Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-28 Thread Andy obrien
Thanks Skip. primary mission is for regional access. So far that has turned out to be the case, stations within a few hundred miles. I'm also paying around with 10M ground wave to see what results are. 6M may also be tested. Andy K3UK On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:00 AM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net

[digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor [1 Attachment]

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
Skip (and anyone else interested), see the attached screenshot showing the Winmor server busy detect Andy K3UK

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
I agree Skip and have been studying the unattended sub-bands for suitable frequencies. Andy On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:24 AM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote: Thanks, Andy. Unless it is not impossible to disable busy detect, to answer your previous question about where to operate with

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
months ago that he would investigate 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 9:25 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
I can't disagree with your points Dave. However, until I have more experience with the busy detect from the server end, I think I'll feel more comfortable in the auto-sub band...at least for now.. Then , if I do transmit on a busy frequency despite the busy-detect, I'll feel less guilty. Despite

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
At 12:52 PM 6/27/2010, you wrote: This has generated enormous frustration over the years, to the point where some operators now intentionally QRM such servers. This intentional QRM is as disgusting as running a server without a busy frequency detector, and provides a convenient excuse for

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:07 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor Dave, I realize you

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Dave AA6YQ
+++ More AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor Its my

Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

2010-06-27 Thread Andy obrien
] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor Its my impression that the WinMOR busy frequency detector has been well-characterized as effective (going back to its original deployment in SCAMP), so its not clear to me why more evaluation is required.