On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 6:35 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
> I've filed a ticket here:
>
> https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/457
>
>
Thanks Kevin and Tom for getting this flagged as a Council ticket.
--
*jwf* (*he/him*) || j...@redhat.com
TZ=America/New_York (UTC-4)
While I may be
Hi Gary, hi all,
Thanks for filing the Fedora Council ticket and flagging this. Ben trained
me on the election process and transferred ACLs to me before his final day
at Red Hat. I dropped the ball on continuity. I will run the elections this
round. The timing with Red Hat Summit this week, the
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-cd6dc8dccf
wordpress-5.1.16-1.el7
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-00ddf3658a
dropbear-2017.75-3.el7
4
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
69 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-78e9d2e031
dropbear-2019.78-5.el8
6
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-734a94ae05
dropbear-2020.80-7.el9
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6fba4b91e0
chromium-113.0.5672.126-1.el9
1
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:50 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> Wait, what?? Someone at RH wakes up in the morning and decides to cut
> one of the key roles (or better, THE) of Fedora community and this goes
> completely unannounced, unnoticed and without any backup plan?
I do understand why
On 5/24/23 08:44, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Dne 20. 05. 23 v 22:43 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
>> I noticed that by default, Qubes OS has voluntary kernel preemption
>> as opposed to full preemption. I found that enabling full preemption
>> (preempt=full on kernel command line) makes the system
On 5/24/23 13:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:36:58PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 5/24/23 12:31, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:23 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
What's the process for selecting a new Program Manager?
From the words that have been shared
On 5/24/23 4:49 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Wait, what?? Someone at RH wakes up in the morning and decides to cut
one of the key roles (or better, THE) of Fedora community and this goes
completely unannounced, unnoticed and without any backup plan?
I have seen other dumb decisions by RH
Il 24/05/23 21:19, Josh Boyer ha scritto:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:55 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 24.05.2023 um 20:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure we no longer have a program manager?
>> What’s that about?
> Red Hat recently announced a round of layoffs[1] and the Fedora
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 12:36:58PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On 5/24/23 12:31, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:23 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
> >
> > > What's the process for selecting a new Program Manager?
> >
> > From the words that have been shared at:
> >
On 5/24/23 12:31, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:23 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
What's the process for selecting a new Program Manager?
From the words that have been shared at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/council/fpgm/
the position itself has been eliminated.
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:23 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
> What's the process for selecting a new Program Manager?
From the words that have been shared at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/council/fpgm/
the position itself has been eliminated.
The important responsibilities will
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 3:23 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> On 5/24/23 12:19, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:55 PM Peter Boy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 24.05.2023 um 20:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
> >>>
> >>> I'm pretty sure we no longer have a program manager?
> >>
> >> What’s
On 5/24/23 12:19, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:55 PM Peter Boy wrote:
Am 24.05.2023 um 20:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
I'm pretty sure we no longer have a program manager?
What’s that about?
Red Hat recently announced a round of layoffs[1] and the Fedora
Program Manager
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:55 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 24.05.2023 um 20:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
> >
> > I'm pretty sure we no longer have a program manager?
>
> What’s that about?
Red Hat recently announced a round of layoffs[1] and the Fedora
Program Manager role was impacted.
Ben
On Wed, May 24, 2023, at 2:55 PM, Peter Boy wrote:
>> Am 24.05.2023 um 20:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>>
>> I'm pretty sure we no longer have a program manager?
>
> What’s that about?
As I understand it, part of recent Red Hat layoffs. Red Hat and Fedora
program/project managers were impacted.
On Tue, May 23, 2023, at 1:08 AM, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>> I actually would prefer that we color both, and make it obvious that
>> "root" is special. We should account for common color-blindness
>> issues, though.
>
> Sure, I think I
> Am 24.05.2023 um 20:30 schrieb Chris Murphy :
>
> I'm pretty sure we no longer have a program manager?
What’s that about?
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_coreos_meeting
Meeting started by dustymabe at 16:29:48 UTC. The full logs are
available at
On Wed, May 24, 2023, at 12:03 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the schedule[1], the voting period was supposed to begin
> on Friday, but elections.fedoraproject.org does not list any open elections
> yet. Does anyone have an ETA for when voting will start?
I'm pretty sure we no
On Sat, May 20, 2023, at 4:43 PM, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Therefore, I am
> asking if Fedora should use full kernel preemption by default.
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/228
The outstanding questions:
a. Do we need some tests that help decide this with metrics? If so what should
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Just a general answer/info here at the bottom of the thread...
>
> I realize our container build pipeline is not great, but it's currently
> working and I will keep it working until we replace it.
>
> I agree we should replace it, and there's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184385
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Date-ICal-2.681 is |perl-Date-ICal-2.682 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184385
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Date-ICal-2.682-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101517337
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184385
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1966650
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1966650=edit
Update to 2.682 (#2184385)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Hi,
According to the schedule[1], the voting period was supposed to begin
on Friday, but elections.fedoraproject.org does not list any open elections
yet. Does anyone have an ETA for when voting will start?
Thanks,
Tom
[1]
If the need to package a snapshot goes away
'need' is certainly one right operative question.
whose?
Redhat's?
official Fedora packaging's?
"just us COPR users"?
i'm in the last camp.
i build/package to scratch my own projects' requirements' itch(es).
here's one,
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:13:15AM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
> In your example, the forge macros simplify the spec file only because a
> snapshot is involved; but the forge macros put the snapshot info in the
> Release field, which is still permissible but deprecated[1].
>
> Without the forge
In your example, the forge macros simplify the spec file only because a
snapshot is involved; but the forge macros put the snapshot info in the Release
field, which is still permissible but deprecated[1].
Without the forge macros, the spec file would admittedly be a little more
complex. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208828
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-4194a84c82 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
V Wed, May 24, 2023 at 02:34:57PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> > I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
> > rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
> >
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
> rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
> change was already announced in
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:56:30AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 23/05/2023 19:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >... so today I was taking part in a package review which uses these
> >macros and was surprised to be told that they are deprecated.
>
> Their author left Fedora a few
Dne 20. 05. 23 v 22:43 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a):
I noticed that by default, Qubes OS has voluntary kernel preemption
as opposed to full preemption. I found that enabling full preemption
(preempt=full on kernel command line) makes the system significantly
more responsive under heavy I/O
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230523.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230524.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 49
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 174.69 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209461
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Software-License-0.104
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209461
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209461
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On 24-05-2023 09:56, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 23/05/2023 19:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
... so today I was taking part in a package review which uses these
macros and was surprised to be told that they are deprecated.
Their author left Fedora a few years ago. They're now
On 23/05/2023 19:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
... so today I was taking part in a package review which uses these
macros and was surprised to be told that they are deprecated.
Their author left Fedora a few years ago. They're now unmaintained and
may be removed soon (see FPC ticket[1]).
Hello,
I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
change was already announced in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5.
Best regards
Jaroslav Mracek
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 5:11 AM Parag Nemade wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:58 PM Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I know this has been asked before, more recently four years ago in
>>
43 matches
Mail list logo
