On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:48:06 +0100, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
All,
Recent path simulation tests indicate that Nino Porcino's PSK63F offers
better performance over PSK31 and PSK63 in a couple of areas. The most
significant improvement is it's ability to endure Doppler spread found on
With Tony's permission, PSK63F data is added to the graphs at
http://mysite.verizon.net/wz7i/digitalmodes.html
Wes, WZ7I
www.wz7i.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F
Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31 under the same test scenarios?
Certainly, there would be more a in throughput, but that is a matter of some
liberal use of CW shorthand.
philw de
jumps over the lazy dog
the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: Phil Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F
Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31
- Original Message -
From: Phil Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F
Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31 under the same test scenarios?
Certainly, there would be more a in throughput
over the lazy dog
the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: Phil Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F
Very
The worst case and I see this once, transmission is not
possible in BPSK (or only at very high speeds as 125 bauds or more).
Why not bite the bullet and use PSK125R and pskmail client-to-client arq.
It adds an interleaver, is less susceptible to doppler effects
and adds full duplex arq at
All,
Recent path simulation tests indicate that Nino Porcino's PSK63F offers
better performance over PSK31 and PSK63 in a couple of areas. The most
significant improvement is it's ability to endure Doppler spread found on
paths that cross the polar ionosphere. Both PSK31 and PSK63 fail
Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31 under the same test scenarios?
Certainly, there would be more a in throughput, but that is a matter of
some liberal use of CW shorthand.
philw de ka1gmn
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
All,
Recent path simulation tests
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:48 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F
All,
Recent path simulation tests indicate that Nino Porcino's PSK63F offers
better performance over PSK31 and PSK63 in a couple of areas. The most
significant improvement is it's ability to endure Doppler spread
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:14 AM, W6IDS w6...@verizon.net wrote:
PSK63F is within the STREAM download? I saw references to it in
the reference documentation, but it's unclear to me if it is actually in
the application you download.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN EM79
Yep, it is there under
: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F
Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31 under the same test scenarios?
Certainly, there would be more a in throughput, but that is a matter of some
liberal use of CW shorthand.
philw de ka1gmn
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote
-
*From:* Phil Williams ka1...@gmail.com
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Monday, January 04, 2010 11:16 AM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] IZ8BLY's PSK63F
Very interesting. What about PSKFEC31 under the same test scenarios?
Certainly, there would be more a in throughput
13 matches
Mail list logo
