New release (4.5) of MULTIPSK
RX/TX: PSK10/BPSK31-63-125/QPSK31-63-125/CHIP
(64/128)/PSKFEC31/PSKAM10-31-50/PSK63F - PSK220F + DIGISSTV
Run/DTMF/CW/CCW/CCW-FSK/THROB/THROBX/DTMF/MFSK8/
MFSK16 (+ SSTV)/MIL-STD-188-141A (+ARQ FAE)/ALE400/OLIVIA/CONTESTIA/RTTYM/
VOICE/DominoF DF/DominoEX/MT63/RTTY
Welcome to ve3lvv, DRCC # 1611.
Andy K3UK.
To the great group of Digital Pic Guys that we had on 7.178 on Sat.
I apologize for not being able to have a net this Sunday morning.
I apologize the the arrogant and rude hams that do contesting and don't
listen to a freq before transmitting, and do splits without
listening and move
Hi Vojtech,
Thank you for your reply to my papers. I will do more work on the phonemes.
The project I want to do uses new computers that were no available 10 years
ago. Every 10 mS a decision is made to send a one or a zero. To make that
decision I have 68 parallel FFT's running in the
OK, I give up. What is the slow MFSK I am seeing on 20 meters lately.
It idles at the lowest frequency an looks like there may be around
frequencies used?
Gary N0GW
OK, I give up. What is the slow MFSK I am seeing on 20 meters lately.
It idles at the lowest frequency an looks like there may be around 16
frequencies used?
Gary N0GW
Gary
If its around 14.076 then its JT65A.
You will find stations TX/RX in even/odd minute segments.
Google JT65A for the software package called WSJT by K1JT.
73
Paul
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, grwescom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I give up. What is the slow MFSK I am seeing
This is likely a mode developed for moonbounce/meteor scatter that some
have been using on HF to see another hams callsigns and signal report
with weak signals. JT-65A perhaps?
73,
Rick, KV9U
grwescom wrote:
OK, I give up. What is the slow MFSK I am seeing on 20 meters lately.
It idles
Cool!
Thanks Paul.
Gary
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, paul181696
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary
If its around 14.076 then its JT65A.
You will find stations TX/RX in even/odd minute segments.
Google JT65A for the software package called WSJT by K1JT.
73
Paul
Which CQ Magazine contest are you referring to that runs for 3 days and was
running yesterday morning?
There was no contest shown on their website and usually their contests are
48 hours not 72.
Just curious.
Barry VE3CDX/W7
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL
There are several (military/gov) standard intelligibility tests that
do a pretty good job of scoring what most humans can and can not
reliably understand. You might try taking a look at them to get some
ideas of which voice characteristics make the most difference to
intelligibility. There is
Robert,
I agree. The thing that is different is that speech recognition is not real
time. Voice over the radio is real time.
Mike n6ief
On Nov 18, 2007 10:46 AM, Robert Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are several (military/gov) standard intelligibility tests that
do a pretty
I suppose if the pictures had to get through because of an emergency, the
VFO could have been used as per Hollingsworth's comments @ Dayton. Maybe a
secondary frequency should be selected for the net or a VFO procedure since
none of us own a frequency no matter how long we may have been using it.
That is not entirely true. Besides, I wasn't focusing so much on their
real research as the voice characterization research that they had
to do before they could usefully work on recognition. It turns out
that the very areas that are most necessary for digital voice
recognition are the ones most
Oops, sent too quickly. What I meant was: That ( speech recognition
not being real time) is not entirely true. There are many commercial
packages that do minimal-lag realtime speech recognition. One
example would be the voice command features built into Apple's OSX.
Another would be any one of a
I have a problem, just looking for confirmation.
I think I have lost the Audio out of the Data Port on my TS480. Just to
confirm. I Plugged earphones into the spkr jack and the mon jack on the back
of the USB, No Sound, so I am pretty sure it has a problem. the xmt circuit
is working
Well, he has a very good point that perhaps you should consider.
Using more bandwidth than you need to communicate is worse than using too
much power.
73,
Charles Brabham, N5PVL
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
At 06:10 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
N3WT United States 14,073.1 PSK63
2007-18-11 18:19K3UK PSK63 36
K6MKF United States 14,073.7 PSK63
2007-18-11 18:26K3UK PSK63 34
K7RE United States
Mode, and signal strength.
On Nov 18, 2007 7:30 PM, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:10 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
N3WT United States 14,073.1 PSK63
2007-18-11 18:19K3UK PSK63 36
K6MKF United States
Yes, it is very gratifying to see it finally take off a little. Now, if we
can only convince the RTTY contest sponsers to specifically include and
mention PSK63, or hopefully even give it a multiplier to encourge folks to
try it...
What I noticed is that the turnover speed rivaled RTTY, with
At 07:10 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
Yes, it is very gratifying to see it finally take off a little. Now, if we
can only convince the RTTY contest sponsers to specifically include and
mention PSK63,
Skip with all due respect. why ?
It's not RTTY. Would this not be like adding CW to a side band
Because it does a better job than rtty (less fills) in less space. If
everyone used PSK63 instead of RTTY, there would not be so many complaints
by non-contesters about having so little space to use during contests. A
PSK63 stations signal, operated linearly, takes up only 1/5 the space of a
At 08:00 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
It is not like adding CW to a phone contest because both RTTY and PSK63 are
keyboard modes. Phone and CW are not.
Well just add the rest of the keyboard modes while your at it...
And please make sure you do add both the keyboard mode of Amtor
and Pactor.
I
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
Well just add the rest of the keyboard modes while your at it...
Great idea! With mode multipliers.
And
please make sure you do add both the keyboard mode of Amtor and
Pactor.
Ten extra points for using a time machine, because that is what you'll
need to work
Roger
regardless of what you think about Amtor and Pactor -
both are still doing very well. Other then a hand full of
CW and SSB QSO's the log book is full of both Amtor
and Pactor 1, 2 and 3.
John, W0JAB
At 08:16 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
Ten extra points for using
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Becker, WØJAB
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:11 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PSK63 activity!
At 08:00 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
It is not like adding
More akin to an AM contest of the 60s including SSB to encourage it.
RTTY is an older digital mode. It _should_ be replaced by the newer narrow
band mode just as SSB replaced AM, and for the same reasons. Equivalent
performance with improved RF usage, mainly bandwidth.
Rud Merriam K5RUD
ARES
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Becker, WØJAB
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:11 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PSK63
28 matches
Mail list logo
