Re: Need SELinux help for fail2ban!

On 5/4/24 2:58 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 4:49 PM Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez mailto:carlosrodrifernan...@gmail.com>> wrote: The suggestion for one of the comments of using `/run/fail2ban(/.*)?` instead of `/run/fail2ban.*` doesn't work? I try to be very careful

Re: Need SELinux help for fail2ban!

On 5/4/24 1:05 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I still don't understand SELinux and would appreciate an assist! fail2ban-server is unable to create the socket file /run/fail2ban/fail2ban.sock There's a lot of custom SELinux policies and I'm unable to figure out what needs to change. I made a PR.

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 40 Final is GO Need to fix up for good grub.cfg Cant install Workstation and KDE on same system.

On 4/18/24 14:09, Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote: Even when the two distros are on separate drives.  I have tested all combinations, and Fedora40 grub2-mkconfig  does not allow two Fedora40's on the same system. Try it. Put F40Workstation on one drive and F40KDE on a second drive It

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 40 Final is GO Need to fix up for good grub.cfg Cant install Workstation and KDE on same system.

On 4/18/24 12:42, Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote: With my testing, I could not install  one copy of Fedora40gnome and then on the same system the copy of Fedora40KDE. Whatever came second, has a signature for grub2-mkconfig, that causes the first F40 menuentrys to be replaced by the

Re: xz backdoor

On 3/29/24 11:00, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: wow: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/ Specifically: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4 I think at this point we clearly cannot trust xz upstream anymore and should probably fork the project. --

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

On 2/25/24 09:02, Ralf Corsépius wrote: My actual problem seems to be not being able to get rid of the "installed groups". "dnf group remove " apparently uninstalls all packages from this . This is not what I want. I want to remove the comps-groups from my system, because of the harmful

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

On 2/24/24 01:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Error:   Problem: conflicting requests    - package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.i686 from fedora conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote: # dnf system-upgrade download

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb: On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40 ... No match for group package "multican"

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40 ... No match for group package "multican" ... WTH? It was a program for controlling Canon cameras that has been retired. Some group you have installed has that package listed in it. The comps groups need

Re: Mounting USB Storage devices with "sync" option ?

On 1/31/24 00:57, Larina Loriasel via devel wrote: We approach this problem from a different angle: the user is supposed to sync the filesystem before removing. Graphical environments have an "eject" button, and for non-graphical environments, the user just needs to do a sync manually. I am

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

On 12/27/23 15:12, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/27/23 06:05, Sandro wrote: I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe folks on the list may have an idea. I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

On 12/27/23 06:05, Sandro wrote: I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe folks on the list may have an idea. I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong. Feel free to reply either on discussion

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

On 12/27/23 08:20, Sandro wrote: I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well. You need to also update the initramfs using dracut or the modified mdadm.conf won't be available at boot.

Re: DNF5: Checking signatures of packages installed out of a repository?

On 11/2/23 06:36, Christopher wrote: On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:50 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 11:05:33AM -0400, Christopher wrote: It's also not clear when this option would take effect. Would it take effect if I did `dnf install /path/to/local/file` or just when I did no,

Re: Access superseded Fedora RPMs

On 9/9/23 01:05, Marius Schwarz wrote: Am 08.09.23 um 22:32 schrieb Michel Lind: Try installing fedora-repos-archive -- you'll get a repo definition for fedora-updates-archive, which has all versions of released updates rather than just the latest. Are you sure it's working? [root ~]# dnf

Re: Access superseded Fedora RPMs

On 2023-09-08 12:58, Kai A. Hiller wrote: I’m trying to recreate – on the level of RPMs – a Fedora system as resolved by DNF at an earlier moment in time (think lockfile). Collecting a list of the installed RPMs and their versions for a given system is easily done via `dnf list installed`;

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

On 8/25/23 20:51, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote: On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 06:55:17PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: It's a lot of output, but not *so* many problems when you boil it down. Yeah, it's ultimately another example (or four) of how Python is utterly worthless as a "stable"

Re: Broken link

On 6/24/23 10:06, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/24/23 02:17, Mikhail Gorsky via devel wrote: https://mirror.linux-ia64.org/ <https://mirror.linux-ia64.org/> On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 12:11:59 PM GMT+5, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/23/23 22:50, Mikhail Gorsky via devel wrote:  > Hello! P

Re: Broken link

On 6/24/23 02:17, Mikhail Gorsky via devel wrote: https://mirror.linux-ia64.org/ <https://mirror.linux-ia64.org/> On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 12:11:59 PM GMT+5, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/23/23 22:50, Mikhail Gorsky via devel wrote: > Hello! Please pay attention that ISO for x8

Re: Broken link

On 6/23/23 22:50, Mikhail Gorsky via devel wrote: Hello! Please pay attention that ISO for x86_64 from https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download/  is not available. It works fine for me. Maybe you got a bad mirror. If it happens again,

Re: Missing features...

