Details are available on the Django project weblog:
https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2023/jan/02/bugfix-release/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 7:01 PM Tim Graham wrote:
> Incidentally, I don't think it's important for the ultimate decision here,
> but I looked at the below analysis of ticket #32189. Carlton's analysis on
> the ticket that request.POST is empty when using 'content-type':
> 'application/json'
I have implemented a first draft for this feature! Feedback and ideas are
greatly appreciated.
https://github.com/django/django/pull/16417
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34238
On Saturday, December 24, 2022 at 8:56:38 p.m. UTC-7 schinckel wrote:
> I believe there are a bunch of
Incidentally, I don't think it's important for the ultimate decision here,
but I looked at the below analysis of ticket #32189. Carlton's analysis on
the ticket that request.POST is empty when using 'content-type':
'application/json' remains true. The results of the tests provided in the
I guess it's nice to have a strict backport policy, partly to avoid hours
of discussion like this, which ultimately boils down to a
judgment/prediction about severity and whether or not the current backport
policy should be amended. If I encountered a similar issue, I would have
just worked
On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 12:54 PM Tim Graham wrote:
> Older Django releases are currently maintained with minimal support that
> allows existing projects to continue running securely. I don't think we
> should invest resources in promoting them as a place to use experimental
> features. A
Hi!
I think you've found the wrong mailing list for this post. This mailing
list is for discussing the development of Django itself, not for support
using Django. This means the discussions of bugs and features in Django
itself, rather than in your code using it. People on this list are unlikely
Hi i am using Apache with mod_wsgi.i want to serve 5000 users at a time.how
many processes and threads should I use in order to serve 5000 connections
concurrently...in wsgi daemon process ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers
Older Django releases are currently maintained with minimal support that
allows existing projects to continue running securely. I don't think we
should invest resources in promoting them as a place to use experimental
features. A benefit of running an old LTS release like 3.2 is that any
Mmmm I believe what you shared Shai is very sophisticated than what is
proposed.
The proposal is a shortcut function for with ability to have a custom
parent for more usability for an everyday use , like what's in the
documentation about managers.
My proposal is *not* a new way to write managers
On Sun, 1 Jan 2023 16:33:45 +0200
Ramez Ashraf wrote:
>
> Interested or do you think the function can be enhanced it to make
> more useable for your everyday other cases ?
>
This is half-baked, just a thought, but maybe you can take it some
place interesting:
Imagine a class that "collects"
Hi,
I think at this point it would help to move the discussion forward, if
we tried to step beyond the specific issue and phrase the revision in
the backporting policy. This will let us, I hope, have a more
principle-based discussion.
If I get it right -- please correct me, James -- it would be
Hello Adam
Happy new year!
Thank you for the feedback, really appreciate it.
I thought the same like you at first, a cool function in my project (which
is indeed the case)
One thing that gave me more incentive is the documentation code example.
IMO, i can see how shorter (and more readable) it
13 matches
Mail list logo
