Re: Preparing for the New DIP Process

2024-01-20 Thread zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 07:51:00 UTC, zjh wrote: You don't know the `pain `of not having a certain feature, And this feature has already been `implemented`, even without `any side effects`! They just ignore you!

Re: Preparing for the New DIP Process

2024-01-20 Thread zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 07:46:07 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote: What? I'm sorry, but being happy with module level != not caring about others. Jordan You don't know the `pain `of not having a certain feature,

Re: Preparing for the New DIP Process

2024-01-20 Thread Jordan Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 07:36:31 UTC, zjh wrote: On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 07:11:50 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote: I think it's fair to say most people where happy (or neutral) with the status quo, and were not convinced by the pro-class-level arguments. So there are very few people

Re: Preparing for the New DIP Process

2024-01-20 Thread zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 07:36:31 UTC, zjh wrote: So there are very few people in the D community. If you don't care about others, they don't care about you. [here](https://github.com/opendlang/opend/pull/30) A small feature that has no side effects at all. They are just not merging it.

Re: Preparing for the New DIP Process

2024-01-20 Thread zjh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 21 January 2024 at 07:11:50 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote: I think it's fair to say most people where happy (or neutral) with the status quo, and were not convinced by the pro-class-level arguments. So there are very few people in the D community. If you don't care about others,

Re: Preparing for the New DIP Process

2024-01-20 Thread Jordan Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 22:53:15 UTC, privateWHAT wrote: On Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 07:19:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: * establish support for fleshing out ideas before a DIP is even written It's 2024. That should have been the principle a decade ago Remember how the so called

Re: Beerconf January 2024

2024-01-20 Thread Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 14 January 2024 at 20:29:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: # BEERCONF! The next one will be January 27-28, and I hope to see you all there! Hi everyone! On Saturday the 27th, at 17:00 UTC, github user Chibisi has asked to give a presentation on his project,

PixelPerfectEngine v0.11.0-alpha release

2024-01-20 Thread solidstate1991 via Digitalmars-d-announce
https://github.com/ZILtoid1991/pixelperfectengine/releases/tag/v0.11.0-alpha Two major changes are: 1) Implementation of the M2 format. Due to the lack of any proper MIDI2.0 formats, I decided to implement my own, and also added some additional function which allows it to be used for adaptive

Re: Preparing for the New DIP Process

2024-01-20 Thread privateWHAT via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 22:53:15 UTC, privateWHAT wrote: .. For those newcomers who don't know what that was all about.. https://github.com/dlang/dmd/compare/master...dkorpel:dmd:private-this#diff-8da4a723a20020bf5d1edf1a9f1344eb776c73a0ae35ccee95d3bc24cb0600a7R242

Re: Preparing for the New DIP Process

2024-01-20 Thread privateWHAT via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 07:19:19 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: * establish support for fleshing out ideas before a DIP is even written It's 2024. That should have been the principle a decade ago Remember how the so called 'discussions' about the 'privateThis' concept always got heaped

Re: Redub: A faster build system promising 90% compatibility with dub

2024-01-20 Thread ryuukk_ via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 15:25:35 UTC, Renato wrote: On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 14:14:10 UTC, Hipreme wrote: - I have tried contributing to dub's project on parallelization, I waste 1 week trying that and could not get it working, so, I decided it would be a better use of my time

Re: Redub: A faster build system promising 90% compatibility with dub

2024-01-20 Thread Hipreme via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 15:25:35 UTC, Renato wrote: On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 14:14:10 UTC, Hipreme wrote: - I have tried contributing to dub's project on parallelization, I waste 1 week trying that and could not get it working, so, I decided it would be a better use of my time

Re: Redub: A faster build system promising 90% compatibility with dub

2024-01-20 Thread Renato via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 14:14:10 UTC, Hipreme wrote: - I have tried contributing to dub's project on parallelization, I waste 1 week trying that and could not get it working, so, I decided it would be a better use of my time into rewriting a completely new dub which would focus on

Redub: A faster build system promising 90% compatibility with dub

2024-01-20 Thread Hipreme via Digitalmars-d-announce
Hello, people. Here I come announce a package I've just released: # [**redub**](https://code.dlang.org/packages/redub) : A faster build system based on dub It is meant to be an almost drop-in replacement on dub. Right now, I've been implementing only features that dub already has. But in the