On 6/8/23 00:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:43:50AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/7/23 06:59, Adam Ł. wrote: What about missing feature ? Feature requests go to the upstream issue tracker. It's spam - best to ignore, and hopefully the list maintainers can delete

Re: Missing features...

On 6/7/23 06:59, Adam Ł. wrote: What about missing feature ? https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nandi-bishal_powerpoint-design-study-activity-7072031917180674048-stI8?utm_source=share_medium=member_desktop Feature requests go to the upstream issue tracker.

Re: LibreOffice packages

On 6/2/23 19:50, Ralph Bromley wrote: This is a stupid bonehead idea, libreoffice is just too big to reliably run in flatpak. Plus what about java integration, guess the languagetool plugin wont work now and I will have to use its stupud online version where you havwe to pay to add words. Oh

Re: Fedora 38 EPEL 9 - python3-pydot-1.4.2-6.el9.noarch python3-soupsieve-2.4.1-1.el9.noarch missing depedecies ...

On 5/14/23 07:33, André verwijs via devel wrote: Fedora 38 EPEL 9 python3-pydot-1.4.2-6.el9.noarch python3-soupsieve-2.4.1-1.el9.noarch missing depedecies ... Issue 1: Unable to install the best update candidate for package python3-pydot-1.4.2-5.fc38.noarch - nothing offers python(abi)

Re: fedora 38 - in witch timespan a net iso is build..??

On 5/9/23 05:10, André verwijs wrote: installed Fedora with "Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-38-1.6.iso" but hat small issues. (firewall packages) In witch timespan will a new iso be build..?? At least use the latest updates for this (or any other) installation iso... An issue with the

Re: F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

On 4/9/23 16:05, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I haven't seen before on F37 when I tried the same thing. Specifically, I am trying to install packages from a

Re: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstamrnb.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.1-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer1-plugins-ug

On 3/16/23 19:14, Reon Beon via devel wrote: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstamrnb.so from install of gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.1-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.0-1.fc39.x86_64 file

Re: Verification failed

On 2/1/23 17:31, Reon Beon via devel wrote: Secure boot is failing on Fedora Rawhide. That's slightly better, but now missing the original information... Provide *all* the information you can. How, when, what did you change, etc. ___ devel mailing

Re: Verification failed

On 2/1/23 15:29, Reon Beon via devel wrote: Verification failed: (0x1A) Security Violation OK This is not a useful email. What is the context? What is your question? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: systemd-resolved package overwrite /etc/resolv.conf again

On 1/21/23 18:55, Bill C wrote: I am going to ask because I am curious. Is systemd a good resolving server? I normally don't run servers but I find this thread interesting. Everyone seems to want to shutdown systemd-resolver and go to network manager. At least that's how I have been

Re: Rawhide with kernel-6.2 requires VBox SVGA video mode to boot in VirtualBox

On 1/7/23 09:04, Alain Vigne wrote: I sympathize On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 4:51 AM Ian Laurie > wrote: The old setting produces a configuration alert with Linux systems (although it does work).  This feels like a kernel problem to me rather than a

Re: "rescue" boot entry files are not updated on OS upgrades

On 1/3/23 18:02, Sérgio Basto wrote: But isn't missing inst.rescue boot option [2] ? That's a different thing. The rescue kernel is only to have all kernel modules available. The "inst.rescue" mode is available on netinst images (and maybe others?) and boots an actual rescue mode that lets

Re: "Failed to set unit properties ..." during update

On 12/20/22 00:12, Peter Boy wrote: Yesterdays update showed a warning in logwatch of a Fedora Server instance (F36, plain standard installation, nothing fancy, just httpd and a systems-container): - dnf-rpm Begin Packages Updated:

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On 12/16/22 21:29, Bob Hepple wrote: I am the packager for wf-recorder (a wl-roots/wayland screen recorder) which presently resides in rpmfusion - it uses proprietary ffmpeg codecs by default (libx246). Now that we have ffmpeg-free we have an opportunity to move wf-recorder to the mainstream

Re: vala error for any GTK+ source code

On 11/19/22 05:54, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: I wonder if the implementation of the libraries or settings package is not well defined. I used: sudo dnf groupinstall "Development Tools" "Development Libraries" I got this error after watching a video tutorial about Vala and GTK+ on ubuntu

Re: Steam install bug

On 10/26/22 00:22, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 26/10/2022 04:41, Reon Beon via devel wrote: Can not download xz-libs. sudo dnf install --refresh xz-libs xz-libs.i686 With --refresh dnf will update metadata before downloading any packages. He was trying to do it from Gnome Software.

