On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
wrote:
> Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
>
>> I rolled out additional DMARC support for Mailman (outbound alignment)
>> recently, and to be honest I'm not yet convinced that all receivers
>> have a clue when
I'd suggest that reliance upon ADSP is unwise as - having being reclassified as
historic - it could stop working at any time without warning. A better option
might be to sign your reports with the DKIM signature of the reporting domain
(i.e. sign with example.eu instead of example.com in your
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Peter Gonzalez via dmarc-discuss
wrote:
> On 2017 Jan 31, 05:59, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, at 04:23, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> >
>> >> But what can you do about it?
On 2017 Jan 31, 05:59, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, at 04:23, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> >
> >> But what can you do about it? What is the "value" of having that
> >> information, and what is the "cost" of capturing it?
> >
> > To
A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss skrev den 2017-01-30 22:30:
Am 30.01.2017 um 21:40 schrieb SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss:
I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records
don't waste your time with ADSP, forget it.
it's deprecated and in fact dead
and spamassaasin does not care of
SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records as well to send
> dmarc reports and i had a fun time trying to reproduce the output for i do
> not know how long the url i mention will last.
> Is nearly the same but I am confused - is the web
On Jan 19, 2017, at 12:26 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
> wrote:
Brandon Long wrote:
> If you go to p=quarantine and pct=0, Google Groups will still do the
> rewriting, but no one
> should enforce the quarantine. I know this is
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Dave Warren via dmarc-discuss
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017, at 04:23, Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:13 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss
>> wrote:
>> > I concur with Roland.
I would rather not rebuild our mail server(s) and the bits hanging off it
just to keep opendmarc-report functionality since they do everything else
ok.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:30 PM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>
>
> Am 30.01.2017 um 21:40 schrieb