[digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread Lester Veenstra
This, as we say in the lightning fast chicken navy, the following is simply “BS” : ‘ Anyone with DigiPan or any other PSK31 program with a waterfall can verify that the frequency spreading is random and not a function of the data, which is the signature of spread-spectrum.’ The use of a

Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread KH6TY
Lester, I really appreciate your mannerly characterization of what I wrote as BS. :-( From the Wikipedia, a more exact definition of spread spectrum is, *Frequency-hopping spread spectrum* (*FHSS*) is a method of transmitting radio signals by rapidly switching a carrier /wiki/Carrier_wave

RE: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread Lester Veenstra
: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:17 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum Lester, I really appreciate your mannerly characterization of what I wrote as BS

Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread KH6TY
Lester, The inventor has shown over and over that he is not to be trusted, and so his block diagram would not be believed either. I suggested months ago to him to just send his code in confidence to the FCC, which they would keep private, and be done with it. He replied that, arrogantly, The

RE: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread Greg DeChant
] Random data vs Spread Spectrum Lester, The inventor has shown over and over that he is not to be trusted, and so his block diagram would not be believed either. I suggested months ago to him to just send his code in confidence to the FCC, which they would keep private, and be done

Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread W2XJ
Why do you persist in getting the FCC involved? You are potentially damaging the hobby as a whole. If one is qualified to hold a license the FCC presumes ones ability to determine what operations are legal. On 7/12/10 1:28 PM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote: Lester, The

Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread rein0zn
are wrong and you violated section this and that? even I were to ask, why please and they say, we told you it was illegal! 73 Rein W6SZ -Original Message- From: W2XJ w...@w2xj.net Sent: Jul 12, 2010 5:52 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread

Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread KH6TY
It was not my idea. The author wanted the FCC to say it was not spread spectrum. Unfortunately for all of us in the US, it is spread spectrum, and the FCC rules do not allow that below 222 MHz. I am not potentially damaging the hobby as a whole, just posting what I know. Go ahead and use

RE: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

2010-07-12 Thread Lester Veenstra
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:33 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum Hi W2XJ, Could you tell me please ( I am believe to be the only person