Re: Should breathe package be called python-breathe?

2016-03-26 Thread Dave Johansen
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Jonathan Underwood < jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 March 2016 at 05:14, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 21:23 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313796 > >>

Re: Should breathe package be called python-breathe?

2016-03-23 Thread Jonathan Underwood
On 23 March 2016 at 05:14, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 21:23 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313796 >> This request to include a Python 3 subpackage for breathe made me realize >> that I probably should

Re: Should breathe package be called python-breathe?

2016-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 21:23 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313796 > This request to include a Python 3 subpackage for breathe made me realize > that I probably should have named the package python-breathe instead of > breathe. Is that correct? If so,

Should breathe package be called python-breathe?

2016-03-22 Thread Dave Johansen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313796 This request to include a Python 3 subpackage for breathe made me realize that I probably should have named the package python-breathe instead of breathe. Is that correct? If so, what's the right way to fix this? Thanks, Dave -- devel mailing