Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That was it, no report, not even OOOs. I was using what, in the guide, says is the European standard of sending the received dB signal strength, but the EA station was using the US version, appart from no OOO. Sorry, my mistake, I missread the guide. Seems that

RE: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread Barry Garratt
Hi Dave, Actually what you describe is EME reports as opposed to Terrestrial reports. The OOO and RO are used for EME but are also the defaults in so much as the JT65 modes were initially mainly used on EME. Either will constitute a good contact as long as RRR is exchanged. The 73 exchange is

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread Len Morris VE3FJB
Hey Barry, Happy New Year.. Where are you camped out now? Not much new here, still sticking in TXs and stuff like that with Paul PQ... Will be in AZ next month I think.. Len

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread David
Barry Garratt wrote: Hi Dave, Actually what you describe is EME reports as opposed to Terrestrial reports. The OOO and RO are used for EME but are also the defaults in so much as the JT65 modes were initially mainly used on EME. Either will constitute a good contact as long as RRR is

RE: [digitalradio] JT65A reports

2008-01-05 Thread Barry Garratt
] On Behalf Of David Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 1:10 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports Barry Garratt wrote: Hi Dave, Actually what you describe is EME reports as opposed to Terrestrial reports. The OOO and RO are used for EME but are also