RE: [digitalradio] I Apologize

2007-11-21 Thread Box SisteenHundred
for his exchange...and then tell him he's a 599 ! shakes his head 73 - Bill KA8VIT To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:31:19 -0600 Subject: Re: [digitalradio] I Apologize Sorry you feel that way Garrett. But it's been that way the 37 years

Re: [digitalradio] I Apologize

2007-11-20 Thread AA0OI
) Garrett / AA0OI - Original Message From: John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:19:59 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] I Apologize Long long time ago (1969) a friend (now SK) who help me become a ham told me that contest

Re: [digitalradio] I Apologize

2007-11-20 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Sorry you feel that way Garrett. But it's been that way the 37 years that I have been a ham. Since many do get on just to work the contest how about putting those that are not contesting in that 100kc ? The needs of the many outweight the needs of the few ! At 05:13 PM 11/20/2007, you wrote: Hi

Re: [digitalradio] I Apologize

2007-11-19 Thread AA0OI
Message From: Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:18:45 AM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] I Apologize I suppose if the pictures had to get through because of an emergency, the VFO could have been used as per Hollingsworth’s comments @ Dayton

Re: [digitalradio] I Apologize

2007-11-19 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Long long time ago (1969) a friend (now SK) who help me become a ham told me that contest weed out the weak. I for one love contest. Be it SSB CW or RTTY. It's a bit like what they say about TV. If you don't like what you are watching change the channel. Same holds true ham radio. All 6 of my

RE: [digitalradio] I Apologize

2007-11-18 Thread Barry Garratt
Which CQ Magazine contest are you referring to that runs for 3 days and was running yesterday morning? There was no contest shown on their website and usually their contests are 48 hours not 72. Just curious. Barry VE3CDX/W7 _ From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [digitalradio] I Apologize

2007-11-18 Thread Bill
I suppose if the pictures had to get through because of an emergency, the VFO could have been used as per Hollingsworth's comments @ Dayton. Maybe a secondary frequency should be selected for the net or a VFO procedure since none of us own a frequency no matter how long we may have been using it.