Re: LXQt Spin: packages not updated since April 2022

to start. I cannot put much more on my schedule at the moment ;) However, if the SIG and the related maintainers cannot handle the LXQt packages at the moment either, it might be worth to discuss removing it from the promoted Spins list for now, doesn't it? Finally, the issue here is not just

Re: LXQt Spin: packages not updated since April 2022

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Christopher Klooz via devel wrote: > > Hi, > > I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after > updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0, > which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0. > > I

LXQt Spin: packages not updated since April 2022

Hi, I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0, which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0. I read the LXQt team does not maintain itself, and 1.2.0 and 1.3.0 seem to not contain critical

Re: F38 proposal: LXQt image for aarch64 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 03:39:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > == How To Test == > > Install using the ISO or the disk image on aarch64 system. The system > should work as it should be by manually installing on top of any > existing aarch64 system. Does our QA have the necessary resources

F38 proposal: LXQt image for aarch64 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Committee. == Summary == Generate LXQt image (both iso and disk image) for aarch64 architecture. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt has moved out of 0.x version and is now 1.1.0, so I consider it to be a pretty stable

F38 proposal: LXQt image for aarch64 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Committee. == Summary == Generate LXQt image (both iso and disk image) for aarch64 architecture. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt has moved out of 0.x version and is now 1.1.0, so I consider it to be a pretty stable

Heads-up: Soname bumps for LXQt related libraries

Hi, I plan to merge LXQt 1.1.0 into Rawhide on Monday. This will cause the follow so-name bumps %{_libdir}/libfm-qt.so.11 %{_libdir}/libfm-qt.so.11.0.0 %{_libdir}/liblxqt.so.1 %{_libdir}/liblxqt.so.1.1.0 %{_libdir}/libQt5Xdg.so.3 %{_libdir}/libQt5Xdg.so.3.9.0 %{_libdir}/libQt5XdgIconLoader.so

F37 proposal: LXQt 1.1.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

. == Summary == Update LXQt to 1.1.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt 1.1.0 released with a bunch of bugfixes and new features including but not limited to Qt6 integration, appearance changes etc. It's always

F37 proposal: LXQt 1.1.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

. == Summary == Update LXQt to 1.1.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt 1.1.0 released with a bunch of bugfixes and new features including but not limited to Qt6 integration, appearance changes etc. It's always

Re: Heads-up: lxqt libraries soname bump

On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 2:44 AM Ian McInerney via devel wrote: >> >> Did you run the build for lxqt-wallet? I see that there is a commit in >> distgit that bumps the version to 1.0.0, but I can't find an associated >> build in Koji for that version. I actually think th

Re: Heads-up: lxqt libraries soname bump

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 11:37 AM Ian McInerney wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Zamir SUN wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built >> the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104. > > > D

Re: Heads-up: lxqt libraries soname bump

Apparently there were soname bumps in other lxqt packages that were updated other than just those two. The qtermwidget package appears to have had an soname bump from libqtermwidget5.so.0 to libqtermwidget5.so.1, breaking at least TexStudio in Rawhide. I did a build for it, and it has been pushed

Re: Heads-up: lxqt libraries soname bump

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Zamir SUN wrote: > Hi, > > I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built > the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104. Did you run the build for lxqt-wallet? I see that there is a commit in distgit that bumps

Re: Heads-up: lxqt libraries soname bump

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 06:37:59PM +0800, Zamir SUN wrote: > Hi, > > I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built the > packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104. The following package > contains library with a soname bump > > liblxqt (li

Heads-up: lxqt libraries soname bump

Hi, I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104. The following package contains library with a soname bump liblxqt (liblxqt.so.1) liblxqt-globalkeys (liblxqt-globalkeys.so.1,liblxqt-globalkeys-ui.so.1) I hope I

F36 Change: LXQt 1.0.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_1.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 1.0.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt 1.0.0 released with a bunch of bugfixes and new features. It's always good to keep

F36 Change: LXQt 1.0.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_1.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 1.0.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt 1.0.0 released with a bunch of bugfixes and new features. It's always good to keep

The future of a Fedora LXQT Spin on Raspberry 3+?

I've been using LXQT on my rasp3+ since f33 and even forgot I successfully upgraded to f34 on 03/24/21, but can't find an f34 image. Is there an image available for f34 and will one be made available for f35? Joe ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Fedora 34 Change: LXQt 0.16.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.16.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 0.16.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt just released with a bunch of bugfixes. It's always good to keep Fedora users

Fedora 34 Change: LXQt 0.16.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.16.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 0.16.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt just released with a bunch of bugfixes. It's always good to keep Fedora users

Re: LXQT: FTBFS Requires

Ok, I’ll fix them. > 7 авг. 2020 г., в 14:28, Mamoru TASAKA написал(а): > > Евгений Пивнев wrote on 2020/08/07 20:07: >> 1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?) >> 2. they are incompilable now in f33 >> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu

Re: LXQT: FTBFS Requires

Евгений Пивнев wrote on 2020/08/07 20:07: 1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?) 2. they are incompilable now in f33 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1

