[digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-16 Thread Danny Douglas
Thank you and very well said. Danny Douglas N7DC ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB All 2 years or more (except Novice) Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred, I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for those who do.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-15 Thread bruce mallon
MY POINT IS .. You ( DIGITAL USERS ) call CW ( ANALOG ) stone age .. You call those who enjoy SSB, AM, FM or just talking on the radio the reason ham radio is dieing . YOU ARE OUR SALVATION ! You by your digital modes will save the bands from the invading army of other users ...

[digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-15 Thread kh6ty
Flame on this idea if you wish, however robust live-chat sound-card modes, ARQ messaging modes, and Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) modes will all gain increased popularity, acceptance, and adoption because of their more efficient and reliable communication capabilities as compared to manual

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-15 Thread Roger J. Buffington
kh6ty wrote: 97.113 Prohibited transmissions. (a) No amateur station shall transmit: (5) Communications, on a regular basis, which could reasonably be furnished alternatively through other radio services. Excellent point. The above regulation, interpreted reasonably, would outlaw 99.9%

[digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-14 Thread jgorman01
First, let me say that these recommendations are based solely upon hopes and dreams. There are no facts or data with by which one can adequately assess the recommendations. If you want to convince someone that further segmentation of the rtty/data segments into smaller and smaller pieces is a

[digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-14 Thread jgorman01
But you're ignoring the aggregate effects. It's like showing your wife a hair off an elephant that is rampaging through your house and saying, no big deal, look it's just a little hair. Jim WA0LYK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 07:26 PM