[digitalradio] Re: List of WINMOR-WINLINK HF servers

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
and a list via order of frequency K7EK-5 3569.5 KB1OOQ-53570.7 W7BO-5 3571.5 WB9FHP-53576.5 K3UK-5 3584.5 W5SEG-5 3584.5 KB5OZE-53586.5 A5UHR-5 3598.9 VK2JN-5 3631.5 PD4U-5 7045.5 VK2HL-5 7049 WB9FHP- 7076.5 AE6LA-5 7077.5 K7EK-5 7081.1 W1EO-5

[digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor [1 Attachment]

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
Skip (and anyone else interested), see the attached screenshot showing the Winmor server busy detect Andy K3UK

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
I agree Skip and have been studying the unattended sub-bands for suitable frequencies. Andy On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote: Thanks, Andy. Unless it is not impossible to disable busy detect, to answer your previous question about where to operate with

[digitalradio] Re: Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread obrienaj
Anyone have a reliable link to the FCC required band plan for unattended modes? I have the IARU Region II bandplan but just remembered that it differs, I think, from the FCC. Andy K3UK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote: I agree Skip and have been studying

[digitalradio] Automatic sub band frequencies

2010-06-27 Thread David Struebel
Andy, If you are looking at frequencies for your Winmor operation in the auto control subbands I can suggest some frequencies to avoid since they are the primary NTS Digital operating frequencies..with Pactor 1, 2, and 3. NTS Digital for the most part only operates in the auto control subbands

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread charles standlee
Andy, 97.221 is what you're looking for, The ARRL website has part 97 listed there.  73, Chuck AC5PW From: obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sun, June 27, 2010 8:40:48 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Busy detect screenshot for

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
I disagree. Being able to operate outside the automatic sub-bands is an incentive for operators to preferentially choose servers that include an effective automatic busy frequency detector and to keep that busy frequency detector enabled. We're in a deep hole dug by those who ran (and continue to

[digitalradio] Winmor throughput

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
Just a reminder..when Winmor first stated, the idea was to establish a mode that did not need a $1000 modem, and could at least achieve Pactor 2 speeds. While it still can be a finicky mode, it appears to be able to do what was first desired. I just picked up three pieces of mail for me AND

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
I can't disagree with your points Dave. However, until I have more experience with the busy detect from the server end, I think I'll feel more comfortable in the auto-sub band...at least for now.. Then , if I do transmit on a busy frequency despite the busy-detect, I'll feel less guilty. Despite

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
At 12:52 PM 6/27/2010, you wrote: This has generated enormous frustration over the years, to the point where some operators now intentionally QRM such servers. This intentional QRM is as disgusting as running a server without a busy frequency detector, and provides a convenient excuse for

Re: [digitalradio] Winmor throughput

2010-06-27 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Well Andy, I have that $1K modem. but in order to run WINMOR I would have to putout for a new faster computer. So what better? hen in hand or the one in the bush? At 12:56 PM 6/27/2010, you wrote: Just a reminder..when Winmor first stated, the idea was to establish a mode that did not need a

[digitalradio] Re: QRM maker on 14.078 CF

2010-06-27 Thread Juergen
I have just started trying to convince him to move. Please be patient for one or more days to allow a reaction. 73 Juergen, DL8LE --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jon_g4fut jon_g4...@... wrote: He is wiping out the weak JT8 and JT65 signals. Is there no way to contact him? --- In

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:07 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor Dave, I realize you

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
+++ More AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor Its my

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
Skip et al, Settling on  a sensible list of frequencies will take some studying FYI..  Here is a list of specific frequencies used by Winlink HF stations, May 2010 list.  Many have multiple stations using the particular frequency.  The list is world-wide. 3565 3569 3580 3583.5 3587.2 3589 3590