Adam Samalik > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM Richard Shaw > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:32 AM Adam Samalik > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought that

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

On 09/02/2018 05:51 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hello, > > is it possible to build packages like foo0.6 from dist-git repo with name > foo and not foo0.6? > > Since in Rust ecosystem from time to time we need to build multiple > versions of a same package, it is much easier if it would be one

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 3:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:02 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM Richard Shaw > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:32 AM Adam Samalik > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> I thought that Arbitrary Branching (now

Managing stream (arbitrary) branch and module lifecycles

This is a summary of a recent thread [1]. Traditional branches (such as "f29") have their EOL (end of life) encoded in the name. But what about stream branches [2] (such as "2.4" or "latest")? Stream branches of RPM packages would always have an EOL associated with them. The format would be on

New policy for orphaning/retiring packages with open security bugs

FESCo accepted [1] a new policy to handle packages with long-standing known security bugs in a way similar to FTBFS bugs: AGREED: If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is currently open against a package, or a security issue of lower severity has been open for at least 6 months, four

Re: Intent to retire or orphan keybinder - python2 version

The rpath/libtool issue is fixed https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4ddd5fcd1f ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:02 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:32 AM Adam Samalik wrote: >>> >>> >>> I thought that Arbitrary Branching (now referred to as Stream Branching) >>> was initially developed for Modularity

libevent License tags corrected

Hi, I reviewed the licensing of libevent and found the License tags to be incorrect. The License tag of libevent was changed from "BSD" to "BSD and ISC". The License tag of libevent-doc was changed from "BSD" to "BSD and MIT". Best regards Ondřej Lysoněk

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

On 3.9.2018 14:34, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 08/31/18 13:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31.8.2018 13:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31.8.2018 09:05, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:02 PM Ben Cotton > wrote:

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

On 08/31/18 13:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31.8.2018 13:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31.8.2018 09:05, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:02 PM Ben Cotton > wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error     ==

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Hi, On 02-09-18 09:33, Andreas Tunek wrote: Den lör 1 sep. 2018 kl 15:50 skrev stan : On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 13:44:56 +0200 Andreas Tunek wrote: I can't get a commandline, everything seems stuck in the boot process Is there anyway to get a commandline and update the system when it is in

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:32 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > >> >> I thought that Arbitrary Branching (now referred to as Stream Branching) >> was initially developed for Modularity only. >> >> Were there any plans to use it for standalone packages

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 6:56 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > One example is that I maintain the package OpenImageIO which has a very > disciplined upstream that's careful about not making API/ABI breaking > changes within a minor release. I would like to get branches for each minor > release that's

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:32 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > > I thought that Arbitrary Branching (now referred to as Stream Branching) > was initially developed for Modularity only. > > Were there any plans to use it for standalone packages as well? > Thank you for bringing this up... I re-read the

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 09:13 Ron Yorston wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > >On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 08:58 -0700, stan wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39 +0200 > >> Andreas Tunek wrote: > >> > >> > There is no root acoount on a default F29 installation. Also, you > >> > can't see the boot menu

[Bug 1623848] Upgrade perl-Pegex to 0.65

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623848 --- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar --- You need to read to code changes and check whether it's compatible or not. Based on the results, you can decide if it is possible to build Pegex-0.65 for F28. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Adam Williamson wrote: >On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 08:58 -0700, stan wrote: >> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39 +0200 >> Andreas Tunek wrote: >> >> > There is no root acoount on a default F29 installation. Also, you >> > can't see the boot menu and I haven't been able to trigger it. >> >> Whoa! I'm not

Self introduction: Alain Vigne

Hi everyone, I am Alain, a French EE engineer using Fedora 28 and EDA open source tools, for a long time now. I am part of the pcb-rnd developer upstream http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/ and was able to produce a .spec file + SRPM rpm file + COPR successful builds:

Re: Building multiple version of a package from same dist-git repo

On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 18:21, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 17:51 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is it possible to build packages like foo0.6 from dist-git repo with name > > foo and not foo0.6? > > > > Since in Rust ecosystem from time to time we need to build