Re: LXQT: FTBFS Requires

> 1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?) > 2. they are incompilable now in f33 > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864039) > 3. but lqxt-0.15.0 built ok without them (?) > > So, the question is

LXQT: FTBFS Requires

1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?) 2. they are incompilable now in f33 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864039 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

Re: Default editor for LXQt spin

Hi Zamir, thanks and no problem. I even forgot about this issue. Regards Raphael Am 24.06.20 um 14:47 schrieb Zamir SUN: On 12/11/18 7:52 AM, Raphael Groner wrote: Hi, writing to general devel list intentionally. No idea if all members of lxqt-sig list can read here, too and especially

Re: Default editor for LXQt spin

On 12/11/18 7:52 AM, Raphael Groner wrote: Hi, writing to general devel list intentionally. No idea if all members of lxqt-sig list can read here, too and especially @zsun. Hi Raphael I'm realy sorry, there are too many emails in devel so when I am not on cc list it's high chance that I

Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: LXQt 0.15.0

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.15.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 0.15.0 or later in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt 0.15.0 just released with a bunch of bugfixes and enhancements. It's always

Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: LXQt 0.15.0

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.15.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 0.15.0 or later in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt 0.15.0 just released with a bunch of bugfixes and enhancements. It's always

F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: LXQt 0.14.0

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.14.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 0.14.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt just released with a bunch of bugfixes. It's always good to keep Fedora users

F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: LXQt 0.14.0

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.14.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 0.14.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt just released with a bunch of bugfixes. It's always good to keep Fedora users

Default editor for LXQt spin

Hi, writing to general devel list intentionally. No idea if all members of lxqt-sig list can read here, too and especially @zsun. Is there any sense why @lxqt-sig is member of packaging for featherpad? LXQt SIG decided to have enki in the spin as the default editor. Featherpad is not part

Re: Request for joining LxQT SIG

On 08/05/2018 12:38 AM, Christian Dersch wrote: > Hi, > > awesome! The themes are a seperate point, yes. Please note that libfm-qt > released a bugfix 0.13.1. In any case, your work is fine so I'll give > you access to lxqt-sig FAS group, which means you'll have commit acces

Re: Request for joining LxQT SIG

Hi, awesome! The themes are a seperate point, yes. Please note that libfm-qt released a bugfix 0.13.1. In any case, your work is fine so I'll give you access to lxqt-sig FAS group, which means you'll have commit access to the LXQt specific packages. Greetings, Christian On 08/04/2018 05:58 PM

Re: Request for joining LxQT SIG

Hi Christian, As we talked on IRC yesterday, I build the LxQT 0.13.0 packages in my copr[1]. All the spec files can be found here[2]. I installed it on top of Fedora Rawhide and did a screenshot[3] to prove it basically works. And since this works, I will ask one of the libqtxdg maintainer

Request for joining LxQT SIG

Hi all, Sorry for cross-posting. As I mentioned in this thread[1], I want to get libqtxdg updated in Fedora. However this will affect LxQT. $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires libqtxdg Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fzug-free', disabling. Last metadata expiration check: 1:31:27 ago

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

rement for lxqt-sig access to LXQt packages). So you need to be > sponsored as a packager first to be able to build and maintain official > Fedora packages, check > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > > But a first step would be playing with LXQ

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

Hi again :) I don't see you in packager group in FAS (which is a requirement for lxqt-sig access to LXQt packages). So you need to be sponsored as a packager first to be able to build and maintain official Fedora packages, check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

Yes i am already a packager,i can do this then On Fri, 20 Jul 2018, 21:30 Christian Dersch, wrote: > Hi, > > are you already a packager? The work is mostly updating packages, besides > that one important part is the theming of LXQt (usage of Fedora wallpaper > etc.) and fina

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

Hi, are you already a packager? The work is mostly updating packages, besides that one important part is the theming of LXQt (usage of Fedora wallpaper etc.) and finally maintaining the live spin. Packaging is the most important topic. Greetings, Christian On 07/20/2018 04:44 PM, Manas

Re: Resigning from LXQt maintainance

for intel optimized kernel for fedora. On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: > Hi all, > > as some of you might have recognized, Fedora's LXQt is quite outdated (we > have 0.11, current one for some weeks now is 0.13) and also needs some > rework with res

Resigning from LXQt maintainance

Hi all, as some of you might have recognized, Fedora's LXQt is quite outdated (we have 0.11, current one for some weeks now is 0.13) and also needs some rework with respect to theming and the package set (upstream restructured packaging a bit with respect to common files). When I joined

Re: lxqt install group environment - bug ?

I install all mesa drivers for i686 , 64 and omx the startx command get this error: xf86EnableIOPorts : failed to set IOPL for I/O ... maybe is virtualbox problem , but this error is just on lxqt environment . the lxde and xfce environments works well. I don't have any idea if this is a bug

Re: lxqt install group environment - bug ?

Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > I try to install lxqt desktop group environment > I use the last Fedora Server image from Fedora > > The error on default user point to xorg error : > > xf86EnableIOPorts - EGL_MESA_drm_image require > > This is strange because the lxde d

lxqt install group environment - bug ?

