Ah, well, I suggest you write your own patch and implement it then, since you
have no interest in any explanations at all having already made up your mind.
You din't come here for help or information, you came to argue.
right. that's it.
On 09 Apr 2021, at 13:06, PGNet Dev wrote:
>> then the software is entirely correct in deciding to use any of those
>> addresses in whatever order it wants.
>
> Complete and utter malarkey.
Ah, well, I suggest you write your own patch and implement it then, since you
have no interest in any
then the software is entirely correct in deciding to use any of those addresses in whatever order it wants.
Complete and utter malarkey.
But believe what you like.
Might wanna READ the code before going on about the "additional burden"
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 01:15:27PM -0400, PGNet Dev wrote:
There's no sound reason -- technical or otherwise -- of not providing perfectly
legitimate infrastructure-config choices to the admin, and an option to
override default behaviors.
Especially when the override is of defaults that are
On 4/9/21 12:55 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 09 Apr 2021, at 08:29, PGNet Dev wrote:
And it's a bad assumption that since the host is dual-stack that all services
on it will be.
If a hostname resolves to both an A and record, it should provides
services on both.
Says who/what?
There is
On 09 Apr 2021, at 08:29, PGNet Dev wrote:
>
>>> And it's a bad assumption that since the host is dual-stack that all
>>> services on it will be.
>> If a hostname resolves to both an A and record, it should provides
>> services on both.
>
> Says who/what?
>
> There is no
On 09 Apr 2021, at 07:57, Arjen de Korte wrote:
> Citeren PGNet Dev :
>> And it's a bad assumption that since the host is dual-stack that all
>> services on it will be.
> I fail to see why. If a hostname resolves to both an A and record, it
> should provides services on both.
Yes, that
And it's a bad assumption that since the host is dual-stack that all services
on it will be.
If a hostname resolves to both an A and record, it should provides
services on both.
Says who/what?
There is no should/must/shall in any internet standard that
suggest/implies/requires that.
On Friday, April 9, 2021 5:19:20 AM AKDT PGNet Dev wrote:
> And it's a bad assumption that since the host is dual-stack that all
> services on it will be.
That's right. Email stuff that's supposed to work has to be crippled and
disabled somehow so that it does not actually work as it is supposed
Citeren PGNet Dev :
On 4/9/21 8:08 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 08 Apr 2021, at 06:08, PGNet Dev wrote:
whereas other services listen at both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, with
IPv6 preferred over IPv4, postfix listens ONLY on IPv4,
Do you mean that YOUR postfix only listens to ipv4?
Yep.
If so,
On 4/9/21 8:08 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 08 Apr 2021, at 06:08, PGNet Dev wrote:
whereas other services listen at both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, with IPv6
preferred over IPv4, postfix listens ONLY on IPv4,
Do you mean that YOUR postfix only listens to ipv4?
Yep.
If so, wouldn't the solution be
On 08 Apr 2021, at 06:08, PGNet Dev wrote:
> whereas other services listen at both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, with IPv6
> preferred over IPv4, postfix listens ONLY on IPv4,
Do you mean that YOUR postfix only listens to ipv4? If so, wouldn't the
solution be to setup postfix to listen to ipv6?
On 4/8/21 7:56 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
One has to ask why it has record in DNS if you don't intend to use it?
Because that's my infrastructure.
As already stated in the OP:
whereas other services listen at both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, with IPv6
preferred over IPv4,
One has to ask why it has record in DNS if you don't intend to use it?
Aki
> On 08/04/2021 14:45 PGNet Dev wrote:
>
>
> How do you turn OFF, or reduce priority of, IPv6 connect attempts by
> submission relay?
>
> On 4/3/21 8:03 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> > my server is a linux,
How do you turn OFF, or reduce priority of, IPv6 connect attempts by submission
relay?
On 4/3/21 8:03 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
my server is a linux, dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 host
it runs multiple services, including, but not limited to, postfix & dovecot
the hostname is
internal.mx.example.com
my server is a linux, dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 host
it runs multiple services, including, but not limited to, postfix & dovecot
the hostname is
internal.mx.example.com
its DNS config,
host internal.mx.example.com
internal.mx.example.com has address 10.1.1.15
16 matches
Mail list logo
