Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63)

2009-03-22 Thread Tony
Skip, MT63-1000 has a -5 dB minimum S/N, but MFSK16 has a -13.5 dB minimum S/N, so the static tests you made must be at signal levels high enough that MT63-1000 decodes, which may not be a realistic level. That is true. Fortunately, there are times when signals are above the decode threshold

Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63)

2009-03-22 Thread kh6ty
- From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 3:03 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63) Skip, MT63-1000 has a -5 dB minimum S/N, but MFSK16 has a -13.5 dB minimum S/N, so the static tests you made must be at signal

RE: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63)

2009-03-22 Thread David Little
, March 22, 2009 3:04 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63) Skip, MT63-1000 has a -5 dB minimum S/N, but MFSK16 has a -13.5 dB minimum S/N, so the static tests you made must be at signal levels high enough that MT63-1000 decodes

Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63)

2009-03-22 Thread Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 9:58 AM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63) I would like to remind all, if you are not already aware, to turn AGC off when static crashes are an issue. If you are fortunate enough to operate in a mixed mode net

Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63)

2009-03-21 Thread Jaak Hohensee
Tony wrote: The most impressive thing about MT63 is how it seems to resist heavy static crashes. I made a few recordings with short segments of the signal removed to simulate this type of QRN and there was little effect on copy. What about THOR? Thor stated to be more static-proof.

Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63)

2009-03-21 Thread Tony
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:55 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63) Tony wrote: The most impressive thing about MT63 is how it seems to resist heavy static crashes. I made a few recordings with short segments of the signal removed to simulate

Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63)

2009-03-21 Thread kh6ty
particular mission out of all the many available choices. 73, Skip KH6TY NBEMS Development Team - Original Message - From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 5:05 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63

Re: [digitalradio] THOR is static-proof (Re: KV9U - MT63)

2009-03-21 Thread kh6ty
Tony, Further complicating the static crash test conclusions is the effect of the static on the receiver AGC. If a long AGC constant is being used, the static crash is going to desensitize the receiver for as long as the AGC holds the receiver sensitivity above the decoding threshold. In such