Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

2017-01-31 Thread Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Jim Popovitch wrote: > > >> I rolled out additional DMARC support for Mailman (outbound alignment) >> recently, and to be honest I'm not yet convinced that all receivers >> have a clue when

Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendkim-atpszone reproducibility and examples

2017-01-31 Thread Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
I'd suggest that reliance upon ADSP is unwise as - having being reclassified as historic - it could stop working at any time without warning. A better option might be to sign your reports with the DKIM signature of the reporting domain (i.e. sign with example.eu instead of example.com in your

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

2017-01-31 Thread Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Peter Gonzalez via dmarc-discuss wrote: > On 2017 Jan 31, 05:59, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Dave Warren wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, at 04:23, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> > >> >> But what can you do about it?

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

2017-01-31 Thread Peter Gonzalez via dmarc-discuss
On 2017 Jan 31, 05:59, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Dave Warren wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, at 04:23, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > >> But what can you do about it? What is the "value" of having that > >> information, and what is the "cost" of capturing it? > > > > To

Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendkim-atpszone reproducibility and examples

2017-01-31 Thread Benny Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss skrev den 2017-01-30 22:30: Am 30.01.2017 um 21:40 schrieb SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss: I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records don't waste your time with ADSP, forget it. it's deprecated and in fact dead and spamassaasin does not care of

Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendkim-atpszone reproducibility and examples

2017-01-31 Thread Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss
SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss wrote: > I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records as well to send > dmarc reports and i had a fun time trying to reproduce the output for i do > not know how long the url i mention will last. > Is nearly the same but I am confused - is the web

Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet?

2017-01-31 Thread Payne, John via dmarc-discuss
On Jan 19, 2017, at 12:26 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss > wrote: Brandon Long wrote: > If you go to p=quarantine and pct=0, Google Groups will still do the > rewriting, but no one > should enforce the quarantine. I know this is

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

2017-01-31 Thread Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Dave Warren via dmarc-discuss wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, at 04:23, Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:13 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss >> wrote: >> > I concur with Roland.

Re: [dmarc-discuss] opendkim-atpszone reproducibility and examples

2017-01-31 Thread SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss
I would rather not rebuild our mail server(s) and the bits hanging off it just to keep opendmarc-report functionality since they do everything else ok. Thanks. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:30 PM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > > > Am 30.01.2017 um 21:40 schrieb