TCP is reliable. UDP is unreliable.
Aside from sending data that can be safely dropped, such as sound
packets, there is no reason for aplication programs to use UDP.
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 5:07 am, Simon Brown wrote:
An advantage of UDP is that the logger could be on another platform /
Re UDP servers, we established the Amateur Radio Software
Development group a year ago to work out the details of this and
other shared mechanisms, but it died from lack of interest.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arswd/
Remember?
I'll stick with DDE interfaces for now; they aren't elegant,
I go between MultiPSK and DM780. What is the best/easiest way to
create a combined/common log?
Multipsk seemlessly logs to DX Keeper . DM780 easily exports to DX
Keeper.
BTW - I have a fine NTPClient class in C++ in case anyone is interested, I
use this when calibrating soundcards and also to keep my computer clock
updated every 15 minutes.
You would have to modify it yourself as it uses a few DM780 calls but the
intelligence you need is in place.
Simon
An advantage of UDP is that the logger could be on another platform /
computer. Although there's network DDE I have never tried it and don't want
to try it to be honest.
Also I would say that UDP is easy in all languages, DDE is a tad complex in
C++.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
- Original
to see that happen. The need never goes away!
Skip KH6TY
- Original Message -
From: Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 3:39 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Logging for MultiPSK and DM780
Re UDP servers, we established
