Hello David,
- Nachricht von David Pottage via dovecot -
Datum: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:58:14 +
Von: David Pottage via dovecot
Antwort an: David Pottage
Betreff: Re: Virus scan + removal on a mdbox mail storage
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
[...]
NO! My mail
On 2019-02-21 22:18, Sami Ketola via dovecot wrote:
On 21 Feb 2019, at 12.23, Hajo Locke via dovecot
wrote:
I think mbox+procmail is a classic setup and wide used and good
solution for many usecases. Same setup we use many years.
We run ~2 mio mailboxes. our automated systems depends on this
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, SH Development wrote:
To: Joan Moreau via dovecot
Jean did take over the list for a while when developing his FTS backend,
so you can be forgiven that he actually runs this list.
2. It was also suggested to rsync the directory, but the question was
brought up, and not
I am trying to use the checkpassword authentication
(https://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/CheckPassword)
I do have a working checkpassword program. The protocol expects to received on
fd 3 the
following:
usernamepasswordoptionalstuff
I find that this works properly and the program can
On 2019-02-20 19:02, Christoph Haas via dovecot wrote:
On 2019-02-20 01:46, Christoph Haas via dovecot wrote:
I need advice on how virus scan and removal can be done on a _mdbox_
mail storage?
On a maildir storage the virus scanner (e.g. clamav etc.) can detect
and remove a email that is
For replicated servers I'm stuck with 2.2.33.2 because of pop3/dsync problems,
but on single servers I have no index problems after upgrading to
dovecot-2.2.35-1.el7.centos.0.x86_64
or dovecot-2.2.36-3.el7.x86_64.
All servers run CentOS 7 (RHEL 7) but use lmtp delivery with mdbox and sieve.
El 21/02/2019 a las 10:51, Aki Tuomi via dovecot escribió:
On 21.2.2019 10.53, Hajo Locke via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
Am 20.02.2019 um 10:39 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
On 18 February 2019 09:28 Hajo Locke via dovecot
wrote:
Hello,
it seems we need a dovecot developers opinion. May
Hello,
Am 21.02.2019 um 12:18 schrieb Sami Ketola via dovecot:
On 21 Feb 2019, at 12.23, Hajo Locke via dovecot wrote:
I think mbox+procmail is a classic setup and wide used and good solution for
many usecases. Same setup we use many years.
We run ~2 mio mailboxes. our automated systems
On 21.2.2019 13.47, Lionel Elie Mamane via dovecot wrote:
> I noticed a mail stuck in my mail queue. dovecot-lda was returning
> error 64 Invalid parameter given. (EX_USAGE).
>
> Weird, weird, weird. After some sleuthing, I found the sender address
> was firstl...@domain.tld, with a UTF8-encoded
I noticed a mail stuck in my mail queue. dovecot-lda was returning
error 64 Invalid parameter given. (EX_USAGE).
Weird, weird, weird. After some sleuthing, I found the sender address
was firstl...@domain.tld, with a UTF8-encoded Unicode U+FEFF ZERO
WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE character (AKA byte order
> On 21 Feb 2019, at 12.23, Hajo Locke via dovecot wrote:
> I think mbox+procmail is a classic setup and wide used and good solution for
> many usecases. Same setup we use many years.
> We run ~2 mio mailboxes. our automated systems depends on this setup.
> creating mailboxes, managing
Hello,
Am 21.02.2019 um 10:51 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
On 21.2.2019 10.53, Hajo Locke via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
Am 20.02.2019 um 10:39 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
On 18 February 2019 09:28 Hajo Locke via dovecot
wrote:
Hello,
it seems we need a dovecot developers opinion.
On 21.2.2019 10.53, Hajo Locke via dovecot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 20.02.2019 um 10:39 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
>>> On 18 February 2019 09:28 Hajo Locke via dovecot
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> it seems we need a dovecot developers opinion. May be we hit a
>>> bug or cant help
Hello,
Am 20.02.2019 um 10:39 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
On 18 February 2019 09:28 Hajo Locke via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
it seems we need a dovecot developers opinion. May be we hit a bug or cant help ourselves.
Thanks for your answer.
Core dump with backtrace would help, if
14 matches
Mail list logo
