Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC policy change for mail.ua / corp.mail.ru

Hey All, Forgive this naive question but what sort of preparations are people doing for this type of change? Thanks, Ben > On Mar 28, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Udeme Ukutt via dmarc-discuss > wrote: > > Thanks! > > Udeme > > On Monday, March 28, 2016, Vladimir Dubrovin

Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions

> On Feb 17, 2016, at 2:05 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss > wrote: > > Ben Greenfield wrote: > >> I believe the IP and hostname match exactly the ip address and hostname of >> the working DKIM, SPF. I was assuming that these were the emails that went >> to

Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions

I keep forgetting the most important clue to the whole thing. The domains that are failing the DKIM are google.com AOL Yahoo! Inc. Which is why I thought it must be list-serv traffic. Ben > On Feb 17, 2016, at 2:05 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss > wrote: >

Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions

> On Feb 16, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss > wrote: > > Franck Martin wrote: > >> Yes it is a "you have to be this tall to ride with us". For instance, many >> Wordpress sites are on URL blocking lists, because the managers >> cannot keep with

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Experience 16 days with DMARC

Labs Director > Mobile: +65 9670 0022 > 3 Phillip Street, #13-03 Royal Group Building, Singapore 048693 > > >www.trustsphere.com > > > > > ____ > From: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of Ben > Greenfield vi

[dmarc-discuss] Experience 16 days with DMARC

First off I think DMARC is great and I’m happy with and want to try to use the information to protect my domain name. I have been using dmarcian.com to analyze the reports and any terminology I use should be considered in the context of their tools. Their tools are all I know… so far. Since I

Re: [dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions

> On Feb 1, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Steven M Jones wrote: > >> Should one use one DKIM key for each domain or a single domain tie it to the >> ip addresses and the DNS text records sort out whether the domain is >> associated with the sending ip’s DKIM key. > > I may just not be

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Increase in Forwarders Since Implementation of DMARC Reject Policy

ee it at > https://github.com/linkedin/dmarc-msys/blob/master/dmarc.lua#L685 > <https://github.com/linkedin/dmarc-msys/blob/master/dmarc.lua#L685> > > So it will all depend on how the receiver handles the exceptions to the DMARC > policy. > > > On Mon, Feb 1

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Increase in Forwarders Since Implementation of DMARC Reject Policy

I finally got my google reports for the past 2 days and I was able to run them through dmarcian.com. I would say it takes about a week for a newly dmarc’ed domain to be pulled from the spambots to drop a domain. Since configuring dmarc started out with 4260 forwarders threat/unknown’s on 1/21

[dmarc-discuss] Google stopped sending out dmarc reports?

Hey All, I never a got a DMARC report from google yesterday which usually has the most traffic for my domain. I figured that it was no big deal ti happens. This morning I was loading DMARC in to my trial dmarcian.com account (thanks Tim) and poking around the interface to see what it does.

[dmarc-discuss] unknown forwarder a 100% DKIM survival

I just got my dmarc report from google today it has one email message recorded with a 100% DKIM survival. The domain is relexon.net which could be Facebook? Is Facebook forwarding my messages undisturbed to it’s users so this would be another example of dmarc working? Thanks, Ben

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Increase in Forwarders Since Implementation of DMARC Reject Policy

Hey All, I saw an uptick in Forwarders as soon as I started to use a setting other “p=none”. I wondered what caused this. Here is my wild theory about my situation and may apply to you and maybe wrong. My mail server I believe is configured to be susceptible to I think the term is backscatter

[dmarc-discuss] google dmarc report reject from my sources

Hey All, I’m looking at my latest google dmarc report and I see that 2 messages were from my domain and rejected, other were accepted. I looked through the logs and sure enough I see the 2 rejected messages in my log files. They were rejected because they weren’t authenticated. This looks

[dmarc-discuss] introduction to the list-virtual server & mailman questions

Hey All, My name is Ben Greenfield and I have been running a couple of smalltime mail servers (fewer then 200 messages a day) not accounting for an occasional blast from a 1,500 person listserv. All the machines our hosted onsite. I have been running SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for about a week and