On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:55 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Thu 14/Mar/2024 15:47:14 +0100 Todd Herr wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:19 AM Alessandro Vesely
> wrote:
> >> On 12/03/2024 03:18, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
> >> > Please remove the pct tag from the spec.
> >>
> >> It has been
> On Mar 9, 2024, at 10:05 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as ADSP is historical, perhaps we can strike A5 entirely. If not, we should
> at least eliminate bullet 5:
>
> 5. ADSP has no support for a slow rollout, i.e., no way to configure
> a percentage of email on which
On 14/03/2024 19:06, Matt V wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:55 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Thu 14/Mar/2024 15:47:14 +0100 Todd Herr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:19 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 12/03/2024 03:18, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
Please remove the pct tag from the spec.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 10:55 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Thu 14/Mar/2024 15:47:14 +0100 Todd Herr wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:19 AM Alessandro Vesely
> wrote:
> >> On 12/03/2024 03:18, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
> >> > Please remove the pct tag from the spec.
> >>
> >> It has been
On Thu 14/Mar/2024 15:47:14 +0100 Todd Herr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:19 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 12/03/2024 03:18, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
> Please remove the pct tag from the spec.
It has been removed already, which is incompatible with current records.
I don't believe your
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 5:19 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On 12/03/2024 03:18, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
> > Please remove the pct tag from the spec.
>
> It has been removed already, which is incompatible with current records.
>
I don't believe your assertion of incompatibility to be true, Ale.
On 12/03/2024 03:18, Neil Anuskiewicz wrote:
Please remove the pct tag from the spec.
It has been removed already, which is incompatible with current records.
Best
Ale
--
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
Please remove the pct tag from the spec.
> On Mar 9, 2024, at 7:05 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as ADSP is historical, perhaps we can strike A5 entirely. If not, we should
> at least eliminate bullet 5:
>
> 5. ADSP has no support for a slow rollout, i.e., no way to configure
Tim Wicinski skrev den 2024-03-10 00:48:
I agree with Ale here - ADSP was moved to Historic in 2013. Appendix
A.5 should be dropped, and some text in the document should mention
ADSP is historic
bla bla, ADSP is historic as working in spamassassin, see no reason to
remove it, senders can
I agree with Ale here - ADSP was moved to Historic in 2013. Appendix A.5
should be dropped, and some text in the document should mention ADSP is
historic
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 10:05 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as ADSP is historical, perhaps we can strike A5 entirely. If not, we
>
Hi,
as ADSP is historical, perhaps we can strike A5 entirely. If not, we
should at least eliminate bullet 5:
5. ADSP has no support for a slow rollout, i.e., no way to configure
a percentage of email on which the Mail Receiver should apply the
policy. This is important for
11 matches
Mail list logo
