[digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F

2010-01-04 Thread Tony
All, Recent path simulation tests indicate that Nino Porcino's PSK63F offers better performance over PSK31 and PSK63 in a couple of areas. The most significant improvement is it's ability to endure Doppler spread found on paths that cross the polar ionosphere. Both PSK31 and PSK63 fail

Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F

2010-01-04 Thread Phil Williams
Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31 under the same test scenarios? Certainly, there would be more a in throughput, but that is a matter of some liberal use of CW shorthand. philw de ka1gmn On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: All, Recent path simulation tests

Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F

2010-01-04 Thread W6IDS
PSK63F is within the STREAM download? I saw references to it in the reference documentation, but it's unclear to me if it is actually in the application you download. Howard W6IDS Richmond, IN EM79 - Original Message - From: Tony d...@optonline.net To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com

Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F

2010-01-04 Thread Wes Cosand
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:14 AM, W6IDS w6...@verizon.net wrote: PSK63F is within the STREAM download? I saw references to it in the reference documentation, but it's unclear to me if it is actually in the application you download. Howard W6IDS Richmond, IN EM79 Yep, it is there under

Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F + PSKFEC31

2010-01-04 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Phil, According to my measures (under gaussian noise), PSKFEC31 has a minimum S/N of -14.5 dB (2.5 dB better than PSK63F) but the speed is twice weaker (28 wpm). It includes a FEC system (bit based) which permits to have a more robust mode than PSK31 (about 5 times less errors than

Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F + PSKFEC31

2010-01-04 Thread Phil Williams
Patrick, Thank you for the information. If throughput is one the metrics for this comparision then I clearly see your point. The argument of reduced character set in PSKFEC31 is a little difficult as it looked like Tony was not considering that particular metric as his comparsion include RTTY

[digitalradio] Re: com ports winxp-pro all in use (HRD)

2010-01-04 Thread graham787
Ok Many thanks Have re named com port's and the system is working ... new problem has shown up HRD will communicate via the usb comm port with the ft-897-d ... but I now fine that fldigi and wspr will not . dh ! Tnx- G .. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,

[digitalradio] HRD will communicate FLDIGI and WSPR will 'not' via same port

2010-01-04 Thread graham787
HRD will communicate FLDIGI and WSPR will 'not' via same port (not at the same time of course) Odd problem has occured using a USB to Serial cable for the FT-897-D HRD will communicate normally and control the rig .. BUT Fldigi and Wspr .. now will not communicate

Re: [digitalradio] HRD will communicate FLDIGI and WSPR will 'not' via same port

2010-01-04 Thread Wes Cosand
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:10 PM, graham787 g0...@hotmail.com wrote: HRD will communicate FLDIGI and WSPR will 'not' via same port (not at the same time of course) Odd problem has occured using a USB to Serial cable for the FT-897-D HRD will communicate normally and control the rig ..