We are seeking to establish a standard for a digital network style system to
handle emergency communications.
We have established certain standards we are looking to follow.
The mode/protocol/package etc. should be based on weak signal HF capability.
The mode/protocol/package should be able to
@yahoogroups.com, Simon \(HB9DRV\) simon.br...@... wrote:
John,
Who's 'we' in this context? Why not join one of the existing teams - NBEMS
is working well.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: John Taylor ke5h...@...
Before the flames start
John Taylor wrote:
We are seeking to establish a standard for a digital network style
system to handle emergency communications.
We have established certain standards we are looking to follow.
The mode/protocol/package etc. should be based on weak signal HF
capability
, just
trying to determine which wheel will best suit our purpose.
Thanks again,
John
KE5HAM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon \(HB9DRV\) simon.br...@... wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Taylor ke5h...@...
... it does involve official emergency communications
Francis, have you tried posting this same question in the
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/softrock40/ group? They specialize in this device
and even have instruction files on all the softrock boards in the files section.
John - KE5HAM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, francisho...@...
At the risk of stirring an unwanted debate, I for one DO consider
repeated join requests as SPAM. Why? Mark has repeatedly joined
other related groups and immediately started gathering names from
that group to solicit memberships in his group. I do know, from
personal experience, that there have
Andy, this sounds more like the power connection between the power
supply and the motherboard is loose. Each of the devices you mention
gets power through a separate cable and can mechanically operate
regardless of the motherboard status. If the motherboard is not
getting power, the onboard video
Ron, as a semi direct answer to your question, as a general rule
cable tv frequencies typically are well above hf radio. It is not
impossible for there to be interference, but generally it will be
some other source. One thing to remember with most cable systems is
that the line and trunk amps
I can't hear it here, but your description sounds a lot like JT65 ...
a mode used a lot for EME.
JT - KE5HAM
Texas
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, lmeeny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Around 17.075 MHz I've heard a mode I can't identify. It appears to
have an 8 tone coding scheme
Oh sorry, forgot to mention it could also be PROPNET signals ...
JT - KE5HAM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, lmeeny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Around 17.075 MHz I've heard a mode I can't identify. It appears to
have an 8 tone coding scheme and is about 150 Hz wide. By ear there
Thanks for posting this BS Andy
This guy Rich is NOT telling the WHOLE truth about his? invention ..
I am getting bombarded with new requests to add me as a friend from
sources outside of Yahoo groups. This garbage is being circulated all
over the place and somebody, somewhere IS
By chance is the HP 1.6 gHz compter a laptop? If so, try unplugging
the power adapter while the noise is being generated or when it is
bothering your receiver. If that is not the problem, do you have an
external monitor running? If so, try turning off just the monitor
while you are seeing the
It was called a Chinese firedrake in another group and has been on
for a while.
Before you ask what a firedrake is see
http://www.satdirectory.com/firedrake.html
for one explanation
73
John
KE5HAM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I the only
Could be true Chuck. I guess to take it just a step further, we need
to ask Simon to start looking into writing another mode into his
great software to decode/operate the hammers to hit the trees like
the old natives in the jungle do.
Oops, somebody would have to go cut down trees and the
Thanks Andy, and to add to the Dead Band reports, W8LEW and myself
(KE5HAM) recently experimented on 30 meters trying to determine how
low we could go in power. We started out with about 50 watts and
managed to drop our power progressively to 1 watt on each end and
maintain 100% contacts -
15 matches
Mail list logo
