AMSAT
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of kh6ty
Sent: 19 November 2007 04:00 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Howard Teller
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PSK63 activity!
Because it does a better job than rtty (less fills) in less space
Hi Andy.the only problem was that those of us that usually work WSJT
JT65A on 14076 found that we couldnt due to the PSK63 ops on that
freq.it was mainly EU stations that were the worst.it would be
nice if some ops thought of other users of the band
73 David VK4BDJ
Andrew
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
Roger regardless of what you think about Amtor and Pactor - both are
still doing very well. Other then a hand full of CW and SSB QSO's the
log book is full of both Amtor and Pactor 1, 2 and 3.
John, W0JAB
Incredible. And I am on digital almost every morning
I have tried PSK31 at Field Day and found it to be very poor for a
contesting mode. PSK63 is faster, but it is also even less sensitive
than PSK31. A while back, I tried PSK63 recently as a comparison to
PSK31 and it performed very poorly and we were forced to chose other
modes, e.g., MFSK16.
At 06:10 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
N3WT United States 14,073.1 PSK63
2007-18-11 18:19K3UK PSK63 36
K6MKF United States 14,073.7 PSK63
2007-18-11 18:26K3UK PSK63 34
K7RE United States
Mode, and signal strength.
On Nov 18, 2007 7:30 PM, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:10 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
N3WT United States 14,073.1 PSK63
2007-18-11 18:19K3UK PSK63 36
K6MKF United States
for helping launch PSK63!
73, Skip
KH6TY
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DIGITALRADIO digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 7:10 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] PSK63 activity!
I assume that Skip will be happy. His PSK63 efforts
At 07:10 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
Yes, it is very gratifying to see it finally take off a little. Now, if we
can only convince the RTTY contest sponsers to specifically include and
mention PSK63,
Skip with all due respect. why ?
It's not RTTY. Would this not be like adding CW to a side band
: John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PSK63 activity!
At 07:10 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
Yes, it is very gratifying to see it finally take off a little. Now, if we
can only convince the RTTY
At 08:00 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
It is not like adding CW to a phone contest because both RTTY and PSK63 are
keyboard modes. Phone and CW are not.
Well just add the rest of the keyboard modes while your at it...
And please make sure you do add both the keyboard mode of Amtor
and Pactor.
I
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
Well just add the rest of the keyboard modes while your at it...
Great idea! With mode multipliers.
And
please make sure you do add both the keyboard mode of Amtor and
Pactor.
Ten extra points for using a time machine, because that is what you'll
need to work
Roger
regardless of what you think about Amtor and Pactor -
both are still doing very well. Other then a hand full of
CW and SSB QSO's the log book is full of both Amtor
and Pactor 1, 2 and 3.
John, W0JAB
At 08:16 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
Ten extra points for using
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Becker, WØJAB
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:11 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PSK63 activity!
At 08:00 PM 11/18/2007, you wrote:
It is not like adding
AEC Montgomery County, TX
http://TheHamNetwork.net
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Becker, WØJAB
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 7:21 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PSK63 activity!
At 07
14 matches
Mail list logo
