Re: [dmarc-ietf] Don't trivialize psd=n

2024-03-12 Thread Neil Anuskiewicz
Is there any reason to lead with don’t worry about the tag but there is one critical use case. I think a more declarative statement in favor of the tag for those who will be stressed and skimming. Sure they might add a psd where it’s not needed but that’s better than not know the important

[dmarc-ietf] Don't trivialize psd=n

2024-03-10 Thread Douglas Foster
Both of these statements seem unnecessarily weak, bordering on apologetic. 5.3.General Record Format PSD ("n") ."... There is no need to put psd=n in a DMARC record, except in the very unusual case of a parent PSD publishing a DMARC record without the requisite psd=y tag." 11.8 Determination of