I try to install lxqt desktop group environment I use the last Fedora Server image from Fedora The error on default user point to xorg error : xf86EnableIOPorts - EGL_MESA_drm_image require This is strange because the lxde desktop environment group running well on machine. Maybe is a bug

Re: Odd message when escalating priveledge with sudo - F27 - LXQt - QTerminal ( Apologies if wrong list )

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:58:35 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:36:33PM -, Zach Villers wrote: > > I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet; > > > > [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su > >

Re: Odd message when escalating priveledge with sudo - F27 - LXQt - QTerminal ( Apologies if wrong list )

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:36:33PM -, Zach Villers wrote: > I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet; > > [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su > /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.bin: line 1 error due to: > Non-ASCII characters found >

Odd message when escalating priveledge with sudo - F27 - LXQt - QTerminal ( Apologies if wrong list )

I just saw this and haven't had time to search Bugzilla yet; [jkrong@masada ~]$ sudo su /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.bin: line 1 error due to: Non-ASCII characters found /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.homedirs.bin: line 1 error due to: Non-ASCII

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin

Hi everyone, I created a blog entry about the current state: https://lupinix.blogspot.de/2017/01/lxqt-spin-proposed-for-fedora-26-new.html Greetings, Christian On 01/16/2017 02:00 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin

LXDE spin will exist until its maintainer will stop it, LXQt is independent from LXDE spin. So nobody is forced to change ;) Also both projects are maintained upstream so there is no reason to drop anything here. On 01/16/2017 02:54 PM, William Moreno wrote: This new spin will be coexisting

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin

This new spin will be coexisting with the current lxde spin? Or users of the lxde spin will need to move to lxqt? Is the second option is valid there will be a smooth update process via the dnf system upgrade tool? El 16/1/2017 7:01 a. m., "Jan Kurik" <jku...@redhat.com> escribi

F26 Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin

= Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt Spin = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_Spin Change owner(s): * Christian Dersch A Fedora Spin providing the LXQt desktop environment. == Detailed Description == LXQt is a lightweight Qt-based desktop environment. Fedora provides it since

the application lxqt

in my opinion lacks the two applications is lxqt-admin obconf-qt -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: lxqt

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 23:41:01 - " mastaiza" <mastaiza...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a dead end that no one knows what to do. I wouldn't say that, I think its just that we couldn't figure out what your actual issue was or how to direct you. How did you install lxqt?

Re: lxqt

Am 24.12.2015 um 00:41 schrieb mastaiza: This is a dead end that no one knows what to do what about senseful quoting so that one could know what you are talking about? a subject "Re: lxqt" implies you are responding to something signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: lxqt

This is a dead end that no one knows what to do. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: lxqt

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293655 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: lxqt

This is not a problem, it is a problem with lxqt, there dont have a working polkit gui setup out of the box. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: lxqt

This is not a yumex-dnf issue, it works fine in other DE's, Other lxqt users have had this issue, I don't know what the solution is Tim On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 at 10:13 mastaiza <mastaiza...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is not a problem, it is a problem with lxqt, there dont have a > workin

Re: lxqt

On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 05:23:48 - " mastaiza" <mastaiza...@gmail.com> wrote: > When you install through yumex-dnf not a window to enter the password. > I'm not exactly sure but lacks the components lxqt-sudo lxqt-admin I'm not sure I understand what you are asking he

lxqt

When you install through yumex-dnf not a window to enter the password. I'm not exactly sure but lacks the components lxqt-sudo lxqt-admin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

= Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt Change owner(s): Helio Chissini de Castro heliocas...@fedoraproject.org, Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org Package the LXQt desktop Environment for Fedora. * This Change is announced after

F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

= Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt Change owner(s): Helio Chissini de Castro heliocas...@fedoraproject.org, Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org Package the LXQt desktop Environment for Fedora. * This Change is announced after

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

On Feb 24, 2015 2:57 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: LXQt = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt Change owner(s): Helio Chissini de Castro heliocas...@fedoraproject.org , Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org Package the LXQt

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

Yes We're about to finish last integration part, that is pcmanfm-qt, and with Qt 5.4.1 arriving, the previous drag and drop issues that plagued 0.9.0 release will be solved ( not LXQt fault ). For the spin, we had a small discussion on default applications, with are a mixed feeling between keep

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

On 24.02.2015 17:19, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: Yes We're about to finish last integration part, that is pcmanfm-qt, and with Qt 5.4.1 arriving, the previous drag and drop issues that plagued 0.9.0 release will be solved ( not LXQt fault ). For the spin, we had a small discussion

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

Yep, Qupzilla appeared on the list, but there's one single impeditive for me: Qt4 All LXQt for now is Qt5 based. []'s On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote: On 24.02.2015 17:19, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: Yes We're about to finish last integration

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: LXQt

On 24.02.2015 17:48, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: Yep, Qupzilla appeared on the list, but there's one single impeditive for me: Qt4 All LXQt for now is Qt5 based. Qupzilla should also built on Qt5, judging i.e. from [1]. [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/qupzilla