Re: Steam install bug

On 10/25/22 23:51, Reon Beon via devel wrote: Only when done by command line. That almost certainly means that the PackageKit metadata cache was stale. "pkcon refresh force" would probably force an update, but it doesn't matter now anyway since you've already done your update from the

Re: Steam install bug

On 10/25/22 21:47, Reon Beon via devel wrote: They are up to date: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6451 You said it installs fine, so what's the bug? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Steam install bug

On 10/25/22 19:41, Reon Beon via devel wrote: Can not download xz-libs. https://ibb.co/cQPHXQw Sounds like a not up-to-date mirror or stale metadata. Did you modify your repo config? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Fwd: F36 BTRFS crashed

On 9/17/22 15:17, Brian Clark wrote: About a 2 weeks ago using VirtualBox I started up a Fedora 36 Workstation, then start making a ruby on rails web app. This evening when I started up the project file I only got to emergency mode because the filesystem is not mountable. I did a quick google

Re: small aarch64 home server

On 9/16/22 14:02, Peter Boy wrote: Am 16.09.2022 um 13:43 schrieb Stephen Snow : Have you looked at the Khadis boards? They're available through Digikey canada at

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

On 9/14/22 09:40, Scott Beamer wrote: I just copied and pasted from the OP... Ok, but you have to be aware that your email client might reformat the text and mess up the lines. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

On 9/13/22 12:07, Scott Beamer wrote: # dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command

Re: Why install rsyslog by default?

On 2022-08-25 08:22, Barry Scott wrote: On 25 Aug 2022, at 16:05, Robert Marcano via devel mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On 8/25/22 11:02 AM, Barry Scott wrote: I just found that rsyslog is installed and by default creating legacy log files in /var/log like messages and

Re: ImageFactory issue with new 20220813 branch

On 8/13/22 15:23, Jerry James wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 4:11 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/13/22 10:49, Peter Boy wrote: I’m just testing the new 20220813 branch end encounter several issues. Branch of what? I'm assuming F37 or rawhide. One of them is image factory, which I need

Re: ImageFactory issue with new 20220813 branch

On 8/13/22 10:49, Peter Boy wrote: I’m just testing the new 20220813 branch end encounter several issues. Branch of what? I'm assuming F37 or rawhide. One of them is image factory, which I need to install to test building a server image. - - - - - - - - - - < # dnf install imagefactory

Re: about dnf installonlypks

On 7/27/22 18:08, Sérgio Basto wrote: Thanks, I found the issue that I was looking for , in resume kmod- VirtualBox for some reason provides one installonlypkg [1] Because you need one for each installed kernel. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: about dnf installonlypks

On 7/26/22 19:27, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, after searching a lot still can't find how installonlypks package list is generated I found these 2 references : https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html

Re: SELinux help

On 6/26/22 07:54, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 6:13 PM Samuel Sieb <mailto:sam...@sieb.net>> wrote: On 6/25/22 06:59, Richard Shaw wrote: > Fail2ban works fine in F35 but now has an SELinux problem in F36[1]... > > While not a SELinux

Re: SELinux help

On 6/25/22 06:59, Richard Shaw wrote: Fail2ban works fine in F35 but now has an SELinux problem in F36[1]... While not a SELinux expert I can often reason things out but the "unconfined" stuff confuses me. type=AVC msg=audit(1655618425.791:3076): avc:  denied  { connectto } for  

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 5/10/22 06:29, Ben Cotton wrote: According to developers, the non-portbale JDK is causing upredicted behavior different from other JDK vendors Similar to what Kevin has mentioned, I've also been using the Fedora openjdk builds for work for many years with no issues in a very large

Re: How much free space in /var is required for upgrades?

