--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien andrewob...@... wrote:
The replies to Ralph's question about audio levels appear to be sound advice
and certainly in keeping with what has been advised since sound card digital
modes burst upon the scene. I wonder how accurate it is though?
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Vojtech Bubnik bubn...@... wrote:
Hi Ralph.
The second or multiple received streams may be caused by a non-linearity
somewhere between his computer and your computer. It may be his sound card,
his TX, your RX or your sound card. Yes, I experienced it
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
I am probably more of an observer than most. I would like to be able to
monitor activity on all bands all the time. For less than $20 per band, a
softrock receiver kit can be purchased that monitors up to 96 KHz of
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker f6...@... wrote:
Hello Ed and all,
For information, with the last version of Multipsk (4.14), you can decode 48
KHz (for standard sound cards) up to 192 KHz (with specific sound cards) if
you have a SdR.
Note: with standard sound
Andy,
I have started to become acquainted with the DX Labs suite recently since I
switched to the DX Keeper logging program. On your recommendation I have
installed the entire DX Labs suite and I agree it does have a very wide range
of features. The DXView, Pathfinder, PropView and
It looks like the thread on MixW has run the course but I wanted to make a few
comments about what I felt were the best features of each of the programs that
I have used.
I started with Digipan and stayed with it for over 5 years because it was
simple to setup and use. The capability to
Andy,
I also have a TS-2000. Are you using the Packet filter menu, 50A? This can
set the bandwidth down to about 100Hz. The DSP on the TS-2000 is not the best
but I find it quite effective most of the time. It does produce a lot of ghost
signals and aliases. The 12-bit DSP probably limits
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker f6...@... wrote:
Hello Ed,
Nice report.
the beginning and increased towards the end until the connection was lost.
After one minute without possibility to acknowledge a frame, the ionospheric
conditions are supposed to be very bad
Tony,
Sorry I didn't have time to stop and chat. I copied your QSO with John, VE5MU,
from beginning to end while I was eating dinner and reading the mail. You were
strong at the beginning but John was stronger at the end. The repeat rate was
around 2:1 at the beginning and increased towards
Dennis,
I am not familiar with the Rascal with CW cables but it sounds like the
CW cable is plugged into the paddle jack instead of the straight key
jack.
I use a Rascal for digital modes with the TS-2000. But for CW I use a
separate com port with a homebrew interface (transistor, resistor
Kevin,
An article was posted on eham.net last year that my interest you.
http://www.eham.net/articles/14023
This describes a simple interface using a small USB hub, a USB sound
card and a USB to serial converter. This could probably be
disassembled and repackaged into one small box.
Ed
Rud,
I would really enjoy hearing some discussion on the use of OFDM on
HF. I work on an OFDM project and have an understanding of how it
works although I am not a system designer. I have also tried OFDM
with HamPal (digital SSTV) and WinDRM (digital voice) and it seems to
me that it offers
Andy,
Nice work on the document. I am just a few days behind you on the
learning curve. I was able to get it set up and running with the
documentation provided with the software but a few things had to be
learned by experience and experimentation. Your document has all
the essential
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ed,
You can find much more info on set up of PCALE, and general ALE
operation on the HFLINK group.
http://hflink.com
73 Bonnie KQ6XA
Thanks again, Bonnie. I just submitted a request to join the hflink
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed WB6YTE wrote:
I installed and attempted to setup PCALE yesterday but
encountered a few problems.
I did not find my radio (TS-2000) in the MIL-STD-188-141 menu.
Is this program limited to the radios
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A lot of ALE action today, 20M (14109) has been quite active with
netcalls and soundings. For example , I just decoded K5SKH with
fair signals
[13:49:40][FRQ 14109500][SND][ ][TIS][K5SKH ][AL0] BER 30 SN 10
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A lot of ALE action today, 20M (14109) has been quite active with
netcalls and soundings. For example , I just decoded K5SKH with
fair signals
[13:49:40][FRQ 14109500][SND][ ][TIS][K5SKH ][AL0] BER 30 SN 10
will continue to study the issue and report any
interesting ideas that show promise for weak signal digitzed voice
communications.
Ed
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Ed Hekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony DXDX@ wrote:
Ed wrote:
Are there any
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jhaynesatalumni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony DXDX@ wrote:
Jim
You need to mute the MIC audio on your sound card. That will stop
the WinDRM
digital signal from making it to your PC speakers and mixing
with
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ AETC
CONS/LGCA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard DV using LCP-10 and a 16 tone modem as well as a 39
tone modem at 1200 bps...it sounds robotic at best. But that could
have been just the systems used (ANDVT/Mil-STD-188-110)
Walt/K5YFW
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Ed Hekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found the specifications. The spec used for broadcast DRM can
be
found here:
http://webapp.etsi.org/exchangefolder/es_201980v020101p.pdf
The WinDRM spec can be found here:
http://www.qslnet.de/member/hb9tlk
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed wrote:
Are there any communications engineers in this group that can
give us some idea whether a useable quality digitized voice can
be
sent over a 2.5 KHz wide HF channel with SNR comparable to or
less than
what
I found the specifications. The spec used for broadcast DRM can be
found here:
http://webapp.etsi.org/exchangefolder/es_201980v020101p.pdf
The WinDRM spec can be found here:
http://www.qslnet.de/member/hb9tlk/drm_h.html
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have been QRV on digital voice ,using WinDRM, and thought I
would offer
some rookie/newbie random thoughts.
1. This mode's performance may appear counter-intuitive for most
digital
mode operators. By that
Andy,
I am monitoring but with an S9 noise level here this evening it is
very unlikely I will here anything out of town.
Ed
WB6YTE
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am on 7296 LSB calling CQ for the next hour between 0300 and 0400
UTC,
mostly
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am interested in trying my first digital voice QSO, using WINDRM,
anyone
want to also try it tonight ?
I just discovered WinDRM tonight and would like to try it but I don't
get home until after 7PM PDST. I will
Andy,
I didn't hear any signals last night either. After I wrote that
post I realized that EchoLink uses one of the sound cards required
for WinDRM. It will take a few minutes to set up another USB sound
card for EchoLink tonight.
How is the evening propagation on 40M? If we don't connect
Andy,
14233 is used for HamPal DRM pictures. I have copied several
pictures there over the past few weeks but the success rate of
HamPal without using the BSR is very low. I am looking forward to
trying WinDRM for voice - haven't heard anything on 40M yet.
Ed
--- In
28 matches
Mail list logo
