John K8OCL wrote:
The ARRL HSMM Working Group recommended at least the same
bandwidth for HF digital research and advancement as the
current ARRL bandplan recommended for a old legacy mode
such as AM.
Hi John,
There is really no sensible reason that AM should get special
treatment in a
, October 15, 2006 10:50 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Wider Bandwidths and
Frequency Choices Needed in
Future
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http
At 10:05 PM 10/15/2006, you wrote:
I know some have asked for chunks that way, but at the same time for chunks
with larger signal bandwidth. What I am concerned about is some 3 kc signal
getting on top of us when we are using cw or psk or some other narrower
signal, and wiping us out. Already
: Wider Bandwidths and Frequency Choices Needed
in Future
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:12:04 -
John K8OCL wrote:
The ARRL HSMM Working Group recommended at least the same
bandwidth for HF digital research and advancement as the
current ARRL bandplan recommended for a old legacy mode
: [digitalradio] Re: Wider Bandwidths and Frequency Choices
Needed in Future
At 10:05 PM 10/15/2006, you wrote:
I know some have asked for chunks that way, but at the same time for
chunks
with larger signal bandwidth. What I am concerned about is some 3 kc
signal
getting on top of us when we
What can I say to please you?
But just like RTTY - PSK has no God given right
to that part of the band either. But like I said below
(in red this time). Seems you missed it before.
At 01:57 PM 10/16/2006, you wrote:
Last weekend, or was it the one
before, during a RTTY contest, I heard them
]
- Original Message -
From:
John Becker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 3:53
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Wider
Bandwidths and Frequency Choices Needed in Future
What can I say to please you?But just like RTTY - PSK has
, October 16, 2006 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Wider Bandwidths and Frequency Choices
Needed in Future
At 10:05 PM 10/15/2006, you wrote:
I know some have asked for chunks that way, but at the same time for
chunks
with larger signal bandwidth. What I am concerned about
Danny Douglas N7DC wrote:
But Bonnie, no one is asking that 500 HZ be the maximum in use.
Hi Danny,
Actually, many organisations are asking for limitations of 500Hz or
200Hz in large chunks of the bands.
See the recent proposal for rulemaking by ARRL, which is currently
being considered
: Wider Bandwidths and Frequency Choices Needed in
Future
Danny Douglas N7DC wrote:
But Bonnie, no one is asking that 500 HZ be the maximum in use.
Hi Danny,
Actually, many organisations are asking for limitations of 500Hz or
200Hz in large chunks of the bands.
See the recent proposal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Wider Bandwidths and Frequency Choices Needed
in Future
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:50:19 -
Danny Douglas N7DC wrote:
But Bonnie, no one is asking that 500 HZ be the maximum
11 matches
Mail list logo
