Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team

2007-12-28 Thread Patrick Lindecker
: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team Patrick, Also look at the WSJT group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wsjtgroup/ - Joe also has an inactive developer group. It would appear that much less than 1% of digital mode users actively develop software, I know many excellent software guys who are also

[digitalradio] JT65 - work in team

2007-12-27 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello to all, I would be interested to study JT65 and, perhaps, add this mode to Multipsk (let's say before the end of 2008 or the beginning of 2009). The JT65 specifications are too much general and don't permit to build a code from them. I saw that the sources (Fortran and C or C++?) of JT65

Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team

2007-12-27 Thread Simon Brown
No only am I interested, I am ahead of you - I hope to have this working with a C++ engine under Windows by about the end of March 2008. Originally I was targeting end of 2007 but decided to add SSTV support before finishing WSJT. The WSJT code is Fortran, Python and C (I think) which is very

Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team

2007-12-27 Thread Patrick Lindecker
@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 2:50 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team No only am I interested, I am ahead of you - I hope to have this working with a C++ engine under Windows by about the end of March 2008. Originally I was targeting end of 2007 but decided to add

Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team

2007-12-27 Thread Simon Brown
Hi, That's it. Your first step is to follow Joe's instructions and compile this, then understand how to use it. I have written a lot of user interface but not yet attacked the decoding. Simon Brown, HB9DRV - Original Message - From: Patrick Lindecker * a file which name is

Re: [digitalradio] JT65 - work in team

2007-12-27 Thread Simon Brown
Patrick, Also look at the WSJT group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wsjtgroup/ - Joe also has an inactive developer group. It would appear that much less than 1% of digital mode users actively develop software, I know many excellent software guys who are also Hams but they just don't have the