On Sunday, 27 February 2022 01:37:08 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 2/26/22 02:21, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > On Friday, 25 February 2022 14:02:11 CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> I think this is probably one of those things that would be worth
> >> forming a SIG on. An Electron SIG could help
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-18ac3af1c8
varnish-4.0.5-3.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-af77a11507
seamonkey-2.53.11-1.el7
The following builds have
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 8:44 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Fedora doesn't require this yet.
>
> … and will hopefully not do so any time soon!
Just as with the elimination of 32-bit support
(both x86, and the upcoming arm retirement)
there will come a time for
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 22/231 (x86_64), 34/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220224.n.1):
ID: 1149897 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220224.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220226.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 119
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 188
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 44.73 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 10:20 AM Martin Gansser
wrote:
>
> sovled by adding this to the spec file.
>
> %global __cmake_in_source_build 1
>
That's not right; the problem is you are doing
%cmake .
which forces the build into the source directory instead of doing the
default build directory that
On 2/26/22 02:21, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Friday, 25 February 2022 14:02:11 CET Neal Gompa wrote:
>> I think this is probably one of those things that would be worth
>> forming a SIG on. An Electron SIG could help with Electron and all
>> Electron-based applications that come into Fedora.
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 12/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220225.n.0):
ID: 1149412 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1149412
ID: 1149526 Test: x86_64
OLD: Fedora-36-20220225.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220226.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
The c4core package will be updated to 0.1.9 in Rawhide in one week
(2022-03-05), or slightly later, with an accompanying .so version bump.
This shouldn’t affect any packages, as c4core is a leaf package. (It
will be a dependency for rapidyaml once that is packaged.)
– Ben
sovled by adding this to the spec file.
%global __cmake_in_source_build 1
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hello Rust packagers,
Following up on my previous emails, there are still a lot of Rust packages that
were imported to Fedora, but the recommended "initial setup" for them was never
finished.
I have started by adding them all "rust-*" packages to koschei, which makes it
way easier for me to see
On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 08:02 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:54 AM Andreas Schneider
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1]
> > built on
> > Fedora. Yesterday I was finally able to do the first working build
> > for
Hi,
compiling of otter-browser fails on rawhide with this message[1]:
-- Build files have been written to: /builddir/build/BUILD/otter-browser-1.0.03
+ /usr/bin/cmake --build redhat-linux-build -j6 --verbose
Error: /builddir/build/BUILD/otter-browser-1.0.03/redhat-linux-build is not a
directory
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220225.0):
ID: 1149396 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220225.0):
ID: 1149380 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Florian Weimer wrote:
> Fedora doesn't require this yet.
… and will hopefully not do so any time soon!
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
17 matches
Mail list logo