On 5/16/22 05:06, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 6:39 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: Rpm has had a heuristic on the rpmdb growth for years, but no heuristics can help against unexpected events eating the space. An in-place system upgrade is not an "unexpected event". It is a

Re: Would it be useful to have a video call to discuss the "Deprecate Legacy BIOS" Change proposal?

On 4/14/22 15:53, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 14.4.2022 22:24, Nikolay Nikolov wrote: On 4/14/22 23:49, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 14.4.2022 18:20, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Robbie Harwood said: Given there is consensus that legacy BIOS is on its way out I don't think

Re: Would it be useful to have a video call to discuss the "Deprecate Legacy BIOS" Change proposal?

On 4/13/22 07:54, David Cantrell wrote: The core issue still comes down to having resources to continue maintaining BIOS boot support in Fedora and so far no one has come forward to work on that. As far as I can tell from the responses in the other thread, there is not currently an issue with

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/8/22 12:07, Jared Dominguez wrote: If the experience is buggy with Windows too, HP probably has addressed that as previously stated, which is why I asked about how up-to-date Samuel's BIOS is. On several occasions I've seen complaints about firmware issues that are solved by updating.

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/8/22 08:46, Jared Dominguez wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 19:46 Samuel Sieb <mailto:sam...@sieb.net>> wrote: This is not comparable to the 32-bit removal where it was only a few really old systems.  This is going to affect decent systems that are less than 10 years old

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/7/22 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:21 PM Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: syslinux (really isolinux) is only used on installation media. It's commonly used for BIOS PXE booting as well. *shudders at the memories of dealing with pxelinux*

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/7/22 14:51, Jared Dominguez wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:49 PM Samuel Sieb <mailto:sam...@sieb.net>> wrote: On 4/7/22 08:02, Jared Dominguez wrote: > This is a proposal. Nothing has changed yet. The choice is now whether > to go forward with it o

Re: F37 Change: Legacy Xorg Driver Removal (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/7/22 13:04, JT wrote: How will this affect Desktop Developers who are still reliant on x for their DE/WM to work? For example, I dont have the needed bits in Lumina for it to work with Wayland. I'm asking because I dont know how this will or won't affect me and other desktops in a similar

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/7/22 08:02, Jared Dominguez wrote: This is a proposal. Nothing has changed yet. The choice is now whether to go forward with it or come together with a cohesive alternative, including one of the two listed in the proposal. But we need a solution that accounts for the existing maintainers

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/6/22 19:30, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Reading the comments, it seems the overlooked word is “depreciated” meaning users will have time to properly transition their hardware. No, the problem is that saying it's "deprecated" is misleading. If you can only upgrade a system and can't

Re: Possible regression in GNOME in Fedora 36 Branched 20220401.n.0

On 4/3/22 16:45, Ian Laurie wrote: I noticed in VirtualBox with GNOME and 20220401.n.0 that if I resized the VM window when logged into GNOME it slammed me back to the  greeter, apparently without killing my login session. What video device does VirtualBox provide to the OS?

Re: abrt bugzilla integration not working

On 3/21/22 02:25, Michal Srb wrote: so 19. 3. 2022 o 23:53 Samuel Sieb <mailto:sam...@sieb.net>> napísal(a): I just tried to file an abrt report.  It asked me to create an API key for bugzilla, which I did.  But in the end, when it tried to talk to bugzilla, it got

abrt bugzilla integration not working

I just tried to file an abrt report. It asked me to create an API key for bugzilla, which I did. But in the end, when it tried to talk to bugzilla, it got an error. Does the abrt plugin need to be updated for the recent bugzilla changes? I have the latest version and there are no pending

Re: Orphaning deltarpm

On 3/14/22 15:23, John Reiser wrote: On 3/14/22 12:23, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/14/22 09:34, John Reiser wrote: Just setting `deltarpm` to False in dnf.conf do the same. Just saying. The deltarpm option has low discoverability.  The information is available, but the discovery chain is too

Re: Orphaning deltarpm

On 3/14/22 09:34, John Reiser wrote: Just setting `deltarpm` to False in dnf.conf do the same. Just saying. The deltarpm option has low discoverability.  The information is available, but the discovery chain is too long and not explicit enough. The main configuration file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf

Re: QEMU-kvm installation a dependency hell?

