The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0454ca80fd
clamav-0.103.9-1.el7
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-254992a2ef
chromium-116.0.5845.96-1.el7
The following builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233000
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-c53b6dfe97 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-55ab0f1cd3 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234337
Bug ID: 2234337
Summary: perl-DBD-Pg-3.17.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Pg
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231692
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-8e73ab98ad has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233000
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-2e6690438d has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231692
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3f4ac88ec3 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233000
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3b0b79931c has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231470
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0a32dc4de5 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
Hello,
My name is Łukasz, a software engineer from Poland.
In free time, I'm contributing to various OSS projects, mainly LineageOS.
For Fedora, I plan to co-maintain WeeChat package and help with other
packages that I'll notice some issues with.
- Łukasz
Dear all,
zeek, an open source network security monitoring tool, has an out of
date version, 4.2.0 packaged for EPEL 8 and 9:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/zeek/
It was also never built for Fedora.
Per upstream documentation,
Dear all,
I'm proposing that we retire python-django in EPEL 7 and EPEL 8
The versions are really old and no longer supported; see
https://www.djangoproject.com/download/
EPEL 7: 1.11.27
EPEL 8: 2.2.24
There are a lot of CVEs open, and upstream only patch the versions that
are still
Dne 23. 08. 23 v 21:39 Richard Fontana napsal(a):
We are only treating the
*GPL family differently because of SPDX's (possibly unfortunate)
decision to do the same.
But technically
| GPL-2.0-or-later+
|
|is a valid SPDX string. Right?
|
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 1:41 PM Steven A. Falco
wrote:
> On 8/23/23 02:22 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
On 2023-08-24 04:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 07:04:14PM +, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 12:32 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> > On 19-08-2023 23:15, Maxwell G wrote:
> > > == Summary ==
> > > Up until now, the
> > >
Miroslav Suchý venit, vidit, dixit 2023-08-23 20:22:42:
> Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 5:08 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 08. 23 v 22:55 Richard Fontana napsal(a):
> > The use of `+` is documented at
> > https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2-draft/SPDX-license-expressions/
> > (there's probably a more recent version)
> >
> >
> > D.3 Simple license
On Wed, 2023-08-23 at 20:22 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 12:32 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 19-08-2023 23:15, Maxwell G wrote:
> > == Summary ==
> > Up until now, the
> > [https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/7331757cf12ee645e895e7e6e91d73ff66106e12/f/macros.forge
> > forge macros]
> > have been part of
just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
however all was succesfull with adding the parameters --best -- allowerasing
Installing weak dependencies:
avif-pixbuf-loader x86_64
0.11.1-11.fc39 fedora 16 k
On Wed Aug 23, 2023 at 13:00 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 21-08-2023 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I don't want to maintain it, but pytest uses it for tests, so I don't
> > want to be retired. Is there somebody else who would take better care of
> > it than I do?
>
>
> Miro, you are way too young
> Problem 1: package libblockdev-vdo-2.24-2.fc32.x86_64 from @System requires
> libbd_utils.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - libblockdev-utils-2.28-5.fc38.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
> - problem with installed package
On 8/23/23 02:22 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
Problem 1: problem with installed package
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-08-23/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-08-23-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-08-23/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-08-23-16.30.txt
Log:
Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=39
On 23. 08. 23 13:17, Sandro wrote:> This might be out of scope, but would it
also be possible to have it fail or
issue a warning if %pyproject_save_files -l marks a license, but the packager
also uses an explicit %license in %files. That would prevent duplication.
Unfortunately, the macro have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233885
Bug ID: 2233885
Summary: perl-URI-5.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-URI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Hi Christiano,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 5:30 AM Christiano Anderson
wrote:
> I'm Scala developer and I'm willing to maintain (or co-maintain) Scala
> package, maybe add Scala 3 as well.
>
> Since I have never maintained any Fedora package, if I find a sponsor, I'll
> be glad to maintain (or
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 03:59:39PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:53:27 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 03:48:44PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > > The hard link trick didn't actually fix the issue with SELinux file
> > > contexts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231692
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231692
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-8e73ab98ad has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8e73ab98ad
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231692
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3f4ac88ec3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3f4ac88ec3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231692
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 03:48:44PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> The hard link trick didn't actually fix the issue with SELinux file
> contexts properly: as opposed to symbolic links, SELinux now
> correctly associates types to the labels that are set -- except that
> those labels are now
OLD: Fedora-39-20230822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 20
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 119.81 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231692
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231470
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0a32dc4de5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0a32dc4de5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231470
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231470
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Dne 23. 08. 23 v 12:44 Sandro napsal(a):
On 20-08-2023 12:19, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
If you are workshop participant and have PR opened for longer than 14 days then
let me know and I will merge it.
Here's the one I made during Flock workshop:
On Wednesday, August 23rd, 2023 at 13:00, Sandro wrote:
> Miro, you are way too young to "be retired".
>
> I'd be willing to take over maintainership of the package. As always,
> co-maintainers are welcome.
If you need a co-maintainer, feel free to invite me.
Python and Scala are the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 98
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 135.75 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
I'm Scala developer and I'm willing to maintain (or co-maintain) Scala package,
maybe add Scala 3 as well.
Since I have never maintained any Fedora package, if I find a sponsor, I'll be
glad to maintain (or co-maintain) Scala.
___
devel mailing list
On 19-08-2023 22:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 19. 08. 23 19:44, Maxwell G wrote:
Hi Pythonistas,
%pyproject_save_files automatically handles marking license files
with %license when a build backend installs them into a package's
dist-info directory and the License-File header is specified in the
On 21-08-2023 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I don't want to maintain it, but pytest uses it for tests, so I don't
want to be retired. Is there somebody else who would take better care of
it than I do?
Miro, you are way too young to "be retired".
I'd be willing to take over maintainership of
On 20-08-2023 12:19, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
If you are workshop participant and have PR opened for longer than 14
days then let me know and I will merge it.
Here's the one I made during Flock workshop:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/90-Second-Portraits/pull-request/1
Maybe it's a good
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233769
Bug ID: 2233769
Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-MultiMarkdown to 1.001
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Text-MultiMarkdown
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231459
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233765
Bug ID: 2233765
Summary: Upgrade perl-HTML-Selector-XPath to 0.28
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/HTML-Selector-XPath
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231459
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
>
> In the end most of the patches were dropped the uplift wasn't worth the
> effort of maintaining them downstream, when the effort can be better
> spent getting a 10X uplift using a more modern compression
> implementation (ex zstd/lz4/lzo/etc) that isn't written with so many
> byte oriented
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-4887bcf496 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4887bcf496
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232889
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-55ab0f1cd3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-55ab0f1cd3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
55 matches
Mail list logo
