Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Feb 9, 2017 01:36, "Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss" < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: On 02/08/2017 10:45 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss wrote (after Jim Popovitch wrote): They have an obligation, to everyone, to get it right, irregardless of >> sender preferences. >> > I have to say that

Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC management how to

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Sistemisti Posta via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Hello, > > how do you manage DMARC in multidomain environment? > > Renew the DKIM keys, deal with all DNS record... is not easy. You could always use CNAMEs back to a few rotated keys. -Jim P.

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Jim Popovitch wrote: > > >>> You should definitely disregard reports that aren't useful to you. >> >> I'd actually prefer to work with the sender in order to fully >> understand the differences

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Jim Popovitch wrote: > > >> The difficulty I have is exactly as you described. I received a >> DMARC report that says there is a DKIM failure, but what is not clear >> is whether or not the email

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 5:31 PM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > > > Am 01.02.2017 um 15:11 schrieb Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss: >> I'm running postfix and AFAIK it's only sending 7bit. >> >> postfix postscreen >>

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:50 AM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > > Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss: > >> I'd bet a few beers that the DKIM failures are due to those companies >> injecting inbound msg headers before processing DMARC ch

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Jim Popovitch wrote: > > >> I rolled out additional DMARC support for Mailman (outbound alignment) >> recently, and to be honest I'm not yet convinced that all receivers >> have a clue when

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Peter Gonzalez via dmarc-discuss wrote: > On 2017 Jan 31, 05:59, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Dave Warren wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, at 04:23, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> > >> >> But what can you do about it?

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Dave Warren via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, at 04:23, Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:13 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss >> <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Bear in mind that all reporting is at the good graces of receivers; the > options to fine-tune what is sent may, or may not, actually be implemented by > any given receiver. Great point. I do

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:50 PM, John Levine wrote: > In article > you > write: >>Hello, >> >>I'm trying to limit RUA/RUFs to legitimate emails that need eyeballs. >> >>To that end, I'm scratching my head as

Re: [dmarc-discuss] RUF reports

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Steven M Jones <s...@crash.com> wrote: > On 01/05/2017 17:32, Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> I've been trying, albeit slowly, to determine why I haven't seen any >> RUF reports since Sept 2016. >> >> Shouldn't this RUA re

[dmarc-discuss] RUF reports

Hello, I've been trying, albeit slowly, to determine why I haven't seen any RUF reports since Sept 2016. Shouldn't this RUA report also produce a corresponding RUF? http://domainmail.org/dmarc-reports/126.com%21inug.org%211483574400%211483660799.xml -Jim P.