On 3/13/22 13:45, Peter Boy wrote: I just checked installation of qemu-kvm & libvirt & virt-install on a Fedora Server Edition, that is a headless server. It installed 338 packages / 158 mb including poppler, mesa, wayland, libX11, gtk3, cairo and a lot of additional graphic related

Re: RPM spec feedback directly in your editor

On 2/23/22 08:54, Andreas Schneider wrote: On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 7:41:16 PM CET Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: error: Unable to open /dev/stdin: No such device or address How about "/proc/self/fd/0"? Nope doesn't work ... /dev/stdin is a symlink to /proc/self/fd/0. I wonder if this is

Re: some dnf dependency quirks in rawhide?

On 2/7/22 01:00, Marius Schwarz wrote: Am 06.02.22 um 22:43 schrieb Fabio Valentini: On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 10:34 PM Marius Schwarz wrote: Hi, deinstalling the rpmfusion package "pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld", which should not be required by anything: [root@fedorapine ~]# rpm -q

Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec

On 1/26/22 09:50, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:10:34AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 26/01/2022 07:40, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: One of suggestions is making a package containing a set of 10 Fedora release wallpaper. The issue will be the increase of file size as

Re: is there an offshoot or branch of early Fedora for simple UI

On 1/9/22 14:43, None Business wrote: I use(d) fedora to run my IDEs ( c++), now it is all floating-contracting windows , with gazilion 'drag-your-window' nonsense . I guess I am not cool enough to use this clusterfu..k, it is simply unusable for me , so I am looking for something that looks

Re: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 12/28/21 16:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 4:35 AM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Il 28/12/21 04:28, Kevin Kofler via devel ha scritto: But even off by default, I do not see how the "feature" implemented by this Change provides any value at all that does not

Re: compiling qmplay2 21.12.24 fails on Fedora 35 with Internal error (Segmentation fault).

On 12/27/21 03:37, Martin Gansser wrote: {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}: Internal error (Segmentation fault). Please report this bug. Any hints ? If it's repeatable, I would suggest following that message. ___ devel mailing

Re: new systemd in rawhide

On 12/10/21 08:15, Ralf Corsépius wrote: Am 10.12.21 um 15:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: Some other replies in this thread assumed that the programs will crash. I have no idea why you would assume that. If properly implemented, such programs typically won't crash, they will "just not

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 12/6/21 09:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 12:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:59:05AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Correct me, if I'm wrong, people to avoid put password in every sudo command, modify sudo to not ask password .  And this behavior is a

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 12/1/21 08:13, mkol...@redhat.com wrote: AFAIK it always added the user to the wheel group. AFAIK there is just one special root account and you can't change its username. You can change the root username. Some people have done that for security purposes. However, it's possible that some

Re: /usr/bin/ld.so as a symbolic link for the dynamic loader

On 12/2/21 15:08, Sérgio Basto wrote: I didn't understood . What is the difference for /lib64/ld-2.33.so or /lib/ld-2.33.so ? The lib64 one is 64-bit and the lib one is 32-bit. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Unowned system directories

On 11/24/21 06:34, Steve Grubb wrote: And, I was also very surprised to find 10's of gigabytes of data in $HOME/.cache/debuginfod_client I don't know how it got there, why it's so big, or how to limit it. I believe that would be abrt/gdb downloading debuginfo to create a stack trace for

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 11/8/21 01:23, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: On 11/7/21 12:15 AM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 2021-11-06 21:15, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with high data expenses. So i feel turning it

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

On 11/6/21 15:46, Marius Schwarz wrote: Am 11.08.21 um 22:03 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: - there is also argument that people's connection bandwidth nowadays     tends to be fast enough to make the package rebuilding actually     slower than downloading the whole package (but that

Re: Impossible to upgrade to F35 due to dependency issues with pam_mount and cryptsetup

On 10/31/21 04:57, Julian Sikorski wrote: I had some time today so I decided to try updating to F35 ahead of the release. It did not work unfortunately: Error:  Problem 2: problem with installed package pam_mount-2.16-12.fc34.x86_64   - package pam_mount-2.16-12.fc34.x86_64 requires

Re: Fedora 35 status and testing needed

On 2021-10-25 01:21, Jun Aruga wrote: I might find the issues about installation with the Fedora 35 64-bit network install image. How and where can I report it? Is the beta installation too old to test now? Thanks. https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/ The test list

Re: update F34 - f35 postgresql module issue

On 10/23/21 14:40, Peter Boy wrote: I just tested the dnf upgrade procedure on one of our standby backup systems which happens to have the F34 postgresql module version 9.6 installed. The module was overwritten with version 13 without warning. Given the data incompatibility, this is a very

Re: Removing kernel removes deps?

