Re: [dmarc-discuss] General DMARC weakness - personal forwarding

(adding to the comments already posted...) On 5/21/2018 8:29 AM, Pete Holzmann via dmarc-discuss wrote: * From 'R's perspective, they simply want those emails to show up in their "other inbox" Most of the anti-spam technical work has focused on transport-related mechanisms, without much

Re: [dmarc-discuss] General DMARC weakness - personal forwarding

In article you write: >Until then, a simple forwarding —refraining to append any disclaimer or virus >scanning notice to the body of the message— would not break DKIM signatures and >hence leave DMARC authenticity intact. That is exactly the problem

Re: [dmarc-discuss] General DMARC weakness - personal forwarding

On Mon 21/May/2018 18:24:13 +0200 Ken O'Driscoll via dmarc-discuss wrote: > On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 09:29 -0600, Pete Holzmann via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> QUESTIONS: >> 1) Is anyone working to solve these issues? >> 2) Has there been consideration of a forwarding token that could validate >> all