--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
Discussion of ROS' legality was allowed to continue because of the
news from ARRL and FCC. The topic will be closed as of 25/2/10 at
1200 UTC. Get you final say in on the issue , if you wish. After
that, leave the topic
Hi, where do you go to download the software?
Thanks--- Bob C WU9Q
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, nietorosdj nietoro...@... wrote:
Please download the latest version.
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:w...@mchsi.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:33 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta
Hi, where do you go to download the software?
Thanks--- Bob C WU9Q
Hi, Sieg,
This mode dont need a tone for the synchronization. Is auto :-)
De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 18:36
Asunto: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta
Tone not for sync of the soft but maybe for others to tune in if you are not
using channels like 3.600, 3.603, ..
_
Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von jose alberto nieto ros
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 18:49
An:
Hello Jose
1. Downloaded the 202 but soft says it is 201 . in the info and on the upper
gui-line
2. Had my first qso last night ... yippie yeah :-D
3. the macrobuttons should be settable by the user (klick on them with right
mouse . a macroeditor starts ..
4. the macobuttons
Download here: http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
And configure the Email menu
Ok for the pilot tone ... what about the rest userselectable macros , f-keys
??
_
Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] Im
Auftrag von jose alberto nieto ros
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 18:49
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: Re:
Patient please. I am working in details more important, please believe in me.
De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 20:46
Asunto: AW: AW: [digitalradio] New ROS Version 2.0.2 beta
Nice email feature. By the way, the version info says v2.1.1 but the exe
file says 1.3.1 ?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM, nietorosdj nietoro...@yahoo.es wrote:
Download here: http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
And configure the Email menu
Bo problem, It is the number by defect. After always i have to rename, but this
time i forgot it :-)
Donwload new version
De: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: jue,25 febrero, 2010 22:37
Asunto: Re: [digitalradio] New
Part 97.3 Definitions defines: SS. Spread-spectrum emissions using
bandwidth-expansion modulation emissions having designators with A, C, D, F, G,
H, J or R as the first symbol; X as the second symbol; X as the third symbol.
Title 47 Sec. 2.201 is the relevant section formally defining these
Bw lower as 3kc and fsk . like many other modes
That is what i think
So legal where 3kc wide/digital is legal so out of cw portion but in the
digiarea
Dg9bfc
Sigi
At a given time if you make a snapshot there is only one tone so bw at a
given short time in lower as 500hz
So it is narrow in a
In fact, ROS is a Multi FSK, like many other modes.
De: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: vie,26 febrero, 2010 01:29
Asunto: AW: [digitalradio] The FCC's definition of Spread Spectrum
Bw lower as
Max d,
The distinction is simple - If the carriers or tones which create the
bandwidth expansion (or spreading), are accomplished by means of a
spreading signal , i.e., a separate code signal, which is independent of
the data , then it is spread spectrum no matter what you would like to
call
If ROS is Multi FSK now, than WHY and WHAT was the intent to call it (SS)
Spread Spectrum?, even as the FCC inplyed that the owner (Jose Albert
Nieto)called it (SS). As much as I would like to use it and knowing that the
FCC will not show up at my door, but they might send me a letter and ask
Sorry, I meant to write, For example in SSB, the RF frequency at any
time is equal to the tone frequency of the voice plus the suppressed
carrier frequency (USB).
I did not mean the tone frequency at any time...etc.
73 - Skip KH6TY
KH6TY wrote:
Max d,
The distinction is simple - If
Russell,
Here is a screen shot, using DigiPan as an audio spectrum analyzer,
comparing MFSK16 (bottom half) with ROS 1 baud (top half). During the
top half of the ROS display, I sent data as six letter N's.
http://home.comcast.net/~hteller/SPECTRUM.JPG
The difference between ROS and MFSK16
Russell,
Here is a screen shot of Olivia 32-1000, which is also a FSK mode.
Notice the pattern at idle and in the middle, where I send six N's.
There is a repetitions pattern, just like in MFSK16, but wider.
http://home.comcast.net/~hteller/OLIVIA32-1000.JPG
What is apparently missing from
Hi Andy, my name is Dave and my call is W8RIT. I do not know of any recent
advances in technology regarding public service V/UHF scanning. The most recent
upgrade in this area is relatively old, approx 5 years or so. This is the APCO
Project-25 digital format.
It is used pretty extensively here
KH6TY wrote:
The difference between ROS and MFSK16 at idle (i.e. no data input), is
that MFSK16 has repetitive carriers in a pattern, but the ROS idle has
no repetitive pattern and when data is input, the pattern still
appears to be random. Note the additional carriers when I send six
letter
Surely the decoding and other things are more important
I see that sometimes you have 2 or more versions uploaded so I see you ARE
working hard on the soft
I didn´t wanna hurry you up .. it is a hobby
always so excuse me PLEASE!!
Dg9bfc
Sigi
By the way jose
did you think about a different
Anyone have a link to the old LPDA DOS software? I found a couple of on-line
calculators but they do not seem to allow for custom designs as much as the
olf DOS application did.
23 matches
Mail list logo