On 2021-09-19 12:25 p.m., old sixpack13 wrote: On 9/19/21 06:29, Richard Shaw wrote: Just remove kernel-core. That should remove all the other kernel packages specific to that kernel version, but not the headers. I've seen kernel-devel was left on box too after only running sudo dnf remove

Re: Removing kernel removes deps?

On 9/19/21 06:29, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 3:19 AM Samuel Sieb <mailto:sam...@sieb.net>> wrote: On 2021-09-18 12:54 p.m., Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sat, 2021-09-18 at 14:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >>   kernel-headers

Re: Removing kernel removes deps?

On 2021-09-18 12:54 p.m., Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sat, 2021-09-18 at 14:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:  kernel-headers  x86_64                                        5.15.0- 0.rc1.git0.1.fc36                                          @rawhide                  5.5 M IIRC you have to

Re: F35 3x slower boot than F34

On 2021-09-05 12:19 a.m., Peter Boy wrote: Much to my chagrin, you describe the biggest problem in Fedora for years and the one why Fedora is falling further and further behind among distributions. The problem overshadows all that many positive features that otherwise distinguish Fedora.

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-08-02 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On 2021-08-03 2:48 a.m., Silvia Sánchez wrote: So I set up the server and Fedora meetings, but I got this error:  Server silver.libera.chat (Version solanum-1.0-dev), User modes: DGQRSZaghilopsuwz, Channel modes: CFILMPQSbcefgijklmnopqrstuvz [11:46] [Support] Lailah ETRACE FNC SAFELIST

Re: Is the chromium debuginfo package exists?

On 2021-07-25 2:38 p.m., Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: Is the chromium debuginfo package exists? Quick searching in repos didn't find any debuginfo packages for chromium. There haven't been any debuginfo packages for chromium for at least a very long time. I assume it's disabled for some reason.

Re: F35 Change: libffi 3.4 (late System-Wide Change proposal)

On 7/14/21 11:28 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: == Upgrade/compatibility impact == Packages built on the previous version of libffi will have an auto-requires on the old SONAME and will cause dnf to install libffi3.1 (compat package with runtime). When packages are rebuilt against libffi 3.4 they will

Re: ibus-typing-boster - testcase instruction error

On 2021-07-08 3:27 p.m., Per Bothner wrote: First, a problem in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_ibus-typing-booster It suggests: dnf install pyhunspell-python3 However, that doesn't work: $ sudo dnf install pyhunspell-python Last metadata expiration check: 1:12:44 ago on Thu 08

Re: Friday , May 28 unattended update broke amdgpu DKMS building

On 5/29/21 5:38 AM, eedio wrote: I was on unattended updates and Friday afternoon the Radeon RS780 machine rebooted into minimal resolution mode and can no longer go to full HD resolution. I put the disk into an old laptop with intel GPU where the DKMS modules amdgpu cannot build properly,

Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

On 2021-05-27 2:28 p.m., Sam Varshavchik wrote: It a shame if Fedora were to abandon its long-time users. This proposal was already brough up earlier this year and was described as a non-starter back then. I haven't paid attention and I hope this is still a non-starter; otherwise, as I said,

Re: sudo dnf remove gtk3

On 2021-05-22 6:07 p.m., Reon Beon via devel wrote: No, why doesn't it depend on gtk4? Really, I don't know. It should, no? In F33, I don't even have gtk4 installed, so nothing in the default workstation (or anything else I've added) uses it yet.

Re: When is pappl going to be good enough to replace cups?

On 2021-05-20 2:09 p.m., Reon Beon via devel wrote: Thoughts? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pappl My reading of that is that it's something that works with cups, not replaces it. Apparently we're supposed to use printer applications now instead of printer drivers.

Re: Wayland and basic graphics mode

On 5/5/21 9:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: Do we want to support a "basic graphics mode"? If so (which I think we do), are there any alternatives to disabling KMS entirely that we could use? Perhaps vkms[2] is an option? If not, what do we do about it? [2]:

Re: nokey warning during F33->F34 upgrade (fstrm package)

On 2021-05-01 2:42 a.m., Germano Massullo wrote: Il 30/04/21 18:33, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 02:19:31PM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote: After running dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=34 and downloading all files, I got the following warning warning:

Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature

On 3/13/21 6:39 AM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: [root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#3860 Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected b9cf6988fce9f83cb6cbddc260ab4832a15af3e718884156e0c73ba344897c27 !=

  1   2   3   4   5   >