Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts

My 2 cents, if we are validating an email then the services MUST cover email, either by including '*' or 'email'. Regardless of what attachments that email contains. RFC8460 appears to conflict with 6376 in this regard, and with that in mind 8460 should be updated to suggest s=email:tlsrpt or

Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC vs DKIM keys with s=mtasts

On Thu, 9 Apr 2020, at 5:33 AM, John Levine wrote: > > I'm inclined to submit an erratum and say the s=tlsrpt signature language > was a mistake. > I would have no objection to that. -- Marc Bradshaw marcbradshaw.net | @marcbradshaw