DMARC setting change

We've changed the list dmarc mitigation to happen unconditionally now. This will likely have an impact on people's mails, so this is a headsup for everyone so they know. Please let me know if this causes too much bother, but keep in mind that right now lot of emails are being bounced and

Re: 2.4 ballpark release date?

> On 03/04/2024 21:09 EEST Shawn Heisey via dovecot wrote: > > > On 4/30/23 22:53, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > > 2.4 is planned for sometime after summer this year. > > Aki > > Considering that it's now almost a year later, this seems to have slipped. > > Thanks, > Shawn Hi! We are

storage format migration for folders

> > > > > > > > > breaking the mail index > > > > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox > > > renaming > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate > indices)? > > > > > > > > > > Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only

Re: storage format migration for folders

> On 05/04/2024 13:26 EEST Marc wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > breaking the mail index > > > > > > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox > > > > renaming > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate > > indices)? > > > > > > > >

RE: Users with enough rope to hang themselves

> > > breaking the mail index > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox > renaming > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate indices)? > > > > Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only mailbox GUID on > disk, and the folder name

Re: [EXT] RE: Users with enough rope to hang themselves

> On 05/04/2024 12:36 EEST Marc wrote: > > > > > > breaking the mail index > > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox > > renaming > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate indices)? > > > > > > > Dovecot is, if you use

RE: storage format migration for folders

  On 05/04/2024 17:49 EEST Marc via dovecot wrote:     doveadm sync -u testacc 'mdbox:/home/testing/testacc/mdbox:INDEX=/home/testing/ testacc/index:CONT ROL=/home/testing/testacc/mail/control:LAYOUT=index' >

RE: storage format migration for folders

> On 05/04/2024 15:53 EEST Marc via dovecot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > breaking the mail index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize > > mailbox > > > > > > renaming > > > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or

RE: storage format migration for folders

> > > > doveadm sync -u testacc > 'mdbox:/home/testing/testacc/mdbox:INDEX=/home/testing/testacc/index:CONT > ROL=/home/testing/testacc/mail/control:LAYOUT=index' > > > > Which gives me the expectec result. But I have also an archive > namespace and an alt namespace that is going to be quite a lot

RE: storage format migration for folders

> > > > > > > > > > > breaking the mail index > > > > > > > > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize > mailbox > > > > > renaming > > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate > > > indices)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dovecot is, if you

Re: DMARC setting change

We've changed the list dmarc mitigation to happen unconditionally now. What does "mitigation to happen unconditionally" mean? What was changed? Are you talking about changing the policy action? ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To

Re: DMARC setting change

> "dovecot---" == dovecot--- via dovecot writes: >> We've changed the list dmarc mitigation to happen unconditionally >> now. dovecot---> What does "mitigation to happen unconditionally" mean? dovecot---> What was changed? Are you talking about changing the dovecot---> policy action?