g4ilo writes:
But why are you all so worked up over this? It is the USA not
Soviet Russia, you aren't going to end up in Siberia are you?
The late J Edgar Hoover, director of the FBI, used to exile FBI agents
he disliked to Alaska, which was as close to Siberia as he could send
them.
James French writes:
Can it be 'justified' to 'clog up' a new band with allowing ANY digital
mode,
and I am also including digitized voice into this, just to have it be there?
Why not use what is already staged and developed and on the bands that
already
have the allocations?
The
Rick Ellison writes:
...
This just makes no sense to me why you would push Pactor III on a
channelized frequency setting..
A good question: I was thinking of sending in a comment on that NPRM,
recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
that the FCC instead permit
Adding to Skip's remarks, I will point out it is considered almost an
indecency among the daily-position-report hams to mention 97.113(a)(5)
of the FCC rules, which states:
(a) No amateur station shall transmit:
...
(5) Communications, on a regular basis, which could reasonably be
Ed G writes:
Using your same logic below, it could well be determined that hams
who partake regularly in 75M evening nets, or even regular QSO, etc,
should take their conversations to FCC Part D Citizen's band, or other
service , because those communications on a regular
that applies to MSIE.
Sometimes convenience and safety are conflicting values.
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW), Chris Jewell
I didn't complain either, but after about 5 or so of his messages I
added this to my .procmailrc:
# advertisements in various Y! ham-radio mailing lists
*From: .*wb9...@yahoo.com
/dev/null
73 de kw6h, ex-ae6vw
Chris Jewell
forwarding service, which passes my firewall.
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW), Chris Jewell
Oops! That .procmailrc rule should read ...
:0 :
*Received: from .*72\.20\.12[14]\.[0-9]+
/dev/null
Sorry about the missing period.
--
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW), Chris Jewell
detection for bots should is mandatory|is infeasible, etc, but I'm
not sure I'm not confabulating here. :-)
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW)
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] PO Box 1396 Gualala CA USA 95445
, but it's not. We need regulation by bandwidth only,
but that proposal seems to be stalled. :-(
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ex-ae6vw) Gualala CA USA 95445
chars/sec) / (6 chars/word) = 20 words / second (not per minute)
20 x 60 = 1200 words/minute.
Besides, while I don't know a lot about AX.25, I'm pretty sure that
X.25, from which AX.25 is derived, is synchronous (no start or stop
bits).
--
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW) Chris JewellGualala CA USA
, Chris Jewell Gualala CA USA
other as needed.
--
73 de kw6h, ex-ae6vwChris Jewell, Gualala CA USA
expeditionradio writes:
Wow. It appears that the FCC has actually redefined Data below 30MHz
at less than 500Hz... data in the common way that 99% of hams send
data using digital modes on computers and ham transceivers.
I've often said that the antiquated content-based FCC rules have
reading.
73 de KW6H, ex AE6VW
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gualala CA USA 95445
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol
://www.sourcetext.com/grammarian/newslettersv09/9.6.htm.
It makes no mention of ham radio, but if you read it, you'll see why I
thought of it in this context.
-- 73 DE KW6H, ex AE6VW Chris Jewell
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector
this and has better suggestions, by all means offer
them. I'm an old computer geek but a new ham: I'm happy to learn
about either computers or radio from anyone who can improve my
understanding.
--
73 DE AE6VW Chris Jewell[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gualala CA USA 95445
Need a Digital mode QSO
time as it does now. That means either a much longer data
packet, or a pipelined group of packets covered by a single ACK. The
longer the packet, the greater chance that a static crash or other
event will corrupt the packet, so we're back to talking about
pipelined packets.
--
73 DE AE6VW Chris
it will prove fit for ham use. Obviously,
the people working on it think it is, and they know much more about it
than I, so I'm hopeful.
--
73 DE AE6VW Chris JewellGualala, CA, USA
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW
.
73 DE AE6VW, Chris
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion
kd4e writes:
Hmmm. Sounds as though if I wish to cover all modes I
will need something more than a sound card as some of
them need more interface help than others!
Perhaps not, since you're a Linux user. Although I haven't tried it
myself yet, I *think* you'll find that hfterm on Linux
. In such a context, a timebomb
is certainly an unnecessary feature. Software development decisions
that are acceptable for games or business software can get people
killed when used in programs critical to human life.
73 DE AE6VW, ex-KG6YLS
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] PO Box 1396 Gualala CA 95445
23 matches
Mail list logo
