Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR Server Busy Detect- report

2010-07-06 Thread Andy obrien
No one answered his CQ. The transmitting Winmor stations were in Europe, so perhaps they did not hear the CW station. Andy K3UK On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:16 AM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote: Andy, any idea why the Winmor station transmited on an already busy frequency? Because it did not

Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR Server Busy Detect- report

2010-07-06 Thread Andy obrien
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:16 AM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote: Andy, any idea why the Winmor station transmited on an already busy frequency? Because it did not copy N0OE? Busy detector disabled? Your side worked - why did the other side not work? Did anyone answer N0OE's CQ? 73, Skip KH6TY

Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR Server Busy Detect- report

2010-07-06 Thread Mike Liller
I have a Yeasu 757 GX sitting around and I was thinking about setting up a fixed freq Winmor server.  My question is the TX/RX switching times.  I know the 757 GX is to slow for Pactor III but I have no idea about Winmor speed requirements.  I have used RMS Express a few times with my 706MKIIG

Re: [digitalradio] 13 Colonies

2010-07-06 Thread Mike Liller
Dave, It was nice to see a lot of PSK31 activity during Field Day as well, but one thing I noticed was it seemed that many of the ops were running AFC and they were moving off of the QSO because so many sigs we so close togeather on the WF.  Did you see the same Thing?  BTW, we W3YMW, my club

Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR Server Busy Detect- report

2010-07-06 Thread Andy obrien
I think it would be fine. Andy K3UK On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Mike Liller n7...@yahoo.com wrote: I have a Yeasu 757 GX sitting around and I was thinking about setting up a fixed freq Winmor server. My question is the TX/RX switching times. I know the 757 GX is to slow for Pactor

Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR Server Busy Detect- report

2010-07-06 Thread Andy obrien
Does Winmor keep any log of activity? 73, Skip KH6TY It logs each connect plus other activity example 2010/07/06 00:00:04 RMS WINMOR ID sent on frequency: 7104.50 KHz 2010/07/06 03:23:38 RMS WINMOR -Western New York Gateway (FN02HK) 2010/07/06 03:23:39 108 Minutes remaining 2010/07/06

[digitalradio] Re:WINMOR Server Busy Detect- report

2010-07-06 Thread Rick Muething
Andy, Skip, Andy that appears to be a good test and (assuming the N0 station was hidden from the calling European RMS Express station) an indication the busy detector does work to block the connect and help address the hidden transmitter problem often referenced. Some facts for Skip and

[digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters

2010-07-06 Thread pd4u_dares
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@... wrote: If you download and installed the newest version you will find the qrg in the software Three (3!!!) calling frequencies on 20m for a 2250Hz wide mode... and if you ask why, you get excluded from their

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters

2010-07-06 Thread Steinar Aanesland
It is a shame . There is only one thing to do -take back these frequencies by running other modes when they are free 73 de la5vna Steinar On 06.07.2010 18:08, pd4u_dares wrote: --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@... wrote: If you download and

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters

2010-07-06 Thread rein0zn
Greetings All, It still is a big question for me how an author of a, being it nice, program, not licensed radio amateur, can assign frequencies. I wished somebody could explain that to me and why it is that there is no real reaction or questioning of this action by the amateur community as

[digitalradio] Hamspots site and ROS

2010-07-06 Thread Rein A
Hi All, Most of us might have noticed the disappearance of the ROS section at the Australian ham spots list. http://hamspots.net/ ros/ I just noticed at least one reaction: A wrote: Hi All, Can anyone explaine why the HamSpots web page for ROS, now states:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters

2010-07-06 Thread W6IDS
WHO/WHAT is claiming 14.103 - 14.115? The author? The Hams who seem to be intrigued with ROS? If there's an apparent acceptance of the claimed freq spread, then it's not the author only who's in need of a good trouncing. UH OH.now I've done it. Bet I won't ever get on their forum, much

AW: [digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters

2010-07-06 Thread Siegfried Jackstien
As most dx is done on 20m and to give more hams a chance for a qso jose made 3 qrg on 20m . and he changed them SEVERAL TIMES after there were some other telling there is a pactor qrg or this is a packet qrg etc. .. he asked several times about qrg so I do not see where you have a problem . yes it

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters

2010-07-06 Thread phil g
The 14.105 packet group has been there a long time, but all I ever hear there now is splatter from ROS. If jose were a ham and had a better understanding of the gentlemen's agreement on bandplans, a lot of his inconvenience of having to reassign frequencies could have been avoided. Oops, off

[digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102

2010-07-06 Thread Russell Blair
VK3XQ on 17m calling CQ jt65-hf Russ NC5O  1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door! 2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. - Gerald Ford IN GOD WE TRUST Russell Blair (NC5O)

Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102

2010-07-06 Thread Rudy Benner
Listening From: Russell Blair Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:30 PM To: Digital Radio Subject: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102 VK3XQ on 17m calling CQ jt65-hf Russ NC5O 1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door! 2- A government big enough to give you

Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102

2010-07-06 Thread Russell Blair
Rudy, worked him agn for the 2nd time, yesterday as well, its a short window, been on 17m all day calling CQ and not much going on. No EU a XE at times and a few US and then the VK shows up. Russ NC5O  1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door! 2- A government

Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102

2010-07-06 Thread Rudy Benner
My response to that would not be deemed polite in any company. From: Russell Blair Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:53 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] jt65-hf 18102 Rudy, worked him agn for the 2nd time, yesterday as well, its a short window, been on 17m