Hi Andy
Are you allowed to use a proprietary mode on the HAM band in US? In
Norway we are not.
la5vna Steinar
On 11.05.2010 03:18, Andy obrien wrote:
FYI, I plan to file a comment opposing the PIII on 60M proposal. My
objections are
PIII is a proprietary mode .
PIII as used in non-busy
-- Forwarded message --
From: paul_g0uzp g0uzp...@googlemail.com
Date: Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:25 AM
Subject: [30MDG] Help NEEDED with a Signallink USB
To: 30...@yahoogroups.com
Hi all,
A ham friend of mine (M0UTD) has bought a signalink USB interface. Tried to
install it. It
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:15 PM, aa6yq aa...@ambersoft.com wrote:
Where does one file comments on this proposal?
I sure wish the WinLink guys would backfit the WinMor busy frequency detector
and deploy it to every PMBO. I'd much rather write code than letters to the
FCC...
73,
Dave,
The discussion regarding Pactor III has relevance to earlier discussions on
this list concerning a new mode.
Whether you like Pactor III or not it's clear the FCC permits US amateurs to
use it and they regard the level of documention available on it to be adequate.
I suspect the only concern
The FCC Electronic Comment Filing System is at
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/
This loks like the one
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/proceeding/view?z=zcrgtname=10-98
there's one comment already.
73 Trevor M5AKA
tir, 11 05 2010 kl. 04:50 -0400, skrev Andy obrien:
Hi all,
A ham friend of mine (M0UTD) has bought a signalink USB interface.
Tried to install it. It comes up with audio codecs ok... but does not
assign a comport. I have tried all I know, without success.
However it is picking it up
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 Time: 21:18:20
I will probably suggest that they authorize PS31, MFSK16 and Winmor
500 if they are going to get mode specific.
Andy K3UK
Andy
Does the FCC *really* have to specify all the permissible modes? Surely
all that's
Trevor, thanks for your answer.
Is it posible to monitor the content of a WINLINK transmission?
As fare as I know the WINLINK data is compressed. I have never been able to
monitor WINLINK with my SCS TNC.
la5vna Steinar
On 11.05.2010 10:56, Trevor . wrote:
The discussion regarding
Hi Steinar,
I've never used WINLINK and know little about it but I'd imagine they use a
standard and freely available compression algorithms. Perhaps someone else can
comment.
73 Trevor M5AKA
--- On Tue, 11/5/10, Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no wrote:
Is it posible to monitor the
The F6FBB BBS protocol is used.
73 - Skip KH6TY
Trevor . wrote:
Hi Steinar,
I've never used WINLINK and know little about it but I'd imagine they
use a standard and freely available compression algorithms. Perhaps
someone else can comment.
73 Trevor M5AKA
--- On Tue, 11/5/10,
You further reinforce my position; the amateur radio service is not going to
support long haul emcomm infrastructure.
It doesn't matter what color you paint it.
If the amout of wasted envy spent on lamenting P3 was devoted to promoting the
Amateur Radio Service; then it may have a chance of
You'll need to find someone that understands the Signalink to get it
going.I found some one after 2 years of trial and error.Now I'm having
a ball.K4YDI.
On 5/11/10, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: paul_g0uzp g0uzp...@googlemail.com
Date:
The Radio Amateurs on the International Space Station (ISS) will be
transmitting Slow Scan TV pictures on 145.800 MHz on Thursday and Friday May
13-14.
The transmissions will take place in Robot-36 mode on Thursday May 13 from
10:00 - 17:00 UTC and on Friday May 14 from 12:45 - 16:00 UTC.
At 06:27 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote:
Another question was whether Pactor III's bandwidth was really necessary for
live keyboard to keyboard QSOs. I guess that was an anti-Pactor III question,
but that one also never got answered.
Jim to answer that I really would have to say that
for keyboard
Anyone know of a source?
John, W0JAB
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:52:15AM -0500, John Becker, WJAB wrote:
Anyone know of a source?
It would help to hear more about the application, John.
I suspect you want a USB-Serial converter, rather than just a patch
cable. There are dozens of the out there, some working better than
others. The
AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of David Little
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 8:35 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Opposing 60M proposal
You further
Just a cable.
232 in and out. BD9 on one end USB on the other
Sorry for any confusion.
At 11:42 AM 5/11/2010, you wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:52:15AM -0500, John Becker, WJAB wrote:
Anyone know of a source?
It would help to hear more about the application, John.
I suspect you want a
Any computer shop will have it for a few bucks
Dg9bfc
Sigi
232 on one end and usb on the other??? No source cause it is not a NORMAL
cable
What pins on the 232 should go on what pins of the usb connector???
You know 232 is 9 pin and usb is only 4 ?!?!?
Dg9bfc
Sigi
John, I asked you the same question, but you did not answer mine. :-(
Just as I thought, the only reason to allow Pactor-III on 60m is for
Winlink's benefit. Let's file comments to the FCC to allow any modes 500
Hz wide or less so at least 4 or 5 stations can use the channel for QSO
and
Some USB/serial converters don't work with all programs. Probably something to
do with the USB drivers. The best one I have was purchased from
www.buxcomm.com -- it works with all the various digital mode programs I use,
plus programmers for my HTs etc. It is US $15.
Sorry to both of you.
In the last week my mind has been elsewhere after my check up with
my cancer doctor. Really need testing to be sure but right now he
thinks that it may have return. But to answer both. No it is not needed.
And if I may add that I only use it when connected to a BBS. Makes
John W0JAB wrote: I Have only been a (ham) since 1968 and still learning. But
I don't recall all of this happening 10 or more years ago.
I got into amateur radio in 1959, and there were fairly strong disagreements
between AMers and SSBers.
In recent years, there have been disagreements
I wish the operating times were a little wider. I'm disappointed to realize
that it won't even be making a pass over my QTH while they are operating
SSTV. :(
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Trevor . m5...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The Radio Amateurs on the International Space Station (ISS) will be
Radio Shack.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@... wrote:
Anyone know of a source?
John, W0JAB
The SignaLink USB is not a rig control device, it's only an audio device. It
has a built in VOX circuit to do the keying.
Rig control must be done with a separate device.
If you got the audio to show up, you are there.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
27 matches
Mail list logo
