Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Michael Rice

2018-09-30 Thread Raphael Groner
Hi Peter, I could help to co-maintain the package of pyvmomi in case of an orphaning process. Maybe it's faster to let a provenpackager apply your patch to bump to version 6.7, it should be API compatible as VMware promises. We should also try to ask on the special python mailing list. Regards,

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-10-01 - 91% PASS

2018-09-30 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/10/01/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180930gitc73cd26.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Non-responsive maintainer: Michael Rice

2018-09-30 Thread Peter Oliver
Does anyone know how to contact Michael Rice, maintainer of the package python-pyvmomi? He hasn't made any commits since the package was first released. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493946 -- Peter Oliver ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

2018-09-30 Thread Björn Persson
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0]. > > If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to > > open ticket or submit pull request for

Announcement: python-asyncssh license change EPL1 to EPL2/GPLv2+

2018-09-30 Thread Georg Sauthoff
Hello, fyi, with the update to the latest upstream version 1.14, the python-asyncssh package (binary subpackage: python3-asyncssh) also updated its license from 'EPL-1.0' to 'EPL-2.0 or GPLv2+' (a.k.a. as EPL-2.0 with GPLv2+ secondary license clause). See also: - Package Description: Python 3

Fedora 29-20180929.n.0 compose check report

2018-09-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/133 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 286906 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/286906 ID: 286925 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

[Test-Announce] Correction: 2018-10-01 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2018-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 09:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting > # Date: 2018-09-24 > # Time: 15:00 UTC > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) > # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net > > Greetings testers! > > The meeting last week

[Test-Announce] 2018-09-24 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2018-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2018-09-24 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! The meeting last week was a little short on people thanks to some holidays and so on, so let's have

[Test-Announce] 2018-09-24 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 29 Blocker Review Meeting

2018-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
# F29 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2018-10-01 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 7 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting tomorrow. Again we have GNOME and grub2 bugs on the

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180929.n.0 changes

2018-09-30 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-29-20180927.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20180929.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 61 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 12.01 MiB Size of dropped packages:10.75 MiB

Re: Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

2018-09-30 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 14:02:37 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hello everyone, Hello, > We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0]. > If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to > open > ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee

[Bug 1632294] perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90119 is available

2018-09-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632294 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1632302] perl-HTTP-Tinyish-0.15 is available

2018-09-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632302 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1632763] perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator-1.117 is available

2018-09-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632763 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403

2018-09-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30.9.2018 14:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: Got this when I run `fedpkg new-sources`. $ fedpkg --release master new-sources wheel-0.32.0.tar.gz Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403 What do i need to do? I've rekinited, I've rerun

Resurrection of the NeuroFedora SIG

2018-09-30 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/NeuroFedora I've recently resurrected the NeuroFedora SIG. Many thanks to Igor and the others who'd worked on it in the past and have given us a firm base to build on. The goal - The (current) goal of the NeuroFedora SIG is to make Fedora an

Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403

2018-09-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
Got this when I run `fedpkg new-sources`. $ fedpkg --release master new-sources wheel-0.32.0.tar.gz Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403 What do i need to do? I've rekinited, I've rerun `fedora-packager-setup`, `fedora-cert` tells me it's not needed

Orphaned python2-matplotlib

2018-09-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
I've orphaned python2-matplotlib. Nobody replied to my previous heads up e-mails. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Orphaning some Java packages

2018-09-30 Thread Raphael Groner
> Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > > what rule is that? > > -- Rex Maybe our guidelines [*] about bundling and duplication is threatened with modularity. Last but not least, if there's a CVE or soname bump in whatever library, we'd need to rebuild the whole modularity stack depending. That would