--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker f6...@... wrote:
Hello,
Once an effective, simple and robust SELCAL standard is developed (again
IMHO it should be a logical extension of the existing RSID and Call ID
standards) it could eventually be parlayed into a more modern
- Original Message -
From: aa777888athotmaildotcom aa777...@hotmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 12:51 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Getting serious about ALE for non-encomm digital
hamming
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker f6
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:18 PM, aa777888athotmaildotcom
aa777...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've gave PCALE a very good try. As implemented it suffers from several
problems:
1. It is equipment specific and intensive. You either need an SGC tuner set
up for bypass-on-receive (the only brand I
This is not really correct with PC-ALE and a modern receiver that has
a internal antenna tuner. I have used PC-ALE with a TS2000 and an
Icom 746 Pro and the tuner in both rigs memorizes settings for each
transmission
How fast does the rig need to scan?
philw de ka1gmn
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:18 PM, aa777888athotmaildotcom
aa777...@... wrote:
I've gave PCALE a very good try. As implemented it suffers from several
problems:
1. It is equipment specific and intensive. You
...@hotmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 4:18 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Getting serious about ALE for non-encomm digital
hamming
I've gave PCALE a very good try. As implemented it suffers from several
problems:
1. It is equipment specific and intensive. You
I've gave PCALE a very good try. As implemented it suffers from several
problems:
1. It is equipment specific and intensive. You either need an SGC tuner set up
for bypass-on-receive (the only brand I am aware of that has this capability)
or a special antenna that is resonant and efficient on
