https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182563
Bug ID: 2182563
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.60 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180050
Bug 2180050 depends on bug 2180059, which changed state.
Bug 2180059 Summary: Add perl-Module-Util to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180059
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180043
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179977
Bug 2179977 depends on bug 2180043, which changed state.
Bug 2180043 Summary: Add perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180043
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180059
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182227
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
Hey All,
As we come closer to Fedora 38 release dates, it's time to test upgrades.
Fedora 38 has a lot of changesets and it becomes essential that we
test the graphical upgrade methods as well as the command line.
As a part of this test day[0], we will test upgrading from a full
updated, F36 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179500
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Parallel-Pipes-0.200-1 |perl-Parallel-Pipes-0.200-1
I just orphaned golang-github-exoscale-egoscale. I'm no longer
interested in maintaining it. It's up for grabs for any interested
parties. Do note that currently it fails to install in F39 [0]
because one of its dependencies was retired [1], so that will need to
be sorted out to keep the
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 03:19:00PM +, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Mon Mar 27, 2023 at 07:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:57:04AM -, Aleš Matěj wrote:
>
> > > However you are right dnf can't handle that. It looks for deltas in the
> > > same repo where it finds
> >
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:43:43PM -, David Duncan wrote:
> > ...snip...
> >
> >
> > I think this is a great idea and we should do it, but I have some
> > questions. :)
> >
> > We currently use 'fedimg' to upload ami images, and it currently uploads gp2
> > and 'standard' images. Do we
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-03-28/fesco.2023-03-28-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-03-28/fesco.2023-03-28-17.00.txt
Log:
As a lurker of no note (feel free to ignore this rest of this post) I have
resisted commenting since the thread started last fall. And I'm sure
anything I post might come off as 'from the peanut gallery,' as it probably
should. I'm going 'off-topic,' but I feel it's related. And I don't envy
the
This is just a note that nim was packaged in Fedora at one point[1], but was
orphaned and eventually retired. There is a process[2] for reviving such a
package; it will be similar to the process for adding a new package.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nim
[2]
All right.
Thank you for your clear answer!
Jun
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 4:20 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
> Dear Jun,
>
> No, it's not a Fedora-specific issue. You try to provide a replacement
> to a system library, and this change may affect all the binaries built
> with the system area.
>
> ...snip...
>
>
> I think this is a great idea and we should do it, but I have some
> questions. :)
>
> We currently use 'fedimg' to upload ami images, and it currently uploads gp2
> and 'standard' images. Do we need to then modify fedimg to upload gp3?
>
I am working on replacing the
I'm also late to the party with this feedback, but just in case it's
not too late to include, can we include something about not updating
the package further? Beyond just "you do not need to take any
action", we should advise against making any changes at that point, as
often the RHEL package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182319
--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth ---
So here's the problematic snippet:
hid: [
0x05, 0x01, 0x09, 0x06, 0xa1, 0x01, 0x05, 0x07, 0x19, 0xe0, 0x29, 0xe7,
0x15, 0x00, 0x25, 0x01,
0x75, 0x01, 0x95, 0x08, 0x81, 0x02, 0x95, 0x01, 0x75,
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-03-29 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
Ok, thanks, much appreciated!
Richard.
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 15:57, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 28. 03. 23 16:53, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've got a package that's a mixture of BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause
> > (the original, old licence), and is current labelled "License:
On 28. 03. 23 16:53, Richard Hughes wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a package that's a mixture of BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause
(the original, old licence), and is current labelled "License: BSD" --
but I get the following:
license-fedora2spdx BSD
Warning: more options on how to interpret BSD.
Hi all,
I've got a package that's a mixture of BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause
(the original, old licence), and is current labelled "License: BSD" --
but I get the following:
license-fedora2spdx BSD
Warning: more options on how to interpret BSD. Possible options:
['BSD-1-Clause',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182319
--- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
YAML supports only YAML 1.0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182319
Dear Jun,
No, it's not a Fedora-specific issue. You try to provide a replacement
to a system library, and this change may affect all the binaries built
with the system area.
You shouldn't replace or shadow the system library with your own one,
otherwise you get PROBLEMS.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182319
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact||extras...@fedoraproject.org
We didn't hold a meeting for a few weeks. Let's do one today to push
some stalled subjects. Sorry for sending this out so late.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local
2.2.0 will hit F37 and F38 stable repos tonight.
I'm holding EPEL9 back a little bit longer.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 9:21 AM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
> On ti, 21 maalis 2023, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've updated Certbot to 2.2.0 in rawhide, f38, f37, and epel9. I wanted
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 03:16:29PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_2
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal
OLD: Fedora-38-20230327.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230328.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 68
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 271.70 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Alternatively, rpkg could ship the hook in a more central location (which has
exec). This would allow you to set `core.hooksPath` for your fedpkg repos,
maybe even automatically by using something like `git config
includeif.gitdir:~/fedora/.path ~/.config/git/config.fedora` and putting the
Dear Dmitry,
Thanks! The workaround worked!
Is this issue Fedora specific?
Can we fix the case:
`LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/jaruga/.local/openssl-3.0.8/lib/ gdb` to work
by modifying the gdb or openldap patches?
Which is better to fix the gdb or openldap?
Jun
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 5:45 PM Dmitry
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230327.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230328.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 193
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.41 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182352
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth ---
If this is still a problem by the time the Perl 5.38 rebuild comes along, we
could always work around it by dropping perl(Lexical::Sub) as a build
requirement - the failing test is optional and would be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182227
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-7ae646fad8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7ae646fad8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182227
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Compile-3.1.1-1.f
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Compile` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
3.1.1 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Compile/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Compile`
that you are following:
``
3.1.1 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Compile/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 17:11:06 +0530, Riya Bisht wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Riya,
> I'm interested to package and maintain nim-lang. I've never used nim before
> but
> i would like to start packaging for fedora. I can learn nim in the process.
> Could you please help me to get started with this?
That's
Hello,
I'm interested to package and maintain nim-lang. I've never used nim before
but i would like to start packaging for fedora. I can learn nim in the
process. Could you please help me to get started with this?
Thanks,
Regards,
Riya Bisht
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023, 4:19 pm Ankur Sinha, wrote:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182352
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 147376
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182352
Bug ID: 2182352
Summary: perl-Devel-CallParser-0.002-30.fc39 FTBFS:
t/leximport.t fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL:
Hi folks,
One of my packages, taskopen[1], has moved to nim in the latest release.
I'd like to update it, but I've never used nim (and don't intend to) and
so, don't want to maintain a nim-lang stack all by myself.
Any folks in the community interested in packaging and maintaining nim?
I'll very
Hello folks,
Bodhi will probably be upgraded to 7.1.1 before the F38 final freeze and
I want to highlight a notable change which may impact update
submissions. The change is that update notes field will now be limited
to 10k characters length.
The request came from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182227
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
V Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:46:49AM -0400, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:24 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 2:10 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 12:27 PM Kalev Lember
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 5:06
On 27/03/2023 14:41, Fabio Valentini wrote:
It's doing new pre-push checks that were introduced in rpkg 1.66:
Thanks for the information.
As far as I know, there's no way to disable the checks for now, other
than to do "rm .git/hooks/pre-push".
Will do, because my $HOME is mounted with
On 27/03/2023 22:28, Andy Cress wrote:
I didn't find this when searching the guide.
Pointers?
You must use Kerberos now:
sudo dnf install fedora-packager fedora-packager-kerberos
fkinit --user $your_fas
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
Yes, it is an attempt to realise the whole thing with meson, but I have no
experience with it at all.
Thanks for the info
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dne 27. 03. 23 v 11:45 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a):
> License: MIT
>
>
> Now going to https://spdx.org/licenses/ and looking for the SPDX Identifier
> shows:
>
> MIT License MIT
>
>
> What am I supposed to do as a maintainer of libtermkey?
Double check which kind of MIT the package
49 matches
Mail list logo
