[digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US system and the European system on terrestrial JT65A contacts. Can anyone explain to me when a contact is 'valid' between two stations using the two different systems please? For example, I received the following today

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That was it, no report, not even OOOs. I was using what, in the guide, says is the European standard of sending the received dB signal strength, but the EA station was using the US version, appart from no OOO. Sorry, my mistake, I missread the guide. Seems that

RE: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread Barry Garratt
/W7 _ From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:24 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] JT65A reports There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US system

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread Len Morris VE3FJB
Hey Barry, Happy New Year.. Where are you camped out now? Not much new here, still sticking in TXs and stuff like that with Paul PQ... Will be in AZ next month I think.. Len

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread David
:* [digitalradio] JT65A reports There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US system and the European system on terrestrial JT65A contacts. Can anyone explain to me when a contact is 'valid' between two stations using the two different systems please? For example, I received

RE: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread Barry Garratt
] On Behalf Of David Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 1:10 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports Barry Garratt wrote: Hi Dave, Actually what you describe is EME reports as opposed to Terrestrial reports. The OOO and RO are used for EME but are also