On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:14 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-08-27 5:41 a.m., Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Yeah, that's why I was thinking of arbitrarily grouping them into sets
> > of 10
> > releases. That keeps it from becoming *infinitely huge* over time.
>
> Say fedora-backgrounds is an
On 2021-08-27 5:41 a.m., Matthew Miller wrote:
Yeah, that's why I was thinking of arbitrarily grouping them into sets
of 10
releases. That keeps it from becoming *infinitely huge* over time.
Say fedora-backgrounds is an umbrella package containing a set of
fxx-backgrounds as subpackages.
On Friday, 27 August 2021 18.31.36 WEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The other resource issue here is that when you modify the package to add
> the new wallpapers, everyone who has any of the old ones installed will
> need to pointlessly update them for the version change.
>
> But since that would only
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:41:27AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 02:24:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > One big downside of this approach would be *absolutely huge* sources
> > > (all wallpapers since
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:41:27AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 02:24:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > One big downside of this approach would be *absolutely huge* sources
> > (all wallpapers since ancient Fedora), even if split into multiple
> > tarballs.
> > The
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 02:24:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> One big downside of this approach would be *absolutely huge* sources
> (all wallpapers since ancient Fedora), even if split into multiple
> tarballs.
> The way it's done today, only wallpapers for *one* fedora release have
> to be
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:22:04PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Currently, the spec file has subpackages for each desktop environment
> > though (e.g. f35-backgrounds-gnome, f35-backgrounds-kde, etc.) since they
> > have to be installed in different places for each background. How
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:22 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew
> > >
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew
> > Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >True. But those subpackages could just be built from
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew
> Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >True. But those subpackages could just be built from one source
> >package:
> >
> >fedora-backgrounds/f34 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..34
Good answers
On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 10:51 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 10:03, Stephen Snow wrote:
> >
> > From my user POV,
> > I never understood why backgrounds were versioned specific to the
> > release number of Fedora Linux in the first place. I mean, is it
>
On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
True. But those subpackages could just be built from one source
package:
fedora-backgrounds/f34 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..34
fedora-backgrounds/f35 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..35
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 02:45:18PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 08. 21 14:40, Link Dupont wrote:
> >Wouldn't a source package named 'fedora-backgrounds' work?
Yes please!
> >Each
> >branch in dist-git would allow for new wallpapers each release. An
> >RPM using the Fedora version as its
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 10:03, Stephen Snow wrote:
>
> From my user POV,
> I never understood why backgrounds were versioned specific to the
> release number of Fedora Linux in the first place. I mean, is it
> actually a separate repo each time? Wouldn't it make sense to just call
> it
From my user POV,
I never understood why backgrounds were versioned specific to the
release number of Fedora Linux in the first place. I mean, is it
actually a separate repo each time? Wouldn't it make sense to just call
it backgrounds?
Just asking
Stephen
On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 09:23 -0400,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 08:40:49AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote:
> * fedora-backgrounds/f34 => fedora-backgrounds-34-1.fc34
> * fedora-backgrounds/f35 => fedora-backgrounds-35-1.fc35
> * fedora-backgrounds/f35 => fedora-backgrounds-35-2.fc35
> But I must be missing something; this seems like its way
Could those be collected into an archive somewhere? Like
fedora-backgrounds-extras or something similar? This would be a
significant change to the way backgrounds are packaged.
On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 02:45:18 PM +0200, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
On 26. 08. 21 14:40, Link Dupont wrote:
Wouldn't a
On 26. 08. 21 14:40, Link Dupont wrote:
Wouldn't a source package named 'fedora-backgrounds' work? Each branch in
dist-git would allow for new wallpapers each release. An RPM using the Fedora
version as its version would result in an NVR that clearly identifies the
wallpapers:
*
Wouldn't a source package named 'fedora-backgrounds' work? Each branch
in dist-git would allow for new wallpapers each release. An RPM using
the Fedora version as its version would result in an NVR that clearly
identifies the wallpapers:
* fedora-backgrounds/f34 =>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:48:45PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Back when we were distributing source RPM DVDs, there was a reason to have a
> new package every release, so the files for the older releases weren't
> taking up space. But since we don't do that much anymore, maybe it would be
>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:18:39PM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> f35-backgrounds is ready for review which is trivia to do. It is
> needed for the beta release along desktop-background.
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997854
Back when we were distributing source
Hello team,
f35-backgrounds is ready for review which is trivia to do. It is needed
for the beta release along desktop-background.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997854
Thanks in advance
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
23 matches
Mail list logo
