any suggestions then ie rigblasters ect??
MATTHEW A. GREGORY
KC2PUA
- Original Message
From: Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:32:48 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: signalink sL+
kh6ty skrev:
Skip
Bonnie and all,
I use the SignalLink SL-1+ (older version, not USB) for ARQ modes
successfully. I use MultiPSK and the ARQ modes I have tested and had
working are: ALE 141A, ALE400, Pax/Pax2 and Packet.
As there is no sound card Pactor (or AMTOR) ARQ there is no way to see
if it works but I
I agree completely with Sholto. As I mentioned previously, the
asynchronous ARQ modes don't have any problem with reasonable speed
switching time. In fact, this is one of the reasons for the move to
develop more ham friendly ARQ modes and away from the legacy hardware
modes that were
Off list. Don't want to spill gasoline on the fire.
Does your Signalink use a COM port at all?
My interface is homebrew, and uses one COM port to derive PTT from.
Packet is tolerant of losing part of the flag bits, maybe pactor too,
but AMTOR does not tolerate delays at all. It has been years
Signalink is not capable of high speed ARQ.
It uses vox, and doesn't have a real PTT with RTS.
Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, matt gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WONDERING IF ANYBODY IS USING A SIGNALINK SL+
FOR HIGH SPEED ARQ SOFTWARE IE RFSM2400 OR ALIKE ?
I'M
Skip
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:19 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: signalink sL+
Signalink is not capable of high speed ARQ.
It uses vox, and doesn't have a real PTT with RTS.
Bonnie
