This is where a combination of Patrick's RSID idea (also in fldigi and DM780
5.0 and PocketDigi) and SDR will help.
On July 1st I want to start writing my own Windows SDR console, initially for
SoftRock and later other SDR radios. Instead of monitoring ~3kHz as at present
we'll be able to
Say, John, you also use Pactor 2 and 3 which are always 100 baud PSK
modes. Do you find that these modes work through the ionospheric
conditions when sound card modes, even those with similar modes do not?
I find PSK to be rather poor at times here at 44 degrees N latitude,
unless you are
Rick W escribió:
Say, John, you also use Pactor 2 and 3 which are always 100 baud PSK
modes.
Pactor and Pactor 2 can work at 200 baud. Buit it requires little
multipath and good SNR.
Do you find that these modes work through the ionospheric
conditions when sound card modes, even those
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
I'll agree with John, while many here will find ALE400 easy to
tackle, many average hams will be intimidated by an unfamiliar
process. That is why Skip Teller's concepts behind NBEMS are good,
using mode that many hams use
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: PSK-ARQ versus ALE-400
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
I'll agree with John, while many here will find ALE400 easy to
tackle, many average hams will be intimidated
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Bill McLaughlin
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:40 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: PSK-ARQ versus ALE-400
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
I'll agree with